The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly on in the nature of WRIT OF IUANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 sending a letter No.81245812024 D1.O7.12.2024 to the Respondent No.2 requesting to cancel NALA Proceedings No.200494406 Dt.08.08.2024 issued by I the Respondent No.3 on the representation of the Respondent No.5 and trying to cancel the proceedings d1.08.08.2024 by the Respondent No.2, without considering the representation dt.'1 5.01 .2025 is illegal, arbitrary consequently to direct the Respondent No.2 not to take any action basing on the letter sent by the Respondent No.2 vide retter No.B/24 s}r2o24 Dt.or.12.2o 14 without giving any Notice to petitioner lA NO: 'l OF 2o25 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the c i cumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court rr ry be preased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the retter No.B/24ri t/2024 Dt.07.12.2024 sent by the Respondent No.2 to the Respondent No.3 s reking to cancer the NALA Proceedings No.200494406 Dt.08.08.2024 in rer;,ect of the land in SY.No.259AA/'1 , of peddamberpet Kalan Vi,age, A I lullapurmet Mandal Rangareddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Greenhills Colonv Welfare Association, .Bup Uy its p. sident, B.Narsireddv S/o.Satnireddv Aoe se vears, Rl/o.Fi.No.6_ii+''-eo,r,lrb;;;;..'ti;iffi;,r. Vittage, Choutuppa-r tVandai, V;"dri ijh;;;;biJil.i" ...Petiti,'ner/5th Respondent Thattic-heftu Yadagiri Goud, S/o.Siramulu, Age RIo.H.No.4-10'1, -peddamberppet Viflige,"- Rangareddy District, 52 1ear, occ Abdu lapurmet Business, Mandal, AND 1 ...Rr: ;pondenUPetitioner 2. The State of Telanoana, Rep by its principal ;ecretary, Revenue Depa rtment, Secretaria't Hyderat-50. -' 3. The District Coilector, Rangareddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet t\/andal Rangareddy Distrir t. 5. The Sub Registrar, peddamberpet, at peddamberpet, Ra rgareddy District. ) ...Respondents/Res;1 ,qndgnl Nos. 1 to 4 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circ t mstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court ray be preased to vacate the interim order passed in l.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.F .No.407 9 of 2025, dated: 13 02 2025, and consequenry dismiss the main w.p.r,r r.4079 0t 2025, by imposing exemplary costs on the Writ petitioner, Counset for the petitioner : SRt SRIDYLNCHARYULU 'AKA'AH, COUNSEL REPRESENTING 9gyl:gl.l". the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRt L. RAVINDER, AGp FOR REVENUE 9glt:l for the Respondent No. s : SRt CHANDRASEKHAR REDDy GOpt REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER h, l I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF'I', )LANGANA AT TTYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VEI\I IGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.4O79 of 2025 Dated: 23.12.2025 Between: Thattichettu Yadagiri Goud .. . P: .itioner And The State of Telangala, represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department ar1d four others ORDER Respondents This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 )f Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "... to issue zrny order or direction writ or particulzrrly one in the nature of WRIT OF I declaring the action of ttLe Respondent No.3 senc No.Bl2a58l2024 Dt.O7.72.2024 to the Resprn requesting to calcel NALA Proceedings N,r Dt.08.08.2024 issued by the Respondent Nr represenration of the Respondent No.s and trying t proceedings dt.O8.O8.2O24 by the Respondent I\( considering the representation dt.15.01.2025 arbitrary consequently to direct the Respondent take anl' action basing on the letter sent by the No.2 vide letter No.B/2458 /2024 Dt.O7 .I2.2O24 n1 any Notice to me and pass such other order or ord,r wits more ,ANDAMUS ng a letter dent No.2 200494406 3 on t}le calcel the .2, u.ithout is illegal, ,1o.2 not to lespondent hout giving s ..."

2. Heard Mr.Yakaiah, learned counsel representing Mr.D.Y.N.L.N.Char1,ulu, learned counsel for he petitioner, Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistart Governmen Pieader for Revenue representing iearned Government Plea,l :r for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4 and Mr., )handrasekhar \:4t \ - Reddy Gopi Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.5. perused 2 the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.3 had issued Nala Proceedings No.240.04944O6 dated

08.08.2024 by converting the agricultural land admeasuring 4cs.3.1800 gts into non-agricultural lald out of total extent of land admeasuring Acs.4.1200 gts in Sy.No.259A/1 situated at Pedda Amberpet (Ka1al) Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District. Aggrieved thereby, unofficial respondent No.5 has filed grievance application on 25.09.2024. Later, respondent No.3 had addressed a letter No.Bl2458l2024 dated

07.12.2024 to respondent No.2 seeking to issue necessary instructions for cancellation of said Nala proceedings dated O8.O8.2024, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, which is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. Therefore, he seeks to pass appropriate orders. 4 . Learned counsel for respondent No.5 submits that the lalds for which the conversion permission has been grarrted lvere already disposed of in favour of various persons and suppressing the said facts the petitioner had obtained the Nala proceedings dated 08.08.2024. Hence, respondent No.3 had t J addressed a letter to respondent No'2 requesting no to entertaln any sale transactions in respect of lands rdmeasuring Acs.3.180Lr gts in Sy.No.25gp.l1 situated at Perl la Amberpet (Ka1an) Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal' Rangarer:' y District to avoid multiplicity of litigations' 5. Learned Assistant Government Pieader lor Revenue contends that the case of the petitioner is under consideration before respondent No.2 and the petitioner ought t: have filed his objections if an-v, before respondent No'2' Inslt ad' petitioner he states that rushed to this Court a premature stage' Therefort ' the Writ Petition is misconceived and seeks to di miss the Writ Petition

6. Having regard to the submissions of ali the I :arned counsel and on perusal of the materiat available on reo 'rd' this Court lvithout making any observations on the meritr; or demerits of the case, deem s it appropriate to direct the petit oner to file his objections if anv before respondent No'2' within I week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order' On filing I uch objections' respondent No.2 is directed to consider the ame and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law' as expeditiousll' as possible, by putting the inter.' sted parties on I I _,_ -' r -a[-TlDt 4 notice and affordlng them sufflcient opportunity of hearing. Till hling of the objections, the parties to this Writ Petition are directed to maintain status quo obtaining as on date in all respects. 7 . With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of No costs- Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/-A.V.S. P DEPUTY R TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Rangareddy District. 3. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal Rangareddy District'

4.TheSubRegistrar,Peddamberpet,atPeddamberpet,RangareddyDistrict' 5. One CC to SRI D Y L N CHARYULU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY GOPI REDDY, Advocate loPUCl T.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana' Iour]

8. Two CD Copies PVL BS I t t HIGH COURT DATED:2311212025 I ORDER WP.No.4079 of 2025 a O 0j ii tI /,J 0 'i' I \:\-('... " aa'.42' -7 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \#' T