The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent authorities, particularly the respondents No. 3 and 4 trying to seized the petitioner rice mill and premises of the lndustry pending disposal of Petitioner's representations dated 18.O1 .2024 and 03.02.2024 as illegal arbitrary against the principles of natural justice. Consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 to grant time for deliver the CMR rice by considering the petitioner's representations dated 18.01 .2024 and O3.O2.2024 pending disposal of the writ petition. //' lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirlumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct the respondent No 3 and 4 not to take any coerci'./€) steps against the petitioner rice mill by suspending the memo No.Bl14st2o23, clated 02.02.2024 ot 3rd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between: The District Manager, Civil Supply Corporation, Mahabubabad, Mahabubabad District. AND 1 Maruthi lndustries, situated at H.No.S-2-68, Main, Ro,ad, Kesamudram of Mahabubabad District, Rep by its proprietor MekalaF.ajitha W/o. Veeranna Aged.aboul 39 Jggl., Fyo.H.No.6-57l 1 9/4, Kesamudran' Viilage and Mandat, Mahabubabad District. -=;Ei'i'B'-tX ...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT-4 department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, Bep. by its Principal Secretary Civit Supplies 3 The State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Rep by its lrlanaging Director and Vice Chaarman, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 4. The Additional District collector and Ex-officio Executivo )irector, Telangana State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Mahabubabad, t\,4ahabubabad - District. (Respondents 2 to 4 herein are not necessary parties tc this petition) ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circ:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 14l0l2oz4 passed in lA.No 1 of 2024 in w.p.No. 38',t612024. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: Gp FOR CIVIL SUppLIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4: SRI T.P.ACHARYA. SC FOR TSCSCL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITTON NO.3816 OF 2024 ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the orders of respondents 3 and 4 in refusing to grant time lor delivery of CMR rice by considering the petitioner's representations dt. l8.0 I .2024 and

03.02.2024.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing o[ the present Writ Petition are that the petitioner is a rice mill and it was supplied with CMR paddy for kharif 2022-23. However, the petitioner failed to suppty CMR rice lor kharif 2022-23 within the time allowcd and the last date lor delivery of the CMR rice for V,harif 2022-23 expired on 29.02.2024 (including the extended time). It is submitted that on 01.02.2024, when there was inspection of the rice mill, no stock of rice was found and therefore, action was sought to be taken against the petitioner and the petitioner had approached this Court by filing W.P.No. 1945 of 2024 and this Court had directed the respondents therein to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.18.01.2024 within a period ol two weeks from the 2 W.P. No 3816 of 2024 date of receipt ol a copy of the order. Therefore, thc representation of the petitioner for extension of time for supply of custorn milling rice was rejected vide memo dt.02.02.2024 and challenging the sarne, the present Writ Petition is filed

3. Vide interim order dt.14.02.2024, this Court had directed the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the 1r5.1i1[6n".r.

4. l'he 4'h lespondcnt has filed stay vacate pcrition along with counter affidavit stating that the petitioner has not (rc)mplied r.r,ith the tcnrrs and conditions of the agreement and has failed to supply the custom rnilting ricc even till date

5. Lcamed counsel for the petitioner submitted tlrt after obtaining the intcrim order, the petitioncr is not in touch with r im and he has no instructions as to the present status of the rice mill.

6. This Court observes that the petitioner har not shown any bonafides by making any payment with regard to tlrt. ;hortage of CMR rice to be supplied by the petitioner nor has he fitcd any detaits with regard to the same. Therefore, it appears that tlrr: petitioner is not interested to pursuc the Writ petition. ./ 3 W.P. No.38l6 o12024

7. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed D/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ISTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER ( One CC to SRI K.RA Two CCs to GP FOR Telang One CC Two CD CoPies ana, at Hyderabad. to SRI T.P.ACHA MA KRISHNA, Advocate [O CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Cou for the State of IOUTI nYn, Sc FoR TSCSCL [oPUc] To 1 2 3 4 PSK. LS HIGH COURT DATED:0610812025 ) ORDER WP.No.3816 of 2024 ,/, /t.:r' ia) .-) V.\ I { \ I:,,i I'lrI ..:l -,1 ,., i '.17 I1l ,ox 'li,r" DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I tp l?(