The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly o le in the nature of Mandamus decrarirrg the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peacefur rife and riberty of the petitioner and arso interfering into the matrimoniar dispute between the son of the petitioner namery Kamireddy Raghavender Reddy and Respondent No. 7 and caring the petitioner to the porice station and creating panic situation and threatening to setfle the dispute with the Respondent No. 7 without conducting the counsering and without folowing the due process of raw and without having jurisdiction is highry iregar, arbitrary, unconstitutiona r and violation of Articres i 4. 1s and 2'r of the constitution of India and arso vioration of the Principles of Naturar Justice and consequenfly to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the petitioner peacefur rife and riberty and arso not to threaten the Petitioner and his family members to set e the dispute between the Respondent No. 7 to 12 IA NO: 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No.6 not to interfere into the petitioner peacefur rife and riberty and also not to threaten the petitioner and his famiry members to setfle the dispute between the Respondent No. 7 to 12 pending disposal of Writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI RApOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 fO O: lCp f6n'ffOnle Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.7 fO 12: _ The Court made the foilowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.3792 of 2o25 ORDER: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner hled the present writ petition to declare the action of the Respondent No.6 in interfering into the peacefr.rl life and liberty of the petitioner and also interfering into the matrimonial dispute between the son of the Petitioner namely Kamireddy Raghavender Reddy and Respondent No.7 and calling the petitioner to the Police Station and threatening to settle the dispute with the Respondent No.7 without conducting the counseling/without following the due process of law as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions submits that the respondent No.6-Station House Officer has registered a case dated 28.01.2025 in Crime 2 -- No.154 of 2025 on the file of the P.S. Petbasheerabad under Section 85 of BNS, in which the petitioner is the Accused No'2 (A2) along with his son and wife. He further submits that except conducting investigation in the above case, the Investigating officer is not interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner and not interfering in matrimonial disputes as alleged by the petitioner, thus, requested to dismiss the writ petition. In view of the case registered in Crime No' 154 of 2025 on 4. the lrle of the P.S. Petbasheerabad, dated 28'O1 '2025' tlte presentwritpetitionisdisposedofdirectingtherespondent No.6-Station House officer not to interfere into the petitioner's life and libertS' and follow due procedure in accordance with law in investigation of the said crime. No order as to costs'

5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/.A. SRINIVASA' REDDY ASSISTT.NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// NCTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings' z fri. oit""t,jr-C,:nerat of Po'iice, Telangana State, Hyderabad ' 3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate' 4. Tne Deputy Commissioner of Pblice, Ivledchal Division, Cyberabad 5. ihe Assistant Commissioner of Police, Petbasheeraad Division, Cyberabad Hvderabad. State of Telanqana Commissionerate. Commissionerate. To i The Station House Officer, Petbasheerabad Police Station, Cyberabad Co m m issio n e rate. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOtt/E, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies b.

7. 8.

9. PSK. GJP 6 HlGH COURT DATED:1110212025 ORDER WP.No.3792 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @qo Ws .j' o k o3 1HE S 14 c,.,. I I 2 0 FEB 2025 I .,:..o4 l_r- !r - a l