High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION NO:4500 OF 2018 Between: Mir Sultan Ali s/o. Late. Mir Hyder Ali, aged about 37 years, Ooc. Business, Rl/o. H.No. 21-4-592/1, Gulab Singh Street, Petla Burj, Hyderabad, T.S. Rep. by his GPA Sri Mohammed Haneed Quadri s/o. Late Azeemuddin Quadri aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, Ryo. 19-2- 29412951N3, Vattepally, Habeebnagar Cobny, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State Of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, at Gacchi Bowli, Hyderabad

6. The Deputy Cornmissioner of Police, Shamshabad, R.R.Dist. The Ass'rstant Comrnissioner of Police, Rajendranagar Diyisoin,R.R.Dist lnspector of Polioe, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.District The Sub lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court rnay be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more pa(icularly one in tlrc nature of Mardamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.5 AND 6 in interfering with the civil dispute subject matter of OS No. 210 of 2017 onthe file of Hon'ble ll Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District filed by the Petitiorrcr and OS f,lo. 98 of 2018 on the file of lX Addl Senior Civil Judge, Rarga Reddy District in respect of Pht No. 114 in Sy.No.10, admeasuring 200.00 Sq. yardsor equivalent to 168 sq. meters, situated at Balkrishna puram, Maitardevpally Village, GHMC Rajend ra naga r Cirte, Ranga Reddy District, T.S, threatening and harassing me as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional a r I violative of my fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21, 3O0 A of thr; l;onstitution of lndia and well settled law as rendered by this Honble Court as well rs Apex Court. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.S. and 6 not to interfere into the ci' ir dispute in respect of Plot No. 114 in Sy.No.'10, admeasuring 200.00 Sq. yards rr equivalent to 168 sq. meters, situated at Balkrishna puram, Mailardevp a ly Village, GHfi/C Rajendranagar Cirle, Ranga Reddy District, T.S or otherwis(, and harass me in any manner pending disposal of the Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Between: Miza Mohammed Majeedullah Baig, S/o.Mirza Mohammed Ar ned, aged about 30 years, Occ: Business, No.19-2-291N40, Model Town ,)olony, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. ...PETITIOI ERYPROPOSED R7 AND 1 Mir Sultan Ali sio. Late. Mir Hyder Ali, aged about 37 1,r ars, Occ. Business, R/o, H \o 21-4-59211, Gulab Singh Street, Petla Burj, it rderabad, T.S. Rep. by his GPA Sri Mohammed Hameed Quadri s/o. L5te \zeemuddin euadri . Occ. Business, No. 19-2- 29,1, 2gSlN3, Vattepally, aged about 50 years, Habeebnagar Colony, Hyderabad ... R,ESPOI\J 2. The State Of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary. l.i Secretariat, Hyderabad. )ENT/PETITIONER )me Department,

3. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, at Gacchi Bo,rr 4. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Sharnshabad, R.R.l 5. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar D i 6. lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.District 7. The Sub [nspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.Dis;t i Hyderabad st- soin, R. R. Dist ...RESPONDEtI' S/RESPONDENTS ----z P€tition under Sec{ion 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated h the affidavit filed in support of the .petit'on, the High Court may be pleased to imptead the petitioner herein as party Respondent No. 7 in the abo\€ W.P. No. 4500 of 2018, in the interest of justice. { lA NO: 3 OF 2018 Between: Mir Sultan Ali s/o. Late. Mir Hyder Ali, aged about 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 21-4-59211, Gulab Singh Street, Petla Burj, Hyderabad, T.S. Rep. by his GPA Sri Mohammed Harneed Quadri s/o. Late Azeemuddin Quadri aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, Ri/o. 19-2- ?P'4l2€'5lN3, Vattepally, Habeebnagar Colony, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER AND

1. The State Of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, at Gacchi Bowli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commisskrner of Police, Sharnshabad, R.R.Dist. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar Diyisoin,R-R.Dist 5. lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailadevpally, R.R.District 6. The Sub lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.District ...RESPONDENTS 7. M'irza Mohammed Majeedullah Baig, S/o.Mirza Moharnmed Ahmed, aged about 30 years, Occ: Business, No.19-2-291N40, Model Town Colony, Jahanuma, Hyderabad. ... PROPOSED RESPONDENT No.7 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased t'o arry Mr. Mohammed Majeedullah Ba(1 S/o. Mirza Mohammed Ahmed as Respordent No. 7 in the writ petition and the lnterlocutory Applications in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED MOUNIS ABIDI Counsel for the Respondents No.1to6: SRI O.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER t r---__- ': )\ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUIT ARAMJI WRIT PETTTIO N No. 45OO of2Ol ,.i I ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 223 of Constitution of India seeking the following reliel "...to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction mor one in the nature of Maldamus declaring the t Respondents No. 5 AND 6 in interfering with th': subject matter of OS No. 2lO of 2Ol7 on the fil: eddl. Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy Distric'- Petitioner and OS No. 98 of 2018 on t],e file of I) Civil Judge, Ralrga Reddy District in respect of Pl' Sy.No.1O, admeasuring 2OO.O0 Sq. yards or equir sq. meters, situated at Ballcishna puram, ! ViJlage, GHMC Rajendranagar Cirle, Ralga Reddlr threatening and harassing me as arbitr unconstitutional and violative of my funda:r guaranteed under Article 2I, 30O A of tJle Constih and well settled law as rendered by tl:is Honble ' as Apex Court and Pass..." particularlY ction of the civil dispute cf Honble II filed by the Addl Senior t No. 114 in alent to 168 ailardevpally District, T.S, ry, illegal, :ntal rights tion of India )ourt as well

2. None appears for the petitioner.

3. Heard Mr. D.Pradeep, learned Assista rt Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

4. The learned Assistant Government Ple a ler, on written instructions, submits that, based on the rePrert entations of the petitioner, Crime No. 25 of 2Ol8 and Crime No. 26 of 2OlB were registered. As part of the investigation, the peti ioner's presence was secured, and he was directed to furnir;. L details of the property tax pertaining to the disputed house 5 roperties. It was subsequently revealed ttrat the ovunership of the said properties is the subject matter of civil disputes in O.S. No. 21O of 2Ol7 on the file of the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, and O.S. No. 94 of 20lg on the file of the learned IX Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. Hence, the contention that the respondent-police are interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the subject properties is untenable. In the absence of any material substantiating such interference, the learned Assistant Government pleader prays for dismissal of the writ petition. I have perused the material available on record.

5. 6 . The petitioner contends that the respondent- police authorities, particularly respondent Nos. 5 and 6, are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, which are already the subject matter of O.S. No. 2lO of 2Ol7 on the frle of the learned II Additiona.l Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, and O.S. No. 94 of 2Ol8 on the file of the learned IX Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. 7 . Having regard to the said assertion and kt:r ping in view the well-settled principle that the police have no rc'l : to play in civil disputes, even when any criminal proceedings z Court finds it appropriate to issue necer; re pending, this rary directions. Accordingly, respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are directe I to refrain from interfering in the civil disputes between the pt Litioner and the unoflicial respondents in any manner. However', it is made clear that any action taken by the Police autht,r ities strictly in accordance with law and by following due pro,: rss shall remain unaffected.

8. With the above said direction, this writ pr:r ition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, sh dl stand closed. SD'. M. NAGAMANI ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secreta),iai Telangana State, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda, at Gacchi EI wli, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Shamshabad, R.r Dist. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Rajendranagar I tiyisoin,R.R.Dist 5. lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R.District 6. The Sub lnspector of Police, P.S. Mailardevpally, R.R. ) strict 7. One CC to SRI SYED MOUNIS ABlDl, Advocate. [OPU ]l 8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State ,r Telangana. [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies. BSK TJ tu, HIGH COURT DATED:2911012025 lHt rA ( if) ' ._) .,') t. r. it1 6 z '\E:ti: -1( * ORDER WP.No.4500 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (9-. J?S z<l-lzs