Malyala Laxminarayana v. The State of Telangana, Revenue Department

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lt/andamus to declare the action of the respondents No. 2 86 3 in changing the revenue record and entries on dharani portal in respect of Sy.No.148 admeasuring Ac.4-'14gts by recording the names of the respondents No. 4, 5 86 6 as owners for Sy.No.148/1, 14812 86 148/3 each admeasuring Ac.1-18gts of Hanumajipeta Villa,3e, Vemulawada Rural ItIandal, Rajanna Siricilla District contrary to pending surt in O.S.No. 1331 2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Siriclla filed by the respondents No. 4 to 6 and contrary to the order dated 08- 0'l -201 6 in Appeal llo D133421201 5 passed by RDO, Siricilla and violative of the privisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar pass Book AcI 2020. violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. |.A.NO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 and 3 rt:spondent to remove the entries on Dharani portal in respect of Sy-No.148 admeasuring Ac.4-14gts recording the names of the respondents No. 4 to 6 as owners for Sy.No..148/1, 14812 and '14813 each admeasuring Ac.1- 18gts of Hanumajipeta Village, Vemulawada Rural Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla District, and record pendency of suit in O.S.No_ 133 OF 2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, []iricilla, pending disposal of the writ petition. |.A.NO:2 OF 2022 Between: Ivlalyala [\,4ohan, S/o Late Narsaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ. police Constable, R/,r SC Colony. Moodapalli Village, Chahdurthi Mandal, Kaflmnagar U stnct. !9ly-ala Ramavva, Wio Late Narsaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ.Household, R/o SC Colon y, Moodapalli Village, Chandurthi Mandai Karimnagar District. Irlalyala Ravi, S/o Late Narsaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. police Constable, RJ,> SC Colony, N/oodapalli Village, Chandurthi lr.4andal, Karimnagar D strict. ....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 4 to 6 1 2 , AND 1 Malyala Laxm narayana, S/o Late Narsaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ. postal lmqloyee, Rl/r SC Cotony, IVloodapali Village, Chandurthi- Mandat, Rajanna Siricilla. 2 The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep by its principal Secretary, Secretariat, H tderabad. .....RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

3. The District Collector. Rajanna Siricialla District. 4. The Tahsildar, Vemulawada Rural Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla Distrlct. .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 3 Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order daled 071O212022 in W .P. No. 6455 of 2022, and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI T.SURYA SATISH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI L.RAVINDER, AYGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : SRI HARIKISHAN KUDIKALA The Court made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6455 of 2022 ORDER This Writ Pc:ition, undcr Article )26 of the Constrtution of Inrlia, is f-rled seck.ng the foLlos,irrg relieI "....1o Lssue a Luit, or(ler or dir"dotL ntore particuLarly otTe ot tlt? nettlre of tuit of Mend.untts to (Teclare tlrc oction of tlte respotldents iVos.2 & .l itt cltartqttttl lhe reuenue recortl qrrcl erlries orr dhararri potlr. I it7 resp<,ct of Sy No. 14I ednteosunng Ac.4. i 1 ql s by recorditg tlp ncn."s of tlrc reslnrvlettts No.s.4, .5 & 6 (l-s orrrllers for Sg.No.l48/ 1 148/ 2 &, l48/ 3 eoclt aclt\easuing Ac.1.l I gts of Itatutnajipeta Villoge, Ventrtltttoecla Rural Martdctl, Ro.lrtrtrrtt Slncrlla Dislncl (ontronl to petlclot(l sltrt rrrO.S.No. 1-]3/2016otttltc .lik' of tlrc Senror Crur/ Juclge at Sinclla filecl bll tlTe respondetls Nos.4 to 6 c1n.l ,-ontr(tt.l lo Lle ot(ler dote(l 08.01.2016 n Appeol No.D/3342/201i passed by Rl)t), Siicilla qrtd uioletiue oJ tlle lrnursiorrs of llrc TeknulutrQ Rigi rts rrr Larul attd Pettodqr /)oss Rook Act, 2020 uioktl ue of Arltcles l1 rurtl 3OOA of tlle Cottstitution of htdia....."

