High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit ri[J in"r"*itn, the High court may be pleased -tg,l::rg an appropriate Writ, oraer-ol Jir"",,on particularly one in the -in-irrring nature of Writ of Mandam-us declaring tt.-""iiggr Jr tn" ie"ponuenir Proceedings No. F/6606/2ffr5 dored'iz-gg-fona as arbitrary, iilegar, without jurisdiction and vioration of Articre ra, is ,"Jio6-e or tn. constitution of India and violative of principres of Naturar iustice consequenay direct the respondent not to interfere with the oossession of tne petiironei-in respect of survey No. 356-' :9T?.rliis.l:. 5-1d-juntas or eact oit[e'p"iiii"r,"* No. 1 t64 and Ac. 5_18 guntas of Petitioner No. 5_and 6 of pregnapu, Viffrg", Gazwel Mandal, Medak Diskict. F 2015 P.NO: 51431 r.A. NO: 10F 201 p",i,,on under Section 151 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated " in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cogrt-f.{Y be pleased ihe proceedin;;'N" F/660'6{2045 dated 22- 0e-2015 of the 3rd ;r;;;"; ,"sfonJent in respect or-Su*"y No 356 admeasuring Ac 5-18 guntas each of pliition"r, No. 1 io 4 and Ac. 5-18 guntas of Petitioner No.5 and 6 situated at -Medak District pending disposal of the writ Fi"gnrpur Village, cazwel Mandal, Petition and Pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. K GOVIND ''- Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1 to 4 : GP FOR REVENUE'- The Court made the following: ORDEry-- ' ,, c-_?--y' ,:7 '"/ THE HONOURABLE SI(I ITJSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PEl- T"1'IO N No.39851 of 2015 ORDER: . Heard learned counscl for thc, petitioners and Sri.H.Rakesh Kumar, learned Assistant Governmeni plcailcr [,or. Jlevenuc appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4. With their consent, lhis wr.ri pctition is taken up lor disposal. 2 This writ petition is filecl seeking following praycr: . 1 t r , t t r I t _dcclarc '.!).t)e.,t-tt" llp nclion of ilt,' t , , ','t,o I t t \ i, t..rrt.\ l,ro,,.r,lings No.f/o606p015 datcd ,,, ,,,.,, ,rnry- iiig'ri ,,,tt,o,,t jurisdiction antl tioLntiott o.f ltrtitie 14, .19 nrui SbO,q ol tht ('onstilution of Irulin nnd rrol:ttt(\.u/ prttttiplcs of N,iti,r)t 1,,,,'i',', consequently direct the resp,,n,lp-y ,,ot io inirrlr* tuith tlte possession of the petitioner in respcct of Suruey No.SiO oj*c sLu.tng Ac.-5-78 gurtas of each of tlrc petitilners Ii, 1 ;-;"nlnA Ar.S_lS guntas of petitioner No.i nnrt 6 of pregntnpttr'- Vitt'oii, Crrr,"t Mn t r dal, Medak Dist rit L.', 3' Brief facts in this writ petition are t'at the petitioners craims that their great g'and father sri.Narsaiar'r lras suc.eeclecr ra,cl aclmeasuring Ac.30.c0, in Sy.No,356, Pregnapur Village, Cazwc.l \4.,rcial, Medak Distri*. J.^ereaftcr, the petitioners' father have succeedetr hrs srrarc a.d after rris death, petitiu-rers through partition got t'cir sha,e to an extcrlt o{ land aclmeasuring Ac.5-1g gts each an<i thereafter' the petitioners were in peacefur possession of the subject property' Further case is that the responcic:nt No.3 issuecl impugned notices bearing Proc'No F/660 6/ 2015 dated 22.09 2075, wherein it is srated that the respondent No.4 in the report clatecl 31.0,J.2015, informcd that the Collector (S&LRs), Medak District at Sangarecltl r, r rdl filc bearing No.C3l995lt989 dated 13.12.1997, inJormed that the land i^ sy No 356', situated at l?regnapur viilage is Governtuent land Aggrieved by the same' this writ petition is filed' submits that this writ petition is I-ealncd couusel for the peLtttoners

4. squarcly cot'eletl bv the orcler passctl b-r' this Corrrt in W P No 31767 of 2015 ancl W.P.Nc'.3i122{ oI 2015' r'r'hclt:ilr tliis Coult hacl allowecl the rvrit petiLions by setting asicle the proceeclings No F/6606/2015 clated 2209 2015' relevant portion o[ thc olclers arc extracted [ret-eundcr':- Nc.31767 of 2015: scd irr s

