V. Prakash Rao v. The Union of lndia
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as sought for' No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending' if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER One CC to SRI D.RAIIiIAKRISHNA, Advocate…
Judgment
Cause title
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:4668 OF 2025 Between: V. Prakash Rao, S/o Vithal Rao aged about 64 years, Occ R/o H.No. 1 47 I A, Picket Secunderabad. Retd. Employee AND 1 The Secunderabad Contonment Board, Rep through its Executive Officer, Secunderabad. 2 The Union of lndia, rep through its Secretary, Ministry of defence, New Delhi. P,ETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandarhus declaring the action of the '1st respondent in not considering the mutation application dated 18-4-2024 and 20-6-2024 made by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, contrary to law and against princtples of natural justice and contrary to Article '14 of Constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the 1st respondent to consider the mutation application made by the petitioner dated 18-04-2024 and 2O-06-2024 and effect mutation of the name of the petitioner in respect of H.No. 1471A, Picket, Secunderabad duly setting aside the letter daled 25-07 -2024 issued by the 'l 5t respondent and pass orders thereon in the interest of justice. -=ry lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition undr:r I ; :ction '1 51 CPC praying that in the circutns.ances stated in the affidavit filec rr Jpport of the petition, the High Court ntav :re pleased to direct the resporde r 1 r consider the mutation application made cy the petitioner dated 18-04-20114 ttn,:'A-06-2024. Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRI D.RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Resp rndent No.1: SRI K.R.KOTESWAR RAO, SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. Counsel forthe Resp rndent No.2: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAI. OF INDIA The Coud made the f rllowing: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.4668 of 2O2S
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at length, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, with a liberty to avail the remedies as available under law.
Permission is accorded.
Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as sought for' No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending' if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER One CC to SRI D.RAIIiIAKRISHNA, Advocate [O cl One CC to SRI K.R KOTESWAR RAO' SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT' IOPUCI One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' DEPUTY. SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF lNDlA, High Court tor tneSiaie o-f iei'hy'na at Hyderabad toPUCl Two CD CoPies To,
2. J. 4 BSR GJP Prtq. HIGH COUR"'T DATED: 18/A2t2025 ORDER WP.No.4668 of 2025 H1B o a silq /6 o o ) a, 22 yt,t 2J1i5 * t) F';r,. -..-;tl I ::-, .,= 27 o( :. c. / a+, / i i i I I ! I I I DISMISSING I I.IE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRI\I VN, WITHOUT CO:iTS b :.,its\"{
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.