The High Court · 2025

1. The State of.Telangana, R9p by its Public prosecutor, High Court Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana. 2 Nazia *mreen, V!/o, Sy_ed Zoha, Clo. Mohd. Haroon Shareef, Aged 37 years, Occ:.Household, R/o. Flat 201, rd Floor Rahman Tower, O-pposite Jahanara Masjid, Hamayun Nagar, Hyderabad-500028. ... De-facto Complainant /Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.19068 of 20i9 pending on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad corresponding to Crime No.624 of 2019 dated.i 1.09.20.l9 for the offences under Sections 498 (A) of IPC and 6 of D.p.Act against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 herein in the interest of justice. l.A. NO:2 o F 2025 "t*t*:); Samreen' w/o Syed zoha' clo'Mohd Haroon shareef' Aged 37 ' ton::1T'nt'n rower' opposite -ii'i)or vears occ: Housenorolvif irnr"rm ftf,tiiO Hamayun Nagar' Hyderabad-500028' "'P#it;nJ;I-i""1o cotprainant in lA'Nos'2 &3 o12025 AND

1. The State of Telangana' Rep by its Public Prosecutor' High Court Hvderabad' Hvderabad' liHisiSir""uRespondent in lA' Nos'2- &3 0!202.5 37 vears Occ Private 2 Sved Zoha, S/o rrt" SV"JliJ""rn UOOiri, .Aped Employee, wo ptot't't-ol"ro?"i'h"" rY^Iist Colony' Mailardevpallv' Caganpanaa, Rangareddy Telangana - 500 052 3 syeda Arjumand n"'6'p'i'1"'"1 wl" Late-sved Kaleemuddin' Aged 50 vears. occ: uo's"'j'iH''il;;i"i *:-iq' Phase lV' Kings colonv' Mailardevpally, c"g"'pItt'J' iangareddy' Telanoana - 500 052' 4 Syeda Akhtar Fatimj "6 ffii;;: "Dl" lJt" s^L"j Mahaboob Alam'Aged 2e years occ. Ho"tJ'lE t)il pr"i n" lol Phase lV' Kings colonv' Mailardevpally, c'g';p'it'J' iangareddy' Telanoana - 500 052 ""''- ...;;;"r;"u ln".poni"nt in.lA'Nos'2 &3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) R/w 528 of BNSS Act' 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated i;';; M;;"t'ndum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the to-A3 to compromise t"t q"t:tti"g"in""ic r'r" 19068 oi pending on the file of HiqhCourtmaybepleasedtopermitthepetitioner.andrespondents/petitioners/A1 XV Addirionar chief MetroplJ[t"r'n r,i"giitrrtu, Hyd^erabad against the petitioners/A1 to A3 for the offences ulsec. +ga (A);f IPC and sec. 6 of D.P Act' l.A. NO: 30F 2025 Petition under Section 359 of BNSS -Act' 2023 praying that in the of Criminal Petition' the circumstances stated in tnJ'i'r""'it""oum ot !311as Hioh Court may be pteased to record compromi-se in C'C'No.19068 of 2019 Magistrate, at p"-noing on rhe fite "f dated 11 09 2019 for the Hvderabad correspondrng i; il; offences under sections 4d; 1Ai ;i rpc ano 6 0f D p.Act against the petitioners/ A-1 to A-3 and allow tn""i'ti!J'to Ioilp='otit-the matier' in the interest of i# iv'io-J,tionrr ctrief .Metropolitan 624 of -201-9 justice. ThiSPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingthelvlemorandumof Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G Shiva Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No' 1 and of Sri ltlohammed Aquib' Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.No s.2 and3 ol2025 in/and CRIMI NAL PETITION No.1861 ot 2025 COMMO N ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitionersi accused Nos l to 3 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C'No 19068 of 2019 on the file of XV Additional Chief trletropolitan Magistrate' Hyderabad' registered for the offences punishable under Section 4984 of IPC and Section 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act' lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the 2. petitioners as well as the respondent No 2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly' l A Nos 2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound I I the offences.

3. Vide order daled 10 022025' this Court directed the Parties to appear before the along with their respective counsel Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identification and to submit a rePort 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 13.02.2025 and the same is placed on record. 5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 areallowed. Consequenfly, this Criminal petition is allowed and the against the petitioners/accused Nos..l to 3 in of 2019 on the file of XV Additional Chief proceedings C.C No. l9068 [\4etropolitan t\4ag istrate, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed lViscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL RAR ASS CER \ To, '1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer, WPS DD Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. The High court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

5. One CC to Sri G Shiva Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri lt/lohammed Aquib, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies ADK o Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise m t ,, .-.:- -r:J .r .*-.... .'i1 r;i Bf HIGH COURT DATED:1710212025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.1861 of 2025 \ .a -) f rHE Sfa I4. 0 3 ;r,it- 2025 <\' a 7 I "-l -i (" ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.2 & 3 OF 20Zs o\ a .,',] € H(CxH (guPT FoRTTTESTATEoFTELANGANA *T t/YDCRAB4D l.ANo: 2 . ,./ ol 2025 In crll'Na ) of2o25 Between:- 1 2 J 1 2 SYED ZOHA, S/o. Late Syed Kaleem Uddin Aged 37 years, Occ : Private EmPlofee, R/o. Plot No. 167, Phase IV, Kings Colony, Mailardevpally, Gaganpahad, Rangareddy, Telangana- 500 052. Syeda Arjumand Ara @ Parveen, Wo. Late Syed Kaleemuddin Aged 50 years, Occ : Housewife , PJo. Plot No. 167, Phase IV, Kings Cotony, Mailardevpally, Gaganpahad, Rangareddy, Telangana- 500 052. Syeda Akhtar Fatima @ Akhtar, Dlo.Late Syed Mahaboob Alam, Aged 29 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Plot No. 167, Phase IV, Kings Colony, Mailardevpally, Gaganpahad, Rangareddy, Telangana- 500 052. And The State of Telangana, . Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana. . . . Petitioners/ A- I to ,{3 NAZIASAMREEN, Wo. Syed Zoha, C/o. Mohd. Haroon Shareei Aged 37 years, Occ: Household, R/o. Ftat 2Ol,2"d Floor Rahman Tower, Opposite Jahanara Masjid, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 028. . .. De-Facto ComplainanV Respondents D 7 r\ l) l,-{/ MEMORAI.Ii TI]VI OFJOINT CO PAR MPROMISE MEMO FILEDBY THE TIES f.i i.: I It is submitted tha! rhis quash petition is fired praying this Hon,ble court to quash the c.c. No. 1906g of 2019 pending on the fire of the Hon,bre xv Addr. chief Metroporitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad corresponding to crime No. 624 0f 2019 dated' 11'09'2019 for the offences under Sections 4gg (A)oflpc and 6 0f D'P' Act against the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3. That the first petitioner and respondent No.2 were married on 0g.12.201g and it was an arranged second marriage of petitioner/Al and respondent No.2, performed as per Muslim Customs. 2' whereas the marriage, due to some mis-understanding disputes arose between the petitioner No'l/A-r and Respondent No. 2 herein and now both of them decided to resolve all and accordingly they are intending to close the above c.c. J 4 The respondent No'2 has filed a criminal compraint bearing F.I.R. No. 624 0f 2079 dated: 11'Og'2org, rhe said FIR is registerbd for the offences punishable under section' 4gg(A) of Ipc & 6 0f D.p Act, and after completing investigation charge sheet was fired against a, the petitioners/A- r to A-3 herein and numbered as c'c' No' .,*ff of zolgand cognizance was taken for the offence punishabre u/sec 498(A)'of IPC & 6 of D.p Acr., by the Hon,ble XV Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners/A_ I to A_3. That the petitioners submit that as the disputes that arose between the petitioners and the respondent No. 2 is resolved amicably, respondent No.2 doesn,t want to continuq the criminal proceedings as such the present quash petition is fired by z \ ,-) r) ') *P- l i I I I a the parties PraYing this Hon'ble court to quash the C'C' No' 190 pending on the file of Hon'ble XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' #of zors' Hyderabad. It is further submitted that as the matter rs settled no purpose will be served if the matter is kept pending before the Hon'ble Court' Petitioner No.l /A-1 Petitioner No.3 /A-3 Date: -02-2025' Place: HYderabad' bCounsel for the Petrtroners' Counsel for Respondent No'2 Petitioner No.2 /A-2 RespordntNo.z/ Defacto comPlainant