✦ High Court of India · 05 Mar 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,156 words

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

2. Miss Tanniru Sravani Durga D/o T. Koteswararao, Age- 21 years, Occ- Student, R/o Flat No.101, Sri Sai Towers, Kavadiguda, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 in FIR No.2495 ol 2023 dated 01/',1 1t2023 on the file of cyber crime Police station, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the Petitioner/Accused No. 112 in FIR No.2495 0f 2023 daled 0111112023 0n the file of Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Miss Tanniru Sravani Durga Dio T. Koteswararao, Age- 21 years, Occ- Student, Rio Flat No.101, Sri Sai Towers, Kavadiguda, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No. 2 AND 1 Ronak Tanna, S/o Jayendra, Age- 36years, Occ- Account Supplier, R/o No.'102, Prime Complex, Vasco da Gama, South Goa, Goa Flat

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. Hyderabad by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at ...PETITIONERYACCUSED No. 1 ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No. 1 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances siated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to compound the offences in FIR No.2495 of 2023 dated 0111112023 on the file of Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and Quash the proceedings in FIR No.2495 of 2023 dated 01/1 112023 on the file of Cyber Crime Potice Station, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shaik Shareef, Advocate for the Petitioner, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Angothu Nehru, for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER r HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.2057 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is flled under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioner/accused No.1 to quash the proceedings against him in F.1.R.No.2495 of 2023 of Cyber Crime police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 66C, 66D of l.T. Act and Sections 419 and 420 of lPC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of I I the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 20.02.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal 2 Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 25.02.2025 and the same is placed on record. ln view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequenfly, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in F.l.R.No.24g5 of 2023 of Cyber Crime police Station, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// ASSIST Sid/. K AMMAJI .I- REGISTRAR :\ S c'noN oFFtcER

1. The Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to Sri Shaik Shareef, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Angothu Nehru, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] (Along with a copy of Join Memo) \ To VI{ I I I I :-\ HIGH COURT DATED: 0510312025 I I I I ,^it -:\ at E sr.1 ri\.."1i ? I i',,'.. nir ? 7 rilAn 2[25 .t N <\ ;\ 4. PespArc .,/ ,/ COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AN D CRLP.No.205'7 of 2025 ALLOWING ''lrHE CRIMINAL PETITION q t F o HIGH COURT FOR THE STATtr OF TtrLANGANAAT I.A.No CRL.P.No. HYDERABAD I J"fV IN oF 2029 oF 2o2g^ EN nak TannaS/o Jayendra, : 36years, Occ: Account Supplier, /o.Flat No.102, Prime Complex, Vasco da Gama, South Goa, Goa. . .. Petitioner/Accused No. 1 1 2 AND The State of Teiangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad MissTanniru Sravani Durga, D/o T. I(oteswararao, Agel. 21 years, Occ: Student, R/o Flat No.1O1, Sri Sai Towers, Kavadiguda, Hyderabad . Respondent/ De-facto Complainant JOINT MEMO 1 it is submitted that Respondent No.2 lodged a Complaint dated 01.11.2o23before Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad, against the Petitioner herein, whereasPolice registered a case as FiR No.2495 of 2023dated 01. 1 1.2O23for the offences U/sec.66(C), 66(D) IT Act and Sec.419,. 42O IPC against the Petitioner and shown him-as Accused No' l' It is submitted that after registering the above case the 2 Respondent No.2 realized that the above complaint has been lodged due to misunderstandings and both the I \.' 14 @ parties decidecl to enter into compromise, accord ',1r. R""por.dent No.2 withdrawn the above case agal the Petitioner- a that due to intervention of elders and It is submitted well wishers the matter has been settled amicably between the parties, as such it is just and necessary to quash th,: above FIR and to record the compromrse statement- between the Petitioner and Respondent No It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and Quashthe proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused No 1 in FIR No.2495 of 2023 dated 01' ll'2o23 on the file of Cyber Crime Police Station, HYderabad, 1n the interest of justice and pass such otherord.erorordersmaydeemfitandproperinthe circumstances of the case Hence, this Joint Memo 'G . (o.^'ntl Petitioner %r*o-)Du"r41 Respondent NYo.2 HYDERABAD DATE: l0 .o2.202s I Counsel r Petitioner Coun Respondent No.2 (

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments