High Court · 2025

r praying that in the High Court may be the nature of Writ of ng an amount @ 1% 26.6.2OO7 in respect )stimates as per the minatory apart from a and consequently ards labour cess in i.6.2007. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.NO:27237 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the , in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r direct the respondents to include 1%o amount towards lal) Memo No. 4763/PFS. F8(A1y98-4 dt. 28.2.2OO8 by revisinl the payments made from 26.6.2007 onwards relating to th() the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. ircumstances stated t may be pleased to ur cess in terms of the estimates for all vorks undertaken by Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.NARAYANA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1, 3, 17 to 20: GP FOR FlNr,/ ,NCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR IRRIGATION & r ;OMM AREA DEV Counsel foi the Respondent No.4 to 9, 11 to 16: GP FOR Fl( 'ADS & BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No.10: GP FOR PANCHAYAT I IAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER l II I THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITIO N No.2 2328 ot 20tL ORDER: IS This writ petition filed questioning the inaction of the responden ts in adding an arnount QD 1o/o towards labour Cess relating to a_ll the payments made after 26.06.2007 in respect of the works undertaken by the petitioner, by revising the estimates as per the Government Memo dated 28.02.2OO8 and sought a direction to the respondents to include the amount @ 1% towards labour cess in respect of the payments made to the petitioner on and trom 26.06.2aO7.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government pleader for ^\lrafsport and the learned Government pleader for Roads and Buildings.

3. The learned Government pleaders would submit that in view of order dated 06.0g.2015 \ ! \ passed by the Division Bench of this o rurt in W.A.No.1012 of 2013 and batch, dated thc instant writ petition has to be dismissed.

4. Thc learned Counsel for the pctitiont:r clici not dispute the submissions made by tht: learned Government Pleaders for Transport and tL ( Roads and Buildings about the disposal of the W.r\ . tro.1012 ol 2013 and batch, which was repcrtcd in 2t l5 SCC C)nline Hvd 599

5. In vieu, of Lhe sarne, this Writ I'r" ition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

6. Misceilerneous Petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. No or< t, r as to I /-,( BHAVANI SWAMY SII |TANT REGISTBAP.-' //TRUE COPY// To, I 1 One CC to SRI B NARAYANA REDDY, Advocatelqpp,l 2 Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL Di:'', High Court for the \./ l \ SECTION OFFICER State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3 Two CCs to GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS, Hiqh () rurt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA Dt: /, High Court for the _- State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] t I

5. TwoCCstoGPFORFINANCE&PLANNING'HighCourtfortheStateof i"ringin, at HYderabad [oUT] 6 Two CD CoPies BSR Ml\ilT Ji HIGH COURT DATED:1610912025 \ l I \ ORDER WP.No.22328 of 2011 :.} {P irl ;)' (] 09 2l r,) ! n F. rcr'l DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, i WITHOUT COSTS l 59 "l