Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 221
Judgment
THE HONOT]RABLE SRI .IIISTICE B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO CML REVISION PETITION NO: 449 OF 2023 Between: Sri. Ramati Niranjan @D. Niranjan @R. Anjaiah, S/o. Kashanna; AND "." Petition e rlPetitionerlDefendant No-7
Sri. B. Venkataiah (Died), for LRs No-5 to 7 2. Sri. B. Srinivasulu, S/o. Ramachandraiah, Aged: 48 YearS, Occ: Cooli, R/o. Peddakothapally-Vi I lage and Mandal, Nagarkarnool-District.
Sri. B. Venkateswarlu, S/o. Late Balaswamy, Aged: 42 Years, Occ: Cooli, R/o.Uyyalawada-Vi llage, Na garkarnool-Mandal & Di strict.
Sri. B. Kurumurthy, S/o. Late Balaswamy, Aged: 42 Years, Occ: Cooli, R/o. Uyyalawada-Village, N a garkarnool -Mandal & D i strict.
Smt. B. Venkateswaramma, W/o. Late Venkatatah, Aged: 55 Years, Occ: Housewife, R"/o.Uyyalawad a-Vi llage, Nagarkarnool-Mandal & Di strict.
Smt. B. Jyothi, Wo. Mallikharjuna Chary, Aged: 29 Years, Occ: House Wife, R/o.Vivekananda nagar Borabanda, H yderabad.
Sri. B. Ganesh, S/o. Late B. Venkataiah, Aged: 35 Years, Occ: Agriculture, Rio. Uyyalawada-Vi I lage, N agarkarnoo l -Mandal & D i strict. . . Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs " Petition under Article 221 of Constitution of india. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the impugned order passed on 18i1 112022 in I.A.No 312022 in O S No 21 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge at Nagarkarnool in the interest of justice and equity; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and the order of the High Courl dated 02.A3.2023,16.03.2023, 34.09 .2024 & 06 .l | .2A24 made in CRP.No .449 of 2A23 , 12 .A6 .ZAn , 19 .A6.2023 and 18.07.2023 made in LA.No.2 of 2023 and 29.08.202-1 rnade in IA.No.3 of 2A23, 26.09.2A23, 31.10.2023, t4.n.2023, 14.12.2AT, 02.01 .2024, 09.0i .2A24, 30.01 .2024, 13.A2.2024, 04.03.2024 & 06.11.2024 made in CRP.No.449 of 2023 &
01.04.7074 rnade in I.A. No.l of 7AZ4 and order dated n.A6.7024.25.06.2024. 18.07.2A24, 04.A9.2024 made in IA.No.l of 2023, 3A.09.2024, 06.1i .2024, 10.12.2024, 30.12.2024 30.01 .2425,24.02.2425, 18.03.2025, 15.04_2425, 19.46.2025, 06.08.2025, 12.09.2025, 19.09.2025 & 47.10.2A25 made herein and upon hearing the argurnents of Mls. RVR ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Bandaru Hima Varshini, counsel for respondent No.7, tl-re Court made the following: ORDER [,ist on 13.I I .2025. Interim order granted earlier, is ertended fill next date of hearing. SD/.M.NTAGAN,IA]YI ASSISTANT REGISTR,{R t, //TRTIE COPYII OFFICER To,
1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge at Nagarkurnool. 2. One CC to M/s. RVR ASSOCIATES, Advocate IOPUC] 3. One spare copy. HIGH COURT BRMR, J DATED 223.70,2025 POST ON 13.11.2025 ORDER CRP.F{O.449 0F 2{}23 EXTENSION 0l l\T'ERIi\I ORDER AL ( ? t 'iltl t$t5 -k * o€s pqT ()
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.