2. It is stated lhat the petitioncr is the owner and posse ssol' of land admeasuring Ac.4.l4 guntas in Sy.No.148 si[Llated at Hanumajipeta Vil age, Vemulavvacla Mar-rdal, Rajanna Siricilla District, having purchased the same by \\.ay of a simple salc deed on 24.09.1938, and the rcvcnue aulhorities havc issued pattadar passbool.: and title deerl bearing No.45359 1 Llnder the provisior]s of the Telzrngana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, I ,)7 1 ancl the Rnles made thereunder. It is further stated thar respondent N<>s.4 to 6, vvho arc' the brothers 2 - o[ the petitioner, tited an appeal vicle No.D/33 42l20lS bcforc the Revcnue Divisional Officcr requesting to set aside thc Proc.No.ts/85 /O9-4O, ar-rd the passbooks and title dceds issucd in favour o[ the pctitioncr, and thc same was allou,ed vide ordcr dzitcd O8.O1-2O16 cancelling rhc proc. No. B/ 85/ 09-40 and passbooks issued in favour of the petitioner; and aggrieved by thc said order, thc petitioner filed a Rcvision vide No.Dl I 1222 of 2016 bcfore lhc.Joint Collector, and pcnding adjudication of thc said revisior-r, respondcnt Nos.4 to 6 filed a suit in O.S.No. t33 of 2016 on the lile of the Senior Civil Judge at Siricilla, sceking partition over the suit schedule properry. It is further stated that lhe revision hled by the petitioncr u,as disposcd ol'directir-rg the partie s to claim the rights as per the judgment to be perssed in O.S.No.133 oI 2O16 on the filc of thc Ser-rior Civil Judge at Siricilla, which was instituted b_v respondent Nos.4 to 6 sceking partition over the suit schcdulc property. The grievancc of the petitioner is that pending adyudication o[ thc said suit and contrary to the order passed by the Joint Collector, the respondent authoritics have mutated thc namcs o[ respondcnt Nos.4 to 6 in thc revenuc records, and basing on thc said illegal entries, respondent Nos.4 to 6 arc trying to alienate the subject property. Hence, this u,rit pcrition. l

3. Considerr d the submissions ol the learncd corr nsel [or [he petitioner; Sri L. Ravindcr, [earr-rccl Assistant (iovcrnment Pleader for Revr:nue appearing for the respondent Nos. I to 3 and perused tltt' record

4. It is evidr:r'rt from the record th:rt the petitioncr purchased the subject pr operty b1, u,a.y of a simple sale r,leerl, and questioning thc said sale dee<i, respondent Nos.4 to (> have liled an appeal belore the RDO, zrnd the said appeal rr,:rs aliowed cancelling the ltattadar passbooks and title deeds issued in lavour of the pcLitioner; and clrallenging the same, th(' petitioner filed a revision and the. samc \vas clisposed of dir-ccting the parties to clairn the rights zrs per the judgmcnr passed in O.S.No.133 of 2016 on the iile o[ rhe Senior Civil Juclge ar Siricilla, which '.,r,as instituted bl,respondent Nos.4 to 6.

5. In view o1 the above, since the suit in O.S.No. 133 ol 20 16 instituted by rr:sponde nt Nos.4 to 6 claiming rigl-r t s over Lhe property is pending on thc l'ilc of thc Scnior Civil Judge at Siricilla, tl'ris Cr,urt is oI the opinion that ends of jusIice lvoulcl be met if the Sr nior Civil Judgc at Siricilla is ciirectcrl to dcr:idc O.S.No. 133 of 2016, as expedrtiousl-v as possible, rvirhout bcing influenced by thc observations made in the orclers pirssecl by the RDO and the..Lrint Collector. After cleciding thc titl(. and right 4 - of the parties ovcr the subject propcrtv, they arc at libcrty to submit an application ilt te rms of the judgmenL and dccrec passed by thc court belon' seeking amendment of the Record of Rights as pcr the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short ,,tl,rc Bhu Bharati Act,,) and the Rules made thereundcr. In any evcnt, if the said application does not fullil the requirements of thc Bhu Bharati Act, the rcspondenL_ aulhoritics shall pass a reasoned order, in accordancc with law. Tilb such time , the existing entr-ics in the revcnuc records over the subject property shall be continued. 6 With the above obscrvafions, this Writ pctition is disposed of. Thcre shtrll bc no order as to costs As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ' //rRUE CoPY/' sD/-MoHD' lsMAlL DEPUW REGISTRAR Y$' SECTIOX OFFICER Telangana at HYderabad' ',. -nu Principal Secretary, Revenue Department' Secretariat' State of z. ine District Collector' Raianna Siricialla District' 3. The Tahsildar, VemulawZJa [ural tvtandat' R9ia11a Siricilla District' 4, Two CCs to GP fOnHLViNUi High Court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad. [OUT] 6';"bCi; SRt ils u nYa sArlsH, Advocate [oPUC] ^ - 5nI dd iI SHi nnnrkLsHAN KUtilKALA, Advocate (oPUC) - Two CD CoPies 6 7 SA GJP HIGH COURT DATED:2510612025 \ gTHE S oI A o - * 16 il]l 206 z -t*\a_-.,1 * ORDER WP.No.6455 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. t6l +1e,s'