The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
3. Smt. G.Vasantha,, Wo K.Suresh Kumar, aged about 53 years, presently residing at Kingdom of Beharin. .....PETITIONERS AND 1 2 .| State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad. The Protection Officer, O/o Proiect Director, District Women and Child Development Department, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad. Smt. Lakshmi Rao, W/o H.N.S.Rao, Rl/o Flat No.101 ' Excel Ashwini Apartmenls, Plot No.48, Journalists Colony, Road No.70' Jubilee Hills, Hvderabad. Office at Plot No.6-2-477, Secretariat Hills, Neknampur' Rijendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONOENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be circumstances sta pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of prohibiting the Court of the XXlll Metropolitan Magistrate, writ of prohibition, ranagar, Ranga Reddy District from proceeding with in Upparpalli, Rajen 6, declaring it as abuse of process of law. D.V.C.No. 27 of 20 l.A.NO: 1 oF 2017(VWMP. NO: 767 0F 20171 Between: Smt. Lakshmi Rao, W/o H.N.S Rao, R/o Flat No.101 , Excel Ashwinr Apartments, Plot ir^ i[.r",,.natists Colonv. Road No.70, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, Office at Plot ii ai q77 . Secretariat Hills, Neknampur, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District' .....PETlTlONER/RESPONDENT No.3 AND
1. State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad.
2. The Protection Officer, O/o Project Director, District Women and Child Development Department, Ranga Reddy District al Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
3. Smt. G.Uma Devi, W/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 75 years, R/o 120, 4. G.Ashwarth, S/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 47 years, Fyo '120, Prashasan Nagar, Road No.72, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. Prashasan Nagar, Road No.72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad
5. Smt. G.Vasantha,, W/o K.Suresh Kumar, aged about 53 years, presently residing at Kingdom of Beharin. .....RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS Petition Under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Coult may be pleased to vacate the order dt. 06.02.2017 passed in WPMP.No. 47Ol of 2017 in WP'No 3942 of 2017 in the interest of justice. t.A.NO:4 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 4707 O F 20171 Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay alt further proceedings in D.v c.No.27 of 2016 on the file of the court of the XXll lVletropolitan Magistrate, Upparpalli, Hyderabad, including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of the writ petilion. l.A.NO :1 oF 2018 --1.-srt. Between G.Uma Devi, w/o Late Gurunatha Rao, aged about 75 years, R/o 120, Prashasan Nagar, Road No 72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad l
2. G.Ashwarth, Slo t_aie Gurunatha Rao, aged about 47 years, Fl/o 120, - 3. b;i c.Vr."nlr,r,, W/o K.Suresh Kumar, aged about 53 years' presently .....PETITIONERS Prutnu"un Nagar, Road No 72, Jubilee Hills' Hyderabad' residing at Kingdom of Beharin AND'"'i. Strt" of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary' Home Department' Secretariat Buildings, at Hyderabad' z. ine protection Officer' O/o Project Director' District Women and Child -' Development Department, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad' S. S.t. t-ixtn*i Rao, W/o H.N S Rao, FJo Flat No 101 ' Excel Ashwini -' nfr.t."nt., Plot No.48, Journalists Colony' Road No'70' Jubilee Hills' HiJeranaa, Office at Plot No 6-2-477, Secretariat Hills' Neknampur' Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District .....RESPONDENTS PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin tre anioavtt filed in support of the petition, the High Court may b^e^ pleased to tn" i."rim orders passed in W P No' 3942 of 2017 on 06 O2'2O17 ' "r.rj" Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V'SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent No'1 : SRI D'PRADEEP' AGP FOR HOME Gounsel for the Respondent No'2 : GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No'3 : SRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL The Court made the following ORDER , I I ? I t i , t T ! I I II{ TI"{E HIGH COURT FOR TFiE STATE OF TET.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD TTIE HONOIJRABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.3942 OF 2017 DATE:02.12.2025 Bet,.l,eor:: Sr n I',,rr,a De"i 8 C'thers AND ftre- Stat: ,)f Telangana & Others oflilliR . . . Petitioner . .. Respcnderrts Thrs \(irit Petrt on is filed seeking to prchibit the Ccir;-i or the X)(iil irr'it:tropolitan liagistrate, tJpparpalli. Rajeridranaoi:r. Rai'rg:r Rr:oiiy District frorri proceeding with in D.V.C.No. 27 c>f 2A16, dcc:r;iril :i as abuse cf prccess of latv ,l 3 I'i. l€ :rnp?ais 'rr the pelitioners Hea.d I\,4r D P-adeep, learneci Assrstant Goverrrrnent Piearier' fr:l l I ii: ne 4 ahe learneci Assistant Government Pleader for Horne subnrits tii.i't as the petitione i's irave not been prosecuting the,Tatter and J To
3. 4. 5. SA TJ Bt1 2 have renraineC unrepresented despite repeated listings, th'-rs the relief sought in the writ petition apparently, become infructuo,;s
5. The record discloses that when the inatter was listed on
04.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petirioners, whereupon the case was directed to be posted on 18. -t 1.2025. Cn
18.i1.2025, again, as there v,/a s no representation for the petitioners, the matier v;as directed io be listeo today under- tlte caption "for disnrissal." Even today, there is nc appearattce or repre':entation on benalf of the petitioners
6. ln these circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the cause in the writ petition has beconre infruchLous and that the petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prose ci.rtion 7 . Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution There shail be no ordei as to costs iVliscellaneous petitions, penciing if any, snall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/. K. BHAVANI SWAMY AS ISTANT REGIST SECTION OFFICER
1. Two CC's to GP FOR WOMEN Hig h Court for the State of Tela 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, H AN CHILD WELFARE, na. IOUTI Court for the of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI V.S URYA KIRAN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] One CC tO SRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL Two CD Copies , Advocale [OPUCI eertGs-iEE;,,, 2 1i u nR 2ll28 i\ .-) I * ) HIGH COURT DATED:0211212025 /. ---..) .) ORDER WP.No.3942 ot 2017 :g * DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON _ PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. 0 r-L \ ,b 1l . IA