Gadiraju Pavan Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Occ. Business, Respondents No.7 to 9 are resident of H.No.25-33, Ashok Road, ft/ancherial, Dist. Mancherial. Respondents No.7 to 9 are brought on record- as LRs of the deceased Resiondent No.6 as per Court ordei dated 28-11.2023 in l.A. No. 312022. '10.Adluri Srinivas Raju, S/o Late Narasimha Raju, Aged- gbo-uJ 50 Yrs, Occ. Engineer, R/o H. Nb. 25-113, Ashok Road, Mancherial, Dist. Mancherial. '1 l.Adluri Ravinder Raju, S/o Late Narasimha Raju, Aged-.abo-u]' 49 Yrs, Occ' Business, R/o H. N<i. 25'113, Ashok Road, Mancherial, Dist. Mancherial. 12.Adluri Janakirama Raju, S/o Late Narasimha Raju, Aged about.40 Yrs, Occ. Advocate, Rl/o H. No. 25-113, Ashok Road, ManCherial, Dist. Mancherial. 2 J 4 5 7 1 3. Venkata Ramani, W/o Tumuki Srinivas Raju, Aged z bout_ 45 yrs, Occ. -- Household, Ri/o H. No. 25-113, Ashok Road, Manchirial )ist. Mancheiial.- 14.Jhansi Rani, W/o Kanchanapelli poomachander Raju, , r(led about. 42 yrs, Ois]l 9cc. Household, Rl/o H.No. 25-113, Ashok n6i t 'VancfrJriaf Mancherial. Respondent No.'l 0 to 1 4 are brought on record as I .l l:; of the deceased Respondent No.5 as per Court Order-dated 28.11.2023 . tA No. 1l2),a.---- - , ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f the constitution of lndi r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the l- i,;h Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, prefe r rbly in the nature of a writ of certiorari calling for the proceedings in .No.7sl2021 GlBsB3l2o15 dated 01-02-2021 from the file of the Respondent No-2 and upon p(,r .rsal of the same be pleased to quash the ,said proceedings and consequentialy l .w the appeal fired by the Petitioner filed before the Respondent No.3 challengir rr ths e1js15 p2ss.6 by the Respondent No.4 passed in proc.No.RoFi/Naspur/65r':r013 dated 20-02- 2013 issuing RoR proceedings in favour of the Responck rr t No.5 and 6 with respect to the land to an extent of Acers 1 .27 Guntas in Sur u : y No.4g of Naspur Village and Mandal, Mancherial district in the interest of justic > lA NO: 'l OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the cir,:r rnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court r ay be pleased to suspend the effect and operation of RoR proceedings issue,l by the Respondent No.4 issued in Proc. No. RoRl/Naspur/654/20'r 3 dated 2o-ol-:'t.3 in favour of the Respondent No.5 and 6 with respect to the land to an extent , i\cers .1 .27 Guntas in Survey No.4B of Naspur Village and Mandat, Manche.i r district, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section '1 s1 cpc praying that in the cin r nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court nay be preased to expedite the date of hearing of the above referred w p No. r', e,6 r 2021 by fixing the date for hearing and pending disposal of this Writ petition. lA NO: 4 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondenls to scrupulously follow the orders passed by This Honourable Court in the present Writ Petition dated 08/03/2021 and maintain status quo over the subject land and take steps to remove the illegal structures raised after the said status quo orders were passed by this Honourable Court. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file additional material papers in W.P. No.5266 of 2021 . lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the proceedings in ST.No.7512021 and 5T/336/2021 dated

29.06.2021 on the file of the Respondent No 2 and upon perusal of the same be pleased to quash the said proceedings and consequentially allow the appeal bearing No.G/8583/2015, filed by the Petitioner before the Respondent No 3 challenging the ROR proceedings issued by the Respondent No.4 through Proceedings No RORI/Naspurl654l2013 dated 20.07.2013 ih favour of the Respondent No 5 and 6 with respect to the land to an extent of Acers 1 .27 Guntas in Survey No 48 of Naspur Village and Mandal Mancherial District in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: Adluri Narsimharaju S/o. Ramaraju, aged about: 75 R/o.H.No.25-33, Ashok Road, Mancherial, Dist: Mancherial. Yrs., Occ: Business, ...PET]TIONER AND ' ;3i,?li5,,:iJ:i1r,T3"5:r#:i",i?i jJrits pri ncipa s; ecreta ry Reven ue "likf{'"i?iifl";fl ff fi ,:f, :?:,1*t,*1;ffi {r*B#,.l.3x;",*1 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial Revenue Div s :n, Mancherial. 4. The Tahsildar, Naspur Mandal, Mancherial District_ u 3,io,f{,1 :i.!l? #l Ei; .JB B"'; };'fi1?t?,Ti,-#ffi o i u . r s, o cc : B u s i n e s s, .RESPONDENTS s tances stated in 1, be pleased to ' and to dismiss Petition under Secti the arridavit rir"o in,,ppo',| ::[tHi:"L]i ;,::il.:I vacate the interim order dated 08.03.20 21 in Wp *o. arUU o, ,,,, the Writ petition. SRI D. V. SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SRI H. RAKESH KUMI , - Acp FoR REVENITT r Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. MANGULAL The Court made the following: ORDER "-_- THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION N0.5266 0F 2021 ORDER: When the matter is takcn up for considcration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration as the grievance of the petitioner has already been addressed by the official respondents and seeks to dismiss the Writ petition as withdrawn.

2. : Sri H. Rake sh l(umar, learned Assistar-rt Government Pleader repre senting lClrne d Govern ment pleader for Revenue takes no objection.

3. Recording the submission of the learncd counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shal1 stand dismisse<I. To //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANTfEGISTRAR sEcffioFFrcER /

1. One CC to SRI D. V. SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate IOPUCI 2. fwo CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to SRI R. MANGULAL, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies ; ! ! MP o HIGH COURT DAI I :D:2610912025 t t,t ou- 2.1 fS)filtn t r, fC,\ ORDER WP.N( ,5266 of 2021 DISMISSING THE \TI?IT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WII'{OUT COSTS