The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. AYESHA BEGUIVI, D/o. Gulam Ghouse, Aged about 30 vears. Occ. Househotd. R/o H No_ I_3_22siAi ameena pra'zi FHiH"1r0;:Vbiir"rsro, Checkpost Hyderabad, Telangana State. - - ...Respondent No.2/Compla ina nt Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal'peiition, the High C;;;;;yl" ql:r.:.tl:-quash the proceedings against the Fetiironers/Accused No..t ro 7 rn cc.No.7296 of 20zo on rhe fire oJ x[I RooitonaL Ctrier Metroporitan trlalistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under section 528 0f BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar'pe-tition, the iigr, c.r; ;1y1" pleased to stay arr further p_roceedings incruding of the petitionersi Accused No.'r to 7 in cc.No.7296 ;f 2o2o on"tnJ tite of Xilr Additionar chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampaily, pending oislosar of the above criminar Petition. "pp""rrn". l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 BETWEEN: Smt. AYESHA BEGUM. D/o._Gulam Ghouse, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Househotd, R/o H.No I s z2siAn Am.unr"Hri,ri FH N;.ibl:ibu-siu"tsuoa Checkpost Hyderabad, Telangana State.- '- ...petitioner/Respondent No.2 in lA.Nos .2 &3 of 202i AND

1. MOHAMMED SHAJEEUD_DJN S1o Mohammed Sirajuddin, Aged about 38 years, occ. pvt. Service, Rto H llo to_s_ aiilb"lrir.tiJr-d, A"h;;;"N:g;; Humayunnagar, Hyderabad. feiarg;na St"t.'. 2. MOHAMMED SIRAJUDD|N, S/o Muneeruddin, Aged about 6g years. Occ . i'r?,."r:rril[, 3 MATEENUNNISA, Wo,. Mohammed Sirajuddin, Aged about 60 vears. occ Home Maker, R/o. H No e-4-riotz%,-oilri <i,;itb'"si,;h iraril;i,=,ili*,,I#: Tolichowki, Gotconda, UyUerabiJ, Tei;,Gna-Si;i" Retired, Rjo H No.e_4_I36/,I6 Totichowki, Gotconda, Hyoerauao, rJiiig;;tirt". -o;i"'o;i;b''S-h,h--ru-.;d;r, "' ' 4 FARHA WAHAJUDDIN,. Wo ^Zakiuddin Mohammed, Aged about 38 vears. occ. Home Maker R/o H No.ea_1ialA/ir,-t\iili;'k;rb:Ftt tG. idi ffi;"; Cotony, Totichowki, HyderabJj, T,;t";;;;;' Si;i;]" 5. MOHAMMED ZAKTUDDIN, S/o. Mohammed Sirajuddin, Aged about 39 vears. occ. pvt. service. R/o H No e_4i aitN 1i."i;;,;l; K-r;'b. Ftrj -N;.101 iffi:; Colony, Totichowki. Hyoeraoao, rei;;s: ;;' Si';#:"' 6. RAKSHAN TAMKEEN, D/o_.Mohammed Sgajuddin, Aged about 29 vears -iir.i' U;;;; X;Lo-" riI6r?, occ. pvt Service. R/o H.No i0_s_asls, ' "'' Humayunnagar, Hyderabad. ruiinglr" Sir'ie . 7 MOHAMMED WASEEM UDDIN, S/o. Zeenath, Aged about 36 years, occ. Pvt. Service, R/o. H.No. 8-2-74013, Bholanagir, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

8. The State of Telangana, Rep. by the public prosecutor, High Court at ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 7 in lA.Nos.2 &3 ot 2025 Hyderabad .RespondenURespondent No.1 in lA.Nos.2 &3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 to compound the offences in cc.No.7296 ot 2020 on the file of Xttt Additionat chief Metropolitan lvtagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and Quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 7 in CC.No.7296 ol 2O2O on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan tvlagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Khaleel Ahmed Khan, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Vikar Oddin.K.M, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.1947 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.7296 of 2020 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 4984, 406, 453, 506 of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the \ \ petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

3. Vide order dated 11.02.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to I I submit a report. 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 13.02.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 in C.C.No.7296 of 2O2O on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. V. KAVITHA T NT REGISTRAR AS S CTION OFFICER

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, WPS DD Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4, The High court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

