Mrs. Ghousia Begum v. The State of A.P
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI. JUSTICE : GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5337 OF 2007 Between:
#1. Mrs. Ghousia Begum, W/o Late Khaleel-ur-Rahman,
#2. Mr. Mohd. Anees-ur-Rahman, S/o Late Khaleel-ur-Rahman,
#3. Mrs. Shabinaz Fathima, D/o Late Khaleel-ur-Rahman. Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4 AND
#1. The State of A.P. rep. by its by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. 2Mrs. Afsha Jabeen, D/o Syed Fasiuddin. Respondents/Petitioner Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the Memorandum of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in M.C.No.14/05 in respect of the petitioner No.1 (R2) Petitioner No.2 (R3) and the petitioner No.3 (R4) on the file of XIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. FOR THE PETITIONERS : SRI SYED LATEEF (NOT PRESENT) FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.1 : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.2 : SRI S. SHARAT KUMAR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: SD/- T. LAKSHMI HEMALATHA // TRUE COPY // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
#1. The XXII Metropolitan (Mahila) Court Magistrate at Hyderabad.
#2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P. Hyderabad(OUT)
#3. One CC to Sri Syed Lateef, Advocate. (OPUC)
#4. Two CD copies. HIGH COURT TGKJ DATED 28-04-2009 ORDER CRL.P.NO.5337 OF 07 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR DEFAULT
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 28 Apr 2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.