05.03 .2020 Oder d "Botlt tlr cotutsel state tlnt thc hs it'L the zttrit pctition is squarely ,lir,',',',1 1,r1 tttre ir'rdgment of loint Collcctor' Ranga Reddy District rt' 'i,,"t,.ti,,g i,r'( tiotsS i i'tp'crttc c'ottrt Cases 695)' ' " t,, ilou, of tlte aborte subnrissions' the impugned order is set nsidc. A,:ortlittgly, llrc lL'rtl l"'iiti()tt ts 'rlloipetl to the extent indicnted alr7o?,r,. I'io oriler ns to .osts ris tt s!1111(l' tttiscellaneous applicattons pentlittg il'ntty, shnll stand ckts:ci " 0 Ord er iated 18.03.20 21 tuw P.No.33 224 of 201.5: 9 ?f "1 noi ,nd bntch, 'utt""u' Ltltttg it'tllt im.ilat isuLe,in W P Nos "Morcoi','t, tltts Cotrt, ttlttlc '1' r'li) fuint Collector had' at'ter lapse of Ij ii the A'P' 48 qenrs, crerciscd tlrc suo tttolrt ltou':ers .under.Sc.c::n Rtoltts ut Lottd ontl pattarlnr pnst Books Att' 1971 ' set aside thc Itnt ttt l rcspon'dttrt (loint ;);l;;; ';; il,"l,i'1i"'s{ 'i'''''itt'itotditts (-ollect,tr'1 cnrtrtot ittittate protttrlmgs untlel'Sectio.n 9 of the Act at'ter r,,,,'' f,,,., r,I l8 V,nrs n11'1 ''11l't1ti' tlr' >cltle things' u'ltirlt becnnu: ').'.1)!,"'',,',,i,;1,,,'-t,,',-,rr,lct l,t!r'r[ 0i.0--,)'a2-0 this Court has ttlready inrliTtilluaLs' ruhich 'i,in',,,,,i ri'r'.,v,ir).2 of ]01:t, .lilcti hy ,r,nnniut f,'rrn tlrc oery i'nuu' o"li'' tL'tiilt is impugned in the present ztrit t'ltttiott. [n tlnt oietp al' Lhe lnttter ard for tlrc reasons recorded '"i".1, ii,, ,ra''"g"d p'o""ti'gt' as agnirLst the petitioners herein' are aside tlu Ac:cortlingly, the turit ptttition is allottted im1,11"'11'1 or,l,lri to lltP cxl'''tl al tlt prlitioners lurein' t.1i'L L'llntteotrs prttltott' l'"J'i'8 i.[ nny' shnll stnnd closcd No linble to lx' set aside "716in .setting order ts to costs." -sWVy t

5. Learned counsel for tl16 psli1;.ners pray this Court to pass similar orders as passed in w'p No 31767 0f 2015 dated 05.03 -202oanrl w.p.No.33224 of 2015 dated 18.0J.2021 6 Learned Assistant Governrncnt pleacler appearing [ot_ responclents did not dispute the same

7. Recording the above submissions and in terms of ihe ordcrs passed by this Court in wpNo.31767 0f 2075clatec1 05.03.2020 and w.r).No. 33224.f 2075 tlated r8 03 2021' this writ petition is arowed by setting asiclc trre impug,ecr proceedings bearir-rg No.F/6606/2075 clatccl 22.09.2015 and thc respo,dent authoriiies are direcied not to i,terIcre witrr thc possessioll 0r Lire petitioners in respect of the subject propcrty wiLhout fo.llowing clut procedure as contemplated under law. B. Accordingly, this writ if any pencling, shall stand clo pctition is allor.t ed Miscellaneous appl hations, sed. No order as to costs. SD/-K. AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR a).. SECTION OFFICER I 1 I I To

1. The Principal secretary, RevenUe Department, Telangana secretariat, state of Telangana, Hyderabad. -

2. The District Collector Medak District at Sangareddy., - 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Siddipet, Medak District - 4. The Tahsildar, Gazwel Mandal, Medak District., < /' 5. One CC to SRI K GOVIND, Advocate. IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana al '- Hyderabad. [OUTI

7. Two CD CoPies. 8. One Spare CoPY 6' HIGH COURT DATED: zsrcfftzozs ORDER WP NO.39851 of 2015 ,:,._ _ , ,lrl\ ,..' r'. .' a' ,.) M lrl a "',, 0 5 AUE o '+ * *l * n T H o c ALLOWING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \) -'4. l I I I I i I I 1 t I t I I i I I I { I i I , l l I !