5. One CC to Sri Khaleel Ahmed Khan, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri Vikar Oddin.K.M, Advocate [OPUC] 7 Two CD Copies ADI(gh )r,5 Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise HIGH COURT DATED:1810212025 COMMON ORDER !.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1947 of 2025 oa 1HE S'14 ( (( z .\ O 06 t4An ?0n * s'p^l CHe ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.2 & 3 OF 2025 0r0f-'ts e\z\,r € 18 f IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE LANGANA AT: IIvDERABAD I.A.Ito CRL.P.No. .IN. oF 2025 oF 202s BE"IWEEN: 1 2 i l I t i o M Aged 49/P d o a'bo.ut t Firs T a b 8 Lan c elangana IN D Occ; Ahm tetaS t s d e o Ivf o Se;-.yice N hAIIrII o R / u H m s u d lraJ f{ 5o N 6 1 86 .years OErc , Nagar, H ..:- .:. _i:.. i-^. i. r: DIfl S Rerircd 'o R / Jama_lkun 1,e o M H No T 4 .9-; 1 d 36 n 1d I 61 2 Go Aged Quli : .) .' , ueEO.r,lglllUflsA, w/3I yohammed sirajuddin, Aged about -5o'ydarq, osc: Homp M*k;., H7;. *i,o"jrlilrAo /216, euli ff#:Jii",Tffn. {*3;;;,' ?;i';"h;;k, dic;;; -; _- "..rt 4. FAriliA wata.nioorN, w/_o Zatiud.dinMohammed, Aged -€&d{rt' SB vBars, occ: ii*;';;i;r, R/o. H.no.9_4_ , ,yi, ,ral/#/L?, ivrawin. ryab,^'ii.; ni"." ior, Aruna corony, , , T9{"rr9w.ki, Hyderabad, TJhn;;n;';;; ,:5." DDIII, S/o. rvtohamnS$ sir4uddin, li 1 / a / tz,- il-fT;d:"",}" *:T;i: Yi;"* U:i;;l, ,Tolichowki, Hyderabad, t"fr"!."a'it^t". RAKSEAN D/o. Mohammed Sira.yuddin, Aged about"29 years, 6cc: pyr. Sei-v-ice, ni.. [.n".ro_S_49lts, Fiq.5[ !qnce1, Ahmed Nagar, H;;;y,ffi"il, rryderabad, Telarfgana Sta.te - - -'rrqir qr'r45'i1 i..i-.., ) ,6 7 >rr MOIIAMMED WASEbM UDDIN, S/O. ZCCNAth, AgEd AbOUt 36 ye'ars, occ: Rt....Service,' {/;.G; . B_2_T4o/a, "n"li:ry*, Banjara Hifls, Hydlraula", r.i^.g^ra state. . . . . . Petitioners/Accused No. I to 7 @ f : .,:!he$1ate of Telan .,. I:p. uy the public-pio"L"rrto., High Court at Hyderabad .....ReSpondent/Respondent No. 1 t I 19

2. Smt. AYESHA BEGIIM, D/o. Gulam Ghoqse, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Househ6ld, R/o. H.No. 8-3- 229/A/7, Ameena Plaaa, Flat Nq. 101, Yousufguda *{vderabad' t*:5"?E*erlRespqndent No.2 JOINT MEMO

1. It is submitted that Respondent No.2 lodged a complaint dated l4-ll-2}18 'befqre WPS, DD, Hyderabad against the .Petitioners herein. Pqrsuarrt to the said complaint Police .registered a case vide FIR No. 64212OlS U /s. 49'8-A,406, 453, 506 IPC, Sec. 4 & 6 of D.P. Act against the Petitigners, where the Petitioners hergin we# *\rayed as Accused No. 1 to 7 a+d subsequenfly Police have filed Charge sfreet vrde Cc.No.zzgo of 2o2O on the irle ol- XIII AddidOnal Chiei Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. ,r t- It is submitted that after registe.ing thg above case the 2. Respondent No.2 realZed that the above,coqrplaint has bpen lodged due tq misunderstandings and both the parties decided to enter into compromise, accordingly the Respondent No.2 already withdrawn the Maintenance Case vide M.C.No.SO8 of 2022 by withdrawing all the allegations against the Petitioners. : I It is submitted that due to intervention of el{ers 3. wishers the matter has been settled amicably Qetween the p s, as- such it is just and necessar5r to quash the above Charge Sheet and to record the compromise statement between tJle Petitioner and Respondent No.2. ",[raT. art\ It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and Quash the proceedings agai4st the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 7 in CC.No. 7296 of 2O2O on the fiie of XIII Additiona.i Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the cAcumstances of the case. 4 Hence, this Joint Memo. ,.7? N o.2 Petitioner No.3 tioner |.Io.5 Petitionei: No.6 Peti No. 1 'sa4 ("t*" >" Petitioner No.4 Peti'uioner No.7 COUNS EL FOR PE-IITION.ERS @p*L Counsel for Respondent No.2 o dent No.2 IIYDERABAD DATE:1t'.O2.2O25