Dadi Appa Rao v. Surisetti Bhudevi
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
1. Dadi Appa Rao, S/o. Sri Ramunaidh.
2. Vuppalapu Kasulu, S/o. Narasayya Naidu.
3. Vuppalapu Govindu, S/o. Narayana Naidu . AND Appellants
S m t . Surisetti Bhudevi, W/o. Appalanaidu, Occ: Household, R/o. Isukathota, Visakhapatnam.
S m t . Pilla Anasuyamma, W/o. Appa Rao, Occ: Household, R/o. Isukathota, Visakhapatnam.
A l l a Apparao, S/o. Mutyalu, Timmarajupeta, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ..Respondents The Appeal coming on for hearing as to admission and upon perusing the Appeal and grounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated. 21-09-2007 & 12-10-2007 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri O. Manohar Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and of Smt. N (P) Anjana Devi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, and of Sri P. Satyanarayana, Advocate for the respondents 2 & 3. The Court made the following ORDER: “ The interim stay granted by this Court on 21-09-2007 is extended by three more weeks from today. List the second appeal for ‘admission’ after two weeks.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The VI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
2. The Senior Civil Judge, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District. 3. S m t . Surisetti Bhudevi, W/o. Appalanaidu, Occ: Household, R/o. Isukathota, Visakhapatnam.
S m t . Pilla Anasuyamma, W/o. Appa Rao, Occ: Household, R/o. Isukathota, Visakhapatnam.
A l l a Apparao, S/o. Mutyalu, Timmarajupeta, Atchutapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
One CC to Sri O. Manohar Reddy, Advocate (OPC)
One spare copy. SAH HIGH COURT DSRVJ DATED: 26-10-2007 NOTE: LIST THE SECOND APPEAL FOR ‘ADMISSION’ AFTER TWO WEEKS ORDER SA.NO. 1030 OF 2007 EXTENDING THE INTERIM STAY DRAFTED BY: SAH APPROVED BY: DRAFTED ON: 08-11-2007 HIGH COURT DSRVJ DATED: 26-10-2007 NOTE: LIST THE SECOND APPEAL FOR ‘ADMISSION’ AFTER TWO WEEKS ORDER SA.NO. 1030 OF 2007 EXTENDING THE INTERIM STAY
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 26 Oct 2007. The bench was D S R VARMA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.