✦ High Court of India · 14 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
14 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,196 words

to the Respondents and upon due enquiry punish them for willful disobedience of the lnterim Orders of the High Court made in W.P.tt/. P. No . 45912 of 2O15 in \NP 35727 of 2015 dated 03.1 '1.20'15. Between: Mohammed Hamid Rasheed Khan, s/o late l\4ohd. Abdul Rasheed Khan aged 66 years, occ business rlo no. 1O-4-61911 , RK Chambers Humayunnagar main road Hyderabad 500028 AND ...PETrTrON ER/(PETtTtONER) Secretariat. Hvderabad

1. Mr BR lVleena, Principal Secretary - Revenue The State of Telangana 2 Vt tt4C Gopal'Principal Se_cretary - The State of Telangana lrrlunicipal Administration and Urban Development Department Sdcre:ariat, Hyderabad - 3. lVr B Janardhan Reddy,. Commisdioner The Greater HyaeraUaa UtiniLifi-ai . 9,orpt, Sixt.h floor,,lVl un icip_al office complex Tank-bunij road, Hyderabid 4 Y, P Chand.r,:iah, Special Deputy Colleitor Land Acquisition Hyderabad lVlunicipal corpordtioh sixth floor, Ir/unicijal office complex Tank- bund road Hvderabad 'Griratei .....NTEMN.RS(RES'.NDENTS) C.C.No. 2263 OF 2015 contempt case U/s 10 and 12 of contempt of courts Act to issue summons to the Respondents herein and upon due enquiry punish them for willful disobedience of the lnterim orders of the High court made in w.p.lVl.p No.4s926 of 2015 in WP 35735 of 2015 dated 03.1 1 .20'15. Between '1 . Mir Fahad Ali. s/o late Farkunda Ari aged 4g years, occ business rro no. 1o-4- 6/9 and 10-4-6110 RK Chambers, Humayirnnagar main road Hyderabad 500028 2 Mir chirag Ali, s/o late Farkunda AIi aged 47 years, occ business rlo no. 1o-4- 6/9 and 10-4-6110 RK Chambers, Humayunnagar main road Hyderabad 500028 3. Mir Firasath Ali, S/o late Farkunda Ari aged 46 years, occ business r/o no. 10- 4-619 and 10-4-6110 RK Chambers, Humayunnagar main road HyAeranaA 500028 4 Niga,r Ayesha d/o late Farkunda Ari aged 45 years, occ househord r/o no. 10- main road UyOeiiOaA 4-619 and 10-4-611O RK Chambers, 500028 -Humayunnagar AND ...pETtTtoNERS(pETtTIONERS) Secretariat, Hyderabad 1 Yl Bl IVeena Prrncipal Secretary - Revenue The State of 1-elangana Z ft1 ttl C Gopal, Principal Se_cretary - The State of Telangana trrlunicipal 3. tVir B Janardhan Reddy, commisiioner Thei Greater Hvderabad t\,4rinicioar . 9.or!n , Sixth floor, Municipal office complex Tank_bunb roacl. Hyderabid - - 4 Y, P Chandrarah Special Deputy Colleitor Land Acquisition Cr6aiei Admrnrstration and Urban Development Department sdcretariat, Hyderabad Hyderabad .Mrnicipal corporatioh sixth floor, It/unicifial office complex Tank- bund road, Hyderabad ...CONTEMNORS(RESPONDENTS) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2264 0F 2015 contempt case U/s 10 and 12 of contempt of cou(s Act to issue summons to the Respondents and upon due enquiry punish them for willful disobedience of the lnterim Orders of the High Court made in W.P.M.P.No.45927 oI 2015 in WP 35740 oI 2015 dated 03.1 1 .201 5. Between: '1. Khaleeq lmran, s/o lqte lMohd. Habeebur Rahman aged 45 years, occ business r/o no. 10-4-QE/2, second floor RK Chambers, Humayunnagar main road Hyderabad 500028 2. fahniy.ath Ara, w/o late [r/ohd. Habeebur Rahman aged 75 years, occ household rlo no. 10-4-61811, first floor RK Chambers, Humayunnagar main road Hyderabad 500028 .,.PETtTtONER(PETtTtONERS) AND Secretariat, Hyderabad

1. tVr BR lVleena, Principal Secretary - Revenue The State of Telangana 2. It/r IMG Gopal, Principal Secretary - The State of Telangana ll/unicipal 3. tt4r B Janardhan Reddy, Commissioner The Greater Hyderabad N/unicipal Corpn., Sixth floor, Ir/lunicipal office complex Tank-bonil road, Hyderabad 4 Mr P Chandraiah, Special Deputy Collector Land Acquisition Greater Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Hyderabad Hyderabad [t/unicipal Corporation Sixth floor, It4unicipal office complex Tank- bund road' Hvderabad .....NTEMN.RS(RES'.NDENTS) Counsel for the Petitioner in all CCs : SRl. ARAVIND REP.SR| VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent No.2.in all CCs : GP FOR MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&4 in all CCs : AGP FOR LAND THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER : ACQUISATION I i 'i t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREEN IVAS RAO CONTEMPI CASE Nos. 2236.2262. 2263 &,2264 0F 2015 COMMON ORDER: Mr. Aravind, learned counsel representing Mr. Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners in all these contempt CASES. These contempt cases have been filed to punish the respondents - contemnors for non-implementation of the common order dated 03. 1 I .20 15 passed by this Court in WPMP.No.46007 of 2015 in W.p.No.3579B of 2OtS, WPMP.No.4S9 12 of 2015 in W.p.No.3S727 of 2015, WPMP.No.45926 of 2O15 in W.P.No.3573T of 2OtS and WPMP-No.45927 of 2015 in W.p.No.3ST4O of 2OtS by invoking the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 197 1 . Leamed Assistant Government pleader for Land Acquisition submits that the Specia,l Deputy Collector (L.A.) filed counter affrdavit, wherein it is stated that the respondents have not only demolished the structures of the \ I , I , I I i I I To, 1 2 3 I 2 petitioners but also other buildings which are getting aIfected in the road widening in the same stretch. Petitioners have not Iiled any reply denying the above said averment. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered view that no further adjudication is required in these contempt CASCS. Accordingly, the contempt cases are closed. However, the petitioners are granted liberty to avail the remedies available to them under law, if any cause exists Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed. No order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER One CC to Sri Vivek Jain Advocate (OPUC) Two CCs to G.P. for Land Acquisation, H igh Court at Hyderabad[OUT] Two CCs to G P foi ft/unicipal Administration, High Court for the State of Ielangana at Hyderabad[OUT]. Two CD Copies r the State of T elangana ,

4. . +,/*y HIGH COURT DATED:1410212025 1HE ls TA o k J U 2z mnv 2025 s o P,1 1 t.^1\> eO Ijt {' COMMON ORDER CC.No.2236,2262,2263 AND 2264 OF 2015 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASES. WITHOUT COSTS. @ s) 2-{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments