✦ High Court of India · 13 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Feb 2025
Length
1,634 words

4. Sri Venkateswara Creations, Plot No' 132 and 133, B-2-2931K1133' ' ru;;lr;;;iaotonv, sri Naqar Colonv, Hvderabad, 500073 Rep' bv its Foundei'V. Venkaia Ramana Reddy (alias Dil Raju) ...RESPONDENTS I I lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma y be pleased to suspend the lmpuoned Order dated 2410112025 in W. P. No.'l 184 of 2025 and pending the disposal of the present Writ Appeal Counsel for the Appellants: SRI S. NIRANJAN REDDY REP., FOR Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MD SULTANA BASHA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: -- Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI PASHAM MOHITH \^trRlT APPEAL NO: 190 OF 2 o25 Writ Appeal under c;lause '1 5 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against Order Dated 2410112025 Passerl :r WP No '1 184 of 2025 on the file of the High Court Between: It4u_ltiplex Ass,rciation of lndia Federation House, Tanseng lVarg, New Delhi - .1 10001 Rep hry V Kiran Kumar Sumendar Flecdy, Shareholder of PVR-INOX Cinemas Age. l:i3 Occ. l\,4anager "rvs Finance and Accounts S/o RajiReddy, Rl/o Flat No avenue, Power Nagar, Kukatpally Hyderabad- 500018 i O 1 ,l\,,lahadevs - ...LEAVE PETITIONERSiAPPELLANTS 1 2 AND 1 Satish Kamaal. S/o. K. Ramulu 7-89, Santhinagar Colony, Ch;tnda Nagar, Ranga Redc y t)istrict, Telangana 500050 ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

2. The State of Terlang Department, Dr B R 500022 ana, Rep by its Principal Secretary. Ho.re (General -A) Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat Hyderabad 2 4 The Telang.ana State Film/Television and Theatre Developmert, Corporation, Rep By.its MqlqgilO Director, 10-2-1,FDC Complex, A.C. Guaids, Hyderabad 50C028. fvl/s. Mythri l\,4ovie lt/akers LLp, plot No 58,3rd Floor, Road No.72, Aswini Layout, Journalirt 99]g!V, Jubitee Hills, Hyderabad, Telanganra, SOOO:3 Rep. oy rts lJirectc,r <avt Shankar yalamanchili ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 24.01 .2025 in WP 33923 of 2024' in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellants: SRI S. Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON Counsel for the Respondent No.1: P SRINIVASA REDDY NIRANJAN REDDY REP., FOR SRI M. SULTAN BASHA REP., FOR SRI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Counsel for the Respondent No.4: I WRIT APPEAL NO: '191 OF 2025 SRI K. SIDDHARTH RAO writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against order Dated 24101t2025 Passed in WP No 1184 of 2025 on the file of the High Court' Between: 1 2 Multiplex Association of lndia, Federation House' Tanseng.lVlarg, New Delhi - '1 10001 Rep by V Kiran Kumar Sumendar Reddy, Shareholder of PVR-INOX Cinemas Age.33. Occ' f\ilanager Finance and Aicounts S/o RajiReddy, Fl/o Flat No. 101 ,lVahadev' s rvs avenue, Power Nagar, Kukatpally Hyderabad- 5000'18 ...LEAVE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS AND 1 2 ? 4 Gorla Bharat Raj, S/o Gorla Chandra Shekar A-24l1 , Lab Qrts, Kanchanbagh Hyderabad, 500058 ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home (General -A) Oepartment, Or A H nmbeOkarielangana State Secretariat Hyderabad 500022 Commissioner of Police, Rep by Hyderabad City Police (Cinemas licensing ^ nrii,iiiitvi, o)" Commissioner oi pcitice, Tower-A, lccc Building, Road No '12' Banjara-Hills, Hyderabad, 500034. Sri Venkateswara Creations, Plot No. 132 and 133,8-2-2931K1133, Kamalapuri Colonv. S;iNaqar Colonv' Hvderabad, 500073 Rep by its Founder V' Venka'ti Ramana Reddv (alias Dil Raju) ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2l2ai Petition unCer Section 15'1 CpC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Order dated 24lO1t2O2S in W.p.No..1 189 of 2025 and pending the disposa of the present Writ Appeal Counsel for the Appellant: SRt A. VENKATESH REp., FOR Ms. ttUBAtNA S KHATOON Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MAHESH MAMINDLA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: -- Counsel for the Respondent NO.4: SRI PASHAM MOHITH WRIT APPEAL NO: 1 92 0F 2025 writ Appeal under clause '15 of the Letters patent preferred agains. the order dated 2410112025 passed rn W.P.No. 37007 of 2024 on the file of the Hioh Court. Between: 1 2 M.u]!ple1 Ass,r:iation of lndia, Federation House, Tanseng Ivlarg, New Delhi _ 110001 Rep L,y V Kiran Kumar P,iT:i^drll"dpy, Sharehotder of pVR-tNOX Cinemas Age-33 Occ- Manager r-rnance an,l Accounts S/o RajiReddy, R/o Flat trto_ I Ot tt/ahadevs "rvs avenue, Power Nagar, Kukatpally Hydeiabad_ 500018 AND 1 2 3 4 5 ...LEAVE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS lr,4allanglSai ry-or /br Upp '\./ 5 Office. Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet, Hyderabdd, Telangana _ 500033 \:.qV_ tg9OV, S/o lVallangi Vivekananda Reddy ptot No. 31, Road ...RESPONDENTA/VRIT pETTTIONER The State of lelangana, Rep by_its principal Secretary, Home (General _A) '' Department, nr a R Rmbedkar feiangini Stite beir6tariat H y'derabad 500022 commissioner rf Police, Rep by Hyderabad city porice (cinerras Licensino Al$glrty), 9,q ,lommissioner oi pirrice, Tower-A, rCcC AuirJi,is. n-oal r.roi z, Eanjara Ht s, Hyderabad, 500034. Qhikkadpally Police Station, Rep by. Station House Officer, CF:4V plus FFV, chikkadb pa,i 6 st, .rawa rrar r\-isii, Hn;r;i;;s;;, Hvll"ii ur,t, T6ffg;";' 500020 Sandhya Theatre, 35 A/M, Rep by. Cinemas License Hotder. F.TC X Rd, opp. Pgy^qrglli Restaurant, Zamistdnpirr, Himiyalnag;r, iyjerabac , fetangai5"' 500020 ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order dated 2410112025 in WP 37007 of 2024, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A. VENKATESH REP., FOR Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI R VIJAY GOPAL . T Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI MAHESH RAJE GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI G ARUN KUMAR Tle Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT '1. ,t' THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJoY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL Nos.189 190 LgL &, 192 oI 2o25 COMMON J_UIGIEENI (Per the Hon'ble tlrc Acting Chief Ju';tice Sujog Paul)'. Sri Si. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senibr Coursel represents Ms. Rubaina S Khatoon, learned counsel for the appellants 1n W.A.Nos.189 & 19O of 2025; Sri A. Venkatesh, I earned Senior Counsel represents Ms. Rubajna S Khatoon, learnrrd counsel for the appellarts in W.A.Nos.19i & 192 of 2025; Sri M. Sultan Basha, r Iearned co,l,rsel for respondent No.1 in W.A.No.189 of 2O25; Sri M. Sultan Ba,sha, learned counsel represents Sri P. S rinivas Reddy, learned cctrrrsel for respondent No. 1 in W.A.No.l9O of 2025; Sri Mahes;t Raje, learned Government Pleader 1or Home, for responclen - NIo.2 in all the writ appeals and Sri K. Siiddharth Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.4 in W.A.No.19O ol' 2025 2 Matters, being similar, were heard analogously.

3. Afler arguing for some time, learned Senior Oounsel for the appellants seek to withdraw these appeals rvith iiberty to frle application s for impleadment and vacating the ,stay order in pending wrr t petitions with further liberty to mention the writ petitions beit,re the learned Single Judge for hearing on vacate stay application s,

4. The other side has no objection. i1

5. This Court has no doubt, if after frling applications for 2 impleadment and vacate stay petitions, mentioned memos are prayed for seeking out of turn listing, learned Single Judge will look into it expeditiously.

6. With aforesaid observation, the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. , To, S D/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO PUTY REGISTRAR E //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRl. [/D SULTANA BASHA Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI PASHAM MOHITH Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI MAHESH MAMINDLA Advocate IOPUCI 5. One CC to SRI G ARUN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI R VIJAY GOPAL ' T Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRI K. SIDDHARTH RAO Advocate [OPUC] B. One CC to SRI P SRINIVASA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 'l0.Two CD CoPies KKS w GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1310212025 i) HE S14 16 ,( g olilAy z[zs

6.( z .\ COMMON ORDER WA.Nos. 1 89, 1 90, 1 I 1 &192 of 2025 t 9t S PAT CY\etl t DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEALS AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \w- r3coP(n[ 15Oar

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments