High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of ...RESPONDENTS Writ of Mandamus Ceclaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent No.4 herein in not implementing the Order vide Proceedings No,Bl1098/2018,Dt.20/06/20l8,byTransferringtheTitleinrespe.rtofAllthat the Agriculture Land in Sy No'136 an extent of Ac'1-11 gts' 137 an extent of Ac.4-24gts, 138 an extent of Ac 6-17 gts' 139 an extent ofAc4-1 ti gts' 142 an extent of Ac.4-16 gts Totally Admeasuring Ac'21 -03 gts by situated at Dandumailaram Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal' Ranga Reddy District'' as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of Natural Justice beside being in violation of ROR, Act and consequently to direct the respondent No 4 herein to RectifytheRevenueRecordsandimplementtheTransferofTitleasperthe ordersvideProceedingsNo.B/1098/201B,Dt.2oto6t2o1Bissuedbythe4th Respondent herein n respect of All that the Agriculture Land in liy No'136 an extentofAc.l-11gts,'l3TanextentofAc'4-24gts'l38anextentofAc'6-17gts' l3ganextentofAc4-15gfs,142anextentofAc.4-l6gtsTotallyAdmeasuring ;.Ac.21-O3gtssituatedatDandumailaramVillage'lbrahimpatnamlt/landal'Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI' A' VIJAY BASKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Ms' SWETCHA' AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITTON N0.4289 of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is hled seeking the following reliet .of "..-.to issue Wit, Order or direction more porticalarlu one in the lature lf Wrtt of Mandamus dectaring the aition of the Respondents more particularlg respondeit No.+ iirein in not implementing the Order uide pioceeiings Uo.e/ lOgB)2018 d.ated 2.0/06/2018 bg transferring the Title in ,espect o1 All that the Agncuhure Land in Sg.Uo.iS6 an ertent ofAc1.li gts, 137 an Ac.4.24 gts, 13g an extent of Ac.6'.17 gts, 159 an ertent extent of Ac.4.15 gts, 142 an ertent of ac.+.lO gt" foioiiy ia^easuing 4c.21.03 gts situated at Dandumailaroi Viltog", lArini^potnoi U1n(at Ranga Red_dg Dtstrtct as _iltegal, arbit/ary, ii uiolation of pinciples of Natural Justtce besid.e ieing tn ui"i,tiii"i of RoR Act a.nd consequentlg to direct the respondi'nt Uo.+ ii.i" to .Rectifu the Reuenue Record_s and i.mplement the Transfer- oj'Tifle as per the Orders uirle proceedings No.B/ I 098/ 2O1B Dt' 20/ 06/ 2018 ba tlte 4th responient herein tn ,"rp.A- o1-e that the 2suecl, Agncukure Land in Sg.No.136 an ertent of'Acl.1i 137 an Ac.4.24 gts, 13g an extent of ac.O.lf gts, liV an extent extent of Ac.4. 1 5 gts, 1 42 an ertent of Ac.4. I 6 gt, foioiig- ia^easuing 4c.21.03 gts situated. ot Danduma aroi Vi og", "laroni*potno Mandol, Ranga Reddg Distict...." -gts, _of

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the owners and possessors of rand in Sy.No. 136 to an extent of Ac 1 . 1 1 gts, Sy.No.137 to an extent of Ac.4.24 gts, Sy.No.13B to an 2 extent of Ac6.77 gts, Sy'No.139 to arr extent of Ac 4'15 gts' Sy.No.142 to arl extent of Ac.4.16 gts in total admeasuring Ac.21.03 tlts situated at Dandumarlaram Village' Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' It is further stated that :etitioner No.2, along with others filed O S'No'62 of 1976 befc,re the District Munsiff at Ibrahimpatnarn seeking for rectilicarion of Record of Rights over the suit schedule property and the said suit was decreed on 24'0'l'1976 in favourofthrlpetitionerstherein.Itisfurtherstatedt-hatwhen thesaiddecreewasnotimplemented,thepetitionershavefiled an application before the respondents seeking amendment of Records of Rights and acting on the said application' respondent No.4 issued proceedings uide No'BlllO98 l2ol8' dated 20.06.2018 for rectilication of the entries; and for implementation of the judgment and decree dated 2'11'O4'1'976' The grievar ce of the petitioners is that even after rs;suance of the said proceedings by respondent No'4, no steps are taken bytherespond.entauthoritiesforrectificationoftheentriesin the revenut: records ald as such, they are not in a position to receive an-r' incentives being salctioned by the Government under investment subsidies; and they have also submitted , application through appropriate module in Dhara,i portal to carry out the necessary corrections in the revenue records under the provisions of the Telangala Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2O2O (for short,Act, 2O2O).

4. Ms. Swetcha, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed the submission of application by the petitioners.

5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if respondent No.4 is directed to examine the case of the petitioners and if the petitioners satisfy a1l the requirements under the provisions. of the Act, 2O2O and the circular instructions issued by CCLA uide Circular No.1 of 2O2I, dated, lS.OI.2O2l ald Circular No.1 of 2024, dated 28.02.2024, consider the same for rectification of the entries in the revenue records and if the petitioners are otherwise not entitled, the respondent authorities sha11 pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance with law and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I l j i .l 4 -)

6. With th e above observations, this Writ Petition ts disposed of. No order as to costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending' if any' sha1l stand closed. SD/.A.V,S. PRASAD ISTRAR AS //TRUE COPY// FFICER To,

1. THE Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat Building, T,S.,Hyderabad. 2. fHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Ranga Reddy District. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District

4. THE TAHASILDAR, lbrahimptnam [\/andal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. One CC to SRl. A. VIJAY BASKAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BIV BS * HIGH COURT DATED:1410212025 ) ORDER WP.No.4289 of 2025 o 'ar: s 14', 6 e a- .,] 2 'i25 t a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (9,P'E %v l I I I i i l i I ' i