The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a proper writ order or orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus.declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing the Cheques for the amount under Rythu Bandhu Scheme to the petitioners Agricultural Lands toan extentof Ac.2-00guntas in Survey No.317, to an extentof Ac.2-11guntas in Survey No. 481/AA, to an extent of Ac. 1-20 guntas in Survey l'lo. 327lE, to an extent of Ac.0-15 guntas in Survey No. 326, to an extentof Ac.4-38 guntas in Survey No. 325, to an extent of Ac. 6-23 guntas in Survey No. 315/A, to an extent of Ac. 22-26 guntas in Survey No. 316 and to an extent of Ac. 5-10 guntas in . :r I \l ,/:/ Survey Nc,. 319/A toAl to extent of Ac. 45-23 guntas situated at Karakonda village, issuing the same to others including discriminative and violative of Article 14 of thr: of lndia and consequenfly issue a direction to the respondents to issue the cheques for the entifled amount to the petitioners above said Agricultural lands. ,:. .q ,": {i liii:,:' Perition undlr section 'rsl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to issue a direction to the respondents to issue cheques to the petitioner Agricurturar Lands to an ext€)nt of Ac. 2iroo€untas. in. Survey No. 317, to an extent of Ac. 2_11 guntas in Survey No. aSllAi, to an extent of Ac. 1-20 guntas in Survey No. 327 tE, to an extent of Ac. 0-15 guntas in Survey No. 326, to an extent of Ac. 4_3g guntas in Survey Nr.325, to an e)dent of Ac. 6-23 guntas in Survey No. 315/A, to an extent ot Ac. 22-Xi guntas in Survey No. 3i6 and to an extent of Ac. 5_10 guntas in survey No. 319/A total to elitent of Ac. 4s-23 guntas situated at Karakonda viflage, Madgula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith pending disposar of the writ Petition in the interest ofjustice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A RAMAKRTSHNA Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE The Couft made the.following: ORDER TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL OF ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is liled seeking the following relief "...to issue a proper writ order or orders partianlarlA one in the nahtre of Writ of Mandamus declaing the action of the respondents in not issuing the Cheques for the amount under Rytlut Bandhu Sclrcme to the petitioners Agricultural Lands to an ertent of Ac.2.OO guntas in Suruey No.317 to an ertent of Ac.2.71 guntas in Surueg No.481/AA to an extent of Ac.1.2O guntas in Surueg No.327/E to an extent of Ac.O.15 guntas in Surueg No.326 to an ertent of Ac.4.38 guntas in Suruey No.325 to an extent of Ac.6.23 guntas in Suruey No-315/A to an ertent of Ac.22.26 guntas in Suruey No.316 and to an extent of Ac.5.70 guntas in Suruey No.319/ A total to extent of Ac.45.23 gantas sifitated at Kalakonda Village, Madgula Mand.at, Ranga Reddy District while issuing the same to others includirtg the petitioners brother is arbitrary illegal and disciminatiue and uiolatiue of Article 14 of tle constitution of India and anseqtently issue a directiort to the respondents to issue the Cheqtes for the entitled amount to the petitioners aboue said. Agria.tlfiiral lands and to pass... "

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.l to 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture, for respondent Nos.5 and 6 and perused the record. . z

3. l.earned counsel appearing for the petitioner would subnrit the petitioner is t]le absolute owner and possessor of the zrgricultural land to an extent of Ac.2.o0 guntas in Survey No.317, to an extent of Acs.2.11 guntas in survey No.4g I /AA, to an extent of Ac.1.2O guntas in Survey No.32Z/8, to an exte:nt of Ac.o.15 guntas in Surve5r No.326, to an extent of Acs.4.38 guntas in Survey No.325, to an extent of Acs.6.23 gunr:as in Survey No.3 15 A, to an extent of Acs.22.26 guntas in siurvey No.316 and to €rn extent of Acs.S.lo guntas in surrey No.3 L9 /A, total to extent of Ac.45.23 guntas, situated at F.alakonda Village, Madgula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Recently, the Government of relanga.na has introduced a sch:me "Rythu Bandhu' for the benefit of the agriculturists. Un<ler the said scheme the Government is paving Rs.5,0o0/- per acre as first installment and Rs.S,ooo /- pe, acre as sccond inst:allment, total Rs.lo,ooo/- per acre for the development of agricultural land as well as investment of raising the crops.

4. Petitioner made €rn application for issuance of fresh pas;sbooks and also benefits under trre Rythu Barrdhu scheme along with his brother and after a great persuasion, fresh lrdlii*-' -.. .. ...--r-,,l**-.:. ::3:: pattadar passbooks have been issued, but the cheques under the Ryttru Bandhu scherne were not issu'ed in spite of much efforts and repeated requests. The action of respondents in not issuing the cheques is artitrary and illegal. Hence, the present writ Petition. learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for 5. respondent Nos. L to 4 would submit that since the representation made by the petitioner is dated 29-ll.2Ol9 and frorn then till now 6long Jrears have elapsed. Hence, seeks direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation' Upon Iiling such representation, the respondent authorities will consider the sarne and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. \ \ \

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture, for respondent Nos.S and 6 by filing counter n'ould submit that for granting Rythu Bandhu, the name of the petitioner has to be recommended by the Chief Commissioner for Land Administration(CCLA).Unlessthenameofthepetitioneris recommended by the ccLA, respondent No.5 is handicapped in issuing the said scheme. i t t ! i t I I t t I I I I I I I I , I I I ! I I I ii4'.i

7. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, this Writ Petition is dis;posed of, directing the petitioner to submit afresh repre{ientation by enclosing all the relevant documents to respo:edent Nos.3 and 4 and it is for respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consirler the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with taw. If respondent Nos.3 qnd 4 is not inclined to accept the r:equest made by tJle petitioners, they shall pass a reasoned order, communicate copy of the said order to the petitioner and complete the said exercise within a period of six (O6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ther,e shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed SD'- SMT. B. REKHA RANI STANT REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY'/ CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue DivisionalOfficer, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy Cristrict.

4. The Tahsildar, Madgula Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. I'he Deputy Commiisioner, Agriculturc Department Malakpet, Hyderabad 6. I'he Treasury Officer, O/o Treasury Office Mojamjahi Market, Hyderabad. 7. One CC to Sri A. Ramakrishna, Advocate IOPUC] 8. I wo CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at t{yderabad [OUT]

9. '-wo CD Copies TJ MMT cHe HIGH COURT DATED:2810812025 ORDER WP.No.4389 of 2020 ,\ HE STA j?. 2 I JAt,l 202$ 6);. * f.r * ,t:() DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Lvl? e\\26