High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly orre in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Manual Tender Notification vide Case No.C1|122(B)12024-RM:NZB dated.03 02.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent calling up fresh tender in respect of DOT Stall No.15 of lndira BTC Bus Stand, Banswada, Kamareddy District, which was constructed under DOT (Deposit, Operate and Transfer) scheme, in the year, 2007, without reconsidering the request of the petitioner for extension of lease, and contrary to directions issued by this Hon'ble Court in WP No.187212025 dated.24.01.2025, is highly illegal, arbitrary. unjust, unconstitutional, and in violation of principles of natural justice, and set aside the same to extent of petitioner's case is concerned, and consequently direct the respondents herein to extend the license period for remaining period of five (5) years in respect of subject stall. lA NO: 'l OF 2025 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Manual Tender Notification vide Case No.C1l122(8)t2024-RIVI NZB dated.03.02.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent to extent of petitioner's c;ase is concerned, by directing the respondents to exteQd the license to the petitroner for remaining period of five (5) years from 01'0'1 .2025 onwaids in respect of DOT Stall No.15 of lndira RTC Bus Stand, Banswada, Kamareddy District whrch was constructed under DOT (Deposit, Operate and Transfer) scheme, in the year, 2007, pending disposal of the writ Pglition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R.ANURAG, SC FOR TSRTC The Court made the following: ORDER {.t HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA w T PETITIO No 2A F2 o RDER: Heard Sri Mohd. Moin Ahmed Quadri, tearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petit'oner and Sri R'Anurag' learned Standing Counsel for TSRTC, appearing on behalf of the respondents- ra ro r

2.7 as under: "...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Manual Tender Notification vide Case No.C1l122(B)/2024-RM:NZB dated 03'02'2025 issued by the 2nd respondent calling up fresh tender in respect of DOT Stall No.15 of Indira RTC Bus Stand' Banswada, Kamareddy District, which was constructed under DOT (Deposit, Operate and Transfer) scheme' in the year, 2007, without reconsidering the request of the petitioner for extension of lease, and contrary to directions issued by this Hon'ble Court in WP No.187212025 dated'.24.07.2025, is highlv illegal' arbitrary, uniust, unconstitutional, and in violation of prlnciples of natural justice, and set aside the same to extent of petitioner's case is concerned' and consequently direct the respondents herein to extend the license period for remaining period of five (5) years 2 SN,J -4028 _2025 \vp in respect of subject stall, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner is the lease holder of the shop of Indira RTC Bus Stand, Banswada and he is doing business at road margin of RTC Bus Stand. In the year, 2007, to remove the road margin vendors and for the expansion of road, the Government promised the petitioner to {' allot shops in the newly constructed building under DOT Scheme for a period of twenty (20) years, for which the petitioner agreed. After completion of construction of shops, initially, the petitioner was granted the lease for a period of five (5) years on a fair monthly rent and the said lease was extended trom time to time, and was valid till the end oF December, 2024. \t is further the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is further entitled for getting remaining five (5) years lease i.e., upto, December, 2029 as per resolution No.133/2007, dated 24.10.2007, however, the said lease is not being extended. Though this Court vide its order dated 24.01.2025 in W.P.No.1872 of 2025, directed the respondents to re-consider the case of the petitioner for extension of lease for further period of five years up to 11 .i- -t SN,J w 4028 2025 December, 2029 within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of the said order and till such time, the respondents were directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject stall, the respondent-corporation issued Manual Tender Notification vide Case No.Clll22(B)12024-RM:NZB dated 03.02.2025 calling up fresh tender in respect of the DOT Stall No.15 of Indira RTC Bus Stand, Banswada, Kamareddy District. Aggrieved by the said action of the respon dent-corpo ration, which is in clear violation of the orders of this Court, dated 24.01.2025 passed in { W.P.No.1872 of 2025, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

4. Sri R.Anurag, learned Standlng Counsel for TSRTC appearing on behalf of the respondents placed on record the proceedings dated 07 .01.2025 vide No.LCl785(70)/2024- RM:NZB of the Regional Manager, Nizamabad i.e., respondent No.2 herein and contends that the order of this Court dated

24.0L.2025 passed in W.P.No.1872 of 2025 had been duly complied with and the request of the petitioner for extension of lease period of DOT stalls for another five years in accordance to law had been reconsidered by the respondent corporation duly considering the specific plea of the petitioner that the petitioner I I I ; I 4 :::. SN,J \\,p 4028 2025 had contributed certain amounts for construction of shops and appropriate reasoned orders hdd been passed and to ensure transparency and fairness, it is just and necessary that auction needs to be conducted and the request of the petitioner to run petitioner's business for a further period of five years, cannot be accepted.

5. Ta kinq into consid eration: a) The submissions made by the learned counset appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for TSRTC appearing on behalf of the respondent-corporation and, b) The proceedings of respondent No.2 dated 07.OL.2025 vide No.LCl785(70)/2O24-RM:NZB issued in compliance to the orders of this Court dated 24.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.1"872 of 2025, The writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said proceedings dated 07.O1.2()25 issued by the respondent No.2-Regional Manager, TGSRTC, Nizamabad. In view of the fact as borne on record that the proceedings of the respondent t I 5 SN.J wp_4028 2025 No.2 dated 07.OL.2O25 had been issued in pursuance to the petitioner approaching this Court by filing the present writ petition, a reasonable period of one (O1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order is granted to the petationer to pursue the petitioner's remedies' The respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner for a period of one (O1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to enable the petationer to pursue the remedies as are available to the petitioner against the order of the 2nd respondent dated 07.O1.2025. However, there shall be no order as to costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions' if any pending, in the Writ Petition shall also sta nd closed. SD/-T. JAYASREE NT REGISTRAR ASS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ehivan. RTC--X-Road, HYderabad

1. The Managing Drrector' Telangana State Road Transport Corporation' Bus ' 2. The Regional Manager, TGSRTC, Nizamabad' Nizamabad District' 3. The Depot Manager, TGSRTC, Bansada Depot' Kamareddy District' 4. One CC to SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI' Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI R.ANURAG, SC FoR TSRTC [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies BSR KT BS HIGH COURT DATED: 13t0212025 CC TODAY 1$E STATE ( q i 'ts lttuq ?ffi \. ,t / ORDER WP.No.4028 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 6c {(" w