✦ High Court of India · 31 Oct 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 31 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
31 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,381 words

10. R.Srinivas, S/o R.Kistaiah, Aged about 45 years Occ.Real estate agent, Ryo 7 -2-581 1582, Eurgushetty bazaar, Secunderabad. 'l 1 . R.Krishna Kumar, s/o R.Kistaiah , Aged about 43 years, Occ.Real Estate agent, R/o 7 -2-58 1 I 582, burgusheety bazaar, Secunderabad.

12.P.Thirmal Reddy. s/o P.Venkat Reddy aged about 48 years Occ. Private service, Rl/o Shamirpet , R.R.Dist. l3.Venkata Raya Verma Vegesna, Occ. M.D-, Vertex Corporate,4th Fbor, Plot No.8 and 9, Jubilee Enclave, Opp. Hitex Entrance, Madhapur,Hyderbad.

14.M.Shiva Bhushan, S/o Rajaiah , Aged about 63 years, Occ.Real Estate agent, Rl/o Attapur, Hyderabad. I I I / /

15.Habeeb lslam Khan, s/o. Late Qutubuddin lslam Khan , aged about 66 years, FUo Goshamahal, Hyderabad.

16. Najmuddin lslam Khan, S/o Late Nizamuddin lslam Khan, aged about 48 years, Ri/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad.

17.lftekhar lslam Khan, s/o Late Khaleeluddin lslam Khan, Aged about s4years, Ri/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad. 1B.Ali Mohammed, Vo Mirza Qudharthullah, aged about 53 years , Occ.Land gra bbing, R/o 224-43'l I 1 Kotla Al ijah, Hyderabad.

19.Nayeem Khan, S/o Not Known , aged about 55 years, Occ.Land grabbing Rl/o 8-'1-399/50, Janaki nagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

20.M.H Farooqui, S/o Not Known , Aged about 53 years, Occ.land Grabbing Rl/ o 8-1-399/50, Janaki Mgar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

21.Nazir ahmed khan, S/o Not Known Aged about 47 years, Occ. advocate Rl/o 1 O- 2-1 I I 4,A.C.Gaurds,Saffabad, Hyderabad.

22. Ayodhya Nagar Co-operative Housing Society, Rep By its Secretary. K.Malleshwar Rao, R/o H.NO. 3-3-76/ l,Kings way Secunderabad.

23.Bangari Prakash, S/o Not Known , Occ. Corporator TRS Party, Guddimalkapur,Hyderabad.

24.Mohammed Baseer, S/o. Mohd Yousuf, Aged about 44 years, Occ.Business, R/o. 7-2-58 1 /582, Burgushefty Bazar, Secunderabad. 2s.M.Radha Krishna Murthy, s/o Not Known to the petitioner , Aged about 65 years, Occ.Business, R|/o Flat No 201,Plot No 279, Alekya Homes, Kakatiya Hills,Road No 6, Guttlbegumpet, Madhapur,Hyderabad.

26.Gayam madhav Reddy, s/o Gayam Ramchander Reddy , aged about 63 years Rl/o 1 -9-9/3, Zamistanpur,Musheerabad.

27. Govinda Rajul, S/o. Not known to the petitioner, Aged about 50 years,Occ.constable,CCS, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declare the action of the Respondent No 6 and their higher officials in proposed to invoke PD Act against the petitioner initiate proceedings under sub-section 2 of Section 3 of the AP/Telangana prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas. lmmoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act 1986 against the petitioner basing on the fabricated /false criminal cases against the petitioner in a civil matters which is sub-judice before civil courts in respect of the lands admeasuring 78-22 gls in survey No. 297-299, situated at Guddimalkapur viHage, Asif Nagar Hyderabad aM land admeasuring Ac. 3-37 guntas, situated in Sy. No. 129171, Shaikpet village, Bangara Hills, Hyderabad and other lands in which the petitioner has appeared as on counsel to his clients before the competent court of law is highly arbitrary, unconstitutional, illegal, improper and to declare the Respondent No. 1 and 2 for not registering a crime against the action of .the Respondent No. 4, 5, 6 and 27 along with unofficial respondents for their illegal acts which was explained by way of various complaints filed by the petitioner daled 11-04-2017,]7-07-2017 and 14-08-2017 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the natural justice and fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of lndia, as well as against the legal ratio laid down by the Honble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumaris Judgment and consequently may direct the Official Respondents to register the FIR against the unofficial respondents in pursuance of petitioners written complaint dt,17-07-2017 and 14-08-2017 with an immediate effect in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in proposed proceedings of the police authorities against the petitioner under Sub-Section 2 of the Section 3 of A.P./Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug-OffeMers, Goondas, immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986 basing on the False, fabricated Source of report of the Respondent No.4 and 6 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. AFSHA KHANAM, REP. FOR SRI CHERUKU ASHOKAVARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER // /t'/i / I I I THE HONOT'RABLE SRI WSTICE N.TI'KARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.3551 oF 2O1g ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue an order, direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate q'rit (i) declare the action of the Respondent No 6 and their higher oflicials in proposed to invoke PD Act against the petitioner initiate proceedings under sub-section 2 of Section 3 of the AP/Telangana prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot l,eggers, Dacoits, Drug-Olfenders, Goondas, Imrnoral Tralfic Offenders and l,and Grabbers Act 1986 against the petitioner basing on the fabricated /false criminal cases against the petitioner in a civil matters which is sub-judice before civil courts in respect of the la::ds admeasuring 78-22 gtrs in survey No. 297-299, situated at Guddimalkapur village, Asif Nagar Hyderabad and land admeasuring Ac. 3-37 gunta.s, situated in Sy. No. 129/71, Shaikpet village, Bangara Hills, Hyderabad a-nd other lands in which t]:e petitioner has appeared as on counsel to his clients before the competent court of law is highly arbitrary, unconstitutional, illegal, improper and to declare the action of the Respondent No. 1 and 2 for not registering a crime against the Respondent No. 4, 5, 6 and 27 along with unofficial respondents for their illegal acts which was explained by way of various complaints filed by tlle petitioner dated I l-O4-2O17, 17 - 07 -2017 and 14-08-2017 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the natural just-ice and fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India, as well as against ttre lega.l ratio laid down by the Honble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumaris Judgment and consequenfly may direct the Offrcial Respondents to register the FIR against the unoffrcial respondents in pursuance of petitioners written complaint dt,l7 -O7 -2017 and 14-08-2017 with an immediate effect in the interest of justice and pass..." 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Afsha Khanam, learned counsel representing Mr.Cheruku \ I I I \ 2 Ashokavardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ Petition with a liberty to avail other remedies available under law.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY' SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I

1. One CC to SRI CHERUKU ASHOKAVARDHAN, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BSR d HIGH COURT DATED: 3111012025 I I ORDER WP.No.3551 of 2018 THE S ( c? o5FIBrrt/r {: t (.', :,] i...? * D 'd t' PATC, DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS Copr'( 6 \ \, ./sr tX ^b

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments