High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for 1 Domestic connectioh, total Domestic contract Load of 45000 watts, vide Reg.No. LT{r/256330025 to the Ff- petitioner Part of Plot No.49, in Survey Nos.11119, 11120 and 11121 , admeasuring 200 sq. yards, (Out of total admeasuring 1000 sq. yards), situated at Khanamet (V),. Serilingampally (l\4), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S , bounded by North Part of Plot lJo.49 South Plot No.50 East Part of PIot No.49 West 33 Ft. Wide Road., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequent y direct the respondents to recelve application and to release the individual service connection without being influerrced by the instructions of the 8th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be plerased to direct the Respondents 2 1o 7 to process the application of the Petitioner kr provide for 1 Domestic Connection. total Domestic Contract Load of 45000 Watts. vide Reg.No. LT1V256330025 to the petitioner Part of Plot No.49, in Survey Nos;.'1 1/'19, 11l20 and 11121, admeasuring 200 sq. yards, (Out of total admeasuring 1C00 sq. yards), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (lt/), Under GH It4C, llanga Reddy District, T.S. bounderd by North Part of Plot No.49; South Plot No.50; East Part of ,r- '.,, Plot No.49 West 33' Ft. Wide Road. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 7: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIAPAL CORPORATION The Court made the following: ORDER

4.i f' HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA PET N of2 2 ORDER Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, tearned Assistant Government Pleader for Energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri. N. Sreedhar Reddy, tearned Standing Counsel for TGSpDCL appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, {. learned Standang Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondent No.g. 2 he Detition er aDDroac ed the Cou rt seekino raver as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 7 in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide for 1 Domestic Connection, total Domestic Contract Load of 45000 Watts, vide Reg. No.1TM256330025 to the petitloner Part of Plot No.49, in Survey Nos.11l19, 7l/20 and lt/21, admeasuring 200 sq. yards,( Out of total admeasuring 1000 sq. yards), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, T.S. bounded by North: part of plot .t 2 SN, J wP 4154 2025 No.49; South: PIot No.50; East: Part of Plot No.49; West: 33' Ft Wide Road as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to receive application and to release the individual service connection without being influenced by the instructions of the Bth respondent and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and pr,rper in the intr:rest of I ustice. "

3. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing. on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 7 that, the subject issue in the present Writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this; Court dated 31.01.2025 passed in W.P. No.2733 of 2025 and hence, the present writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.

4. Takinq into consideration: a) 'fhe aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, b) The submissions put forth by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 7 and, 11 -l /' .L ., SN, J wP 4t54 2025 c) The fact that the petitioner had already made an application on 10.O2.2025 to the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to provide for 1 Domestic Connection, total Domestic Contract Load of 45OOO Watts, vide Reg. No.LTM25633OO25 to the petitioner part of plot No.49, in Survey Nos.11l19, LL/2O and LLl21, admeasuring 2OO Sq. yards, (Out of total admeasuring 1OOO sq. yards), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District, and the same is pending consideration by the respondent Nos.2 to 7, The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to consider the petitioner application dated 1O.O2.2025 and pass appropriate orders on the said application seeking to provide for 1 Domestic Connection, total Domestic Contract Load of 45OOO Watts, vide Reg. No.LTM256330025 to the petitioner part of plot No.49, in Survey Nos.11l19, L1./20 and LLl2L, admeasuring 2OO Sq. yards, (Out of total admeasuring 1OOO sq. yards), situated at Khanamet (V), Serilingampally (M), Under GHMC, Ranga Reddy District in accordance to law within a period of one (1) week from I I I , {' df' 4 the date of receipt of a copy of the order. shall be no order as to costs. SN, J wP-4154 2025 However, there The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// MA MURTHY REGISTRAR SD/- K.SREERA ASSISTANT )\ \ I \\- ! sEcrl ON OFFICER The Chairman-cum-ft4anaging Director, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad' Chief General ft4anager commerciil Mint Compound T G S P DC L' Hyderabad The Superintending Engineer, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Compahy Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad The Diviiional Engineer, Operation Kondapur TGSPDCL The Asst. Divir;ional Enginee, Operation Kondapur TGSPDCL The Assistant Engineer; SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Ailapur TGSiPDCL Greater Hyderabad tr/unicipal Corporation, Circle 20, Rep. by its Commissioner. Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. One CC to Srnt. Thakur Roopa Singh, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to CiP for Energy, High Coutl for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] O'ne CC to Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, SC for TGSPDCL[OPUC] One CC to Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, SC for Greater Hyderabad lvlunicipal CorporationIO P U C] Two CD Copiers tl-' - 'r4 To, 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 o I 10 11 12 TJ GJP B' HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:1 310212025 {-' !, ORDER WP.No.4154 of 2025 i(th 3 /4 14: ot' Y ) (-) 18 fiAB zffi ,:n, A- \. '{- )' Pz ,) DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS bV 1 .d:r