The High Court · 2025

2. Smt.Nitya Nunna, W/o.Tejaswi Subhash Nunna aged about 36 years Occ.Home Maker Rl/o Plot No.72, Srinivasam, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ...RespondenUComplainant ... RespondenUDefacto-Complai nant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in respect of petitioner herein who is the accused No. 1 in PRC No.559 oI 2024 on the file of lll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in PRC No.559 of 2024 on the file of lll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Hyderabad. i I l.A. NO: 2 &3 OF 2025 Between : Smt.Nitya Nunna, W/o.Tejaswi Subhash Nunna aged about 36 years Occ.Home Maker R/o Plot No.72, Srinivasam, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ... RespondenUDefacto-Complainant in l.A No.2 and 3 of 2025 AND

1. Tejaswi Subhash Nunna, S/o NWN Satyanarayana aged about 40 years occ. Pvt. Employee , Rl/o Plot No.72, St.No.6, Sagar Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad (Husband)

2. State of Telangana, rep.by Sub.lnspector of Police, PS Banjara Hills, Hyderabad thru Public Prosecutor, High Court for The State of Telangana. ...RespondenUPetitioner l.A No.2 and 3 of 2025 ..RespondenURespondent l.A No.2 and 3 of 2025 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit along with permission Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offences under Sec.498A, 307, IPC and 3, 4 of D.P.Act pending on the file of the lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad in P.R.C.No.559 of 2025. l.A. NO: 3 OF 202s Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit and Joint Memo along with Compromise Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash PRC No.559 of 2024 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Kanumuri Kalyani, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Elichetty Sai Suman Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL PETITION No.1909 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Cdminal Petition is filed by the petitioneriaccused No.1 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in P.R.C.No.559 of 2024 on the file of learned lll Additional Chief Judicial lt/agistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-4 and 307 of the lndian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 .

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.1 as well as respondent No.2/de facfo complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de faclo complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly I consented for compromise. Hence parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vrde orders dated 13.'1 1.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 20.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in P.R.C.No.559 ol 2024 on the file of learned lll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioneriaccused No.1 is hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused No.1 is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services - Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- A. SREENIVASA RE ASSISTANT REGI R ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2

4. 5. o. Svs/S The lll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hydrirdbad. The Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri Kanumuri Kalyani, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Elichetty Sai Suman, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies a .l'K* (Along with a copy of Joint Compromise lVlcmo) Note : Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Kanumuri Kalyani, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 28.1 1.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and; Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.147180 of 2025, dated 17 -12-2025. HIGH COURT DATED:2811112025 I COMMON ORDER l.A NOs. 2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1909 of 2025 \ HL sIA C) ? I JAN 2t26 * PA-t * ALLOWING THE I.A NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1909 of 2025 '-1-1 - .- -l A5 ezlrlua @ v ,t ,-{d'-.)g t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA HYDERABAD CRL.P.No. 1909 OF 2025 Between: 1) TejaswiSubhash Nunna S/o NWN SaWanarayana aged about 40 years occ: Pvt. Employee R/o Plot No.72, St.No.6, Sagar Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad AND .....Petitioner 1) State of Telangana rep.by Sub.Inspector of Police, PS Banjara Hills, Hyderabad thru Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. 2) Smt.Nitya Nunna W/o Tejaswi Subhash Nunna aged about 36 years Occ:Home lvlaker R/o Plot No.72, Srinivasam, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ... Respondent/Defacto complaint IOINT MEt,lO 1 It is submitted that Respondent No.2 herein has filed PRC No. 559 of 2024 on the file of the learned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners herein who are arrayed as Accused No.1 under the offences Sections 498 A,307 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of DP Act. / /7;aut s*Lk-sk rs'uw' a

2. It is submitted that the matter is coming for trial and wi e intervention of the elders and well-wishers, the matter was settled amicably as such the Resportdent No.2 do not want to continue with the lis as the Respondent No.2 and her husband have decided to live together. 3 4 It is submitted that the matter is settled outside the court, The Respondent No.2/ Defacto Complainant is ready to withdraw the case against the petitioners herein. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and quash PRC No. 559 of 2024 on the file of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for the offences under Sections 498A, 307 IPC and 3, 4 DP Act and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hence this Memo. Place: Hyderabad Date:1q .10.2025 ./ 1*//-/ Tejaswi Subhash Nunna <bc. Smt.Nitya Nu na ;,h#ffiR PErrrroNER COUNSEL FOR RESIONDENT NO.2