✦ High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 11 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
11 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,150 words

Z. Jaginisrinivas, S/o Bhikshapathy, aged about 50 years, Door No.5-7-95, Shop 8. t\/ ittapallit\/adhav, S/o Viswanadham, aged about 49 years, Plot No.25, H.No.5-5-75, Plot No.25, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

9. BandaruDhanamma, S/o Yadagiri, aged about 75 years, H.No.5-5-77, Plot No.2616, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

10. NamadeAtmaram, S/o Namadev, aged about 68 years, H.No.5-7-92, Plot No.648, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana. 'l 'l . Komati Raghu, S/o Komati Markandeya, aged about 56 years, H.No.5-7-108, Plot No.19, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda Drstrict, Telangana.

12. K- Venkateswarlu, S/o lr,4arkandeya, aged about 54 years, H.No.5-7-93, Plot No.4-6, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana. ...PETITIONERS Secretarlat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. AND 'l . The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, 2. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, at Nalgonda, Telungcma. 3. The Revenue Diriisional Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda town, Nalgonda District, 4 The Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana. Telangana. ...RESpONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of ln iia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th: High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly ore in the nature of writ of [\4andamus, a) declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the possession of the land held by the petitioners at Sy. No.3l, called as prakasham Bazar shops. situate at Nalgonda town, Nalgonda Districl, Telangana, in which the petitioners raised permanent structures and living by cloing petty businesses inspite of their representations pending since rong time, a; i egar, improper and unjust and b) consequently declare that the petitior ers are entrtled for regularization of therr possession of their small extents of land at Sy.No.32, Nalgonda town, Nargonda District, Terangana, in which t rey raised permanent structures and rlnning petty businesses. l.A. NO: 1OF 2017 (WP MP. NO: 9108 0F 2017) Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High corrrt may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners seeking regularization of their possession of their smbll extents of land at Sy.No:32, Prakasham Baziar, Nargonda town, Nargonda District, part curarry the rast made representation cated 23.1 1.2016 and to take appropriate steps in accordance with law, in the interest of justice, pendrng disposal of the at,ove writ petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Beh,veen:

1. Prakashanr Bazar shop-owners werfare Association, (Reg. No.345/201 3 of Societies Registration Act), Door No.6-2_gg7, prikasfim 6u.rr. f.frfoonO, Nalgo-nda Districr, Tetangana, rep by its Generat Sei,"tarv, inliiijin, 51.; ^ !"1" Satyanarayana, aged about bg years. 2. T.Suvarna, W/o T.Daydnand, aled about 5g years,Occ business. Shop No.5_ - -- '" " ^ Z-l0g,Plot No 1Z, prakasham darar. r.,riigon6a, N-itgonta Oistiiii 3. B.Laxmamma. W/o LateJharanappa, ag;d a6'ut'6dy""r", ,hoi'ruo .5_T_113, Plot No. l3. Prakasham Bazar, Natgonda", Nalgo;a; Oist-ici,'ieri?rg;;; '- 4 Yl: Tasne:emFathima. W/o MujatfaruOoin, Jged iOou ss vlaisi-n r.ro s_z- _ 111, Plot No.15, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda,"ttalgonOe Oistlict, ibfanginl. 5. RavirtaGovardhan. s/o.Kotaiah. aged about 56- yea-s H.No s-s-s6] shoo - ""' - '"" No.S, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, trTalgonda Oiitiici f,,f rngrn". 6. Ir4oh.ammerr Abbas. s/o rvr A.-Rasoot ag6o Jboui 56 yu, ., nlruo s-z-g+. snop No.A/5, Prakasham Bazar. Nalgonda, Iialgonda Dist;ict. Tela;qrnr. - - '"' 7. JaginiSrinivas Sro Bhikshapglh-y, aged abtrt SO year., r>oor Nt.S-i-g5. Shop - - - "- No.A/3. Prakasham Bazar Nalgbndi. Nalgonda district. Teianginr.

8. MittapalliMadhav, S/o Viswanadham, aged about 49 years, Plot No.25, H,No.5-5-75, PIot No.25, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

9. BandaruDhanamma, S/o Yadagiri, aged about 75 years, H.No.5-5-77, Plot No.26/6, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

10. NamadeAtmaram, S/o Namadev, aged about 68 years, H.No.5-7-92, PIot No.648, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana.

11.Komati Raghu, S/o Komati Markandeya, aged about 56 years, H.No.5-7-108, Plot No.19, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana. '12.K. Venkateswadu, S/o Markandeya, aged about 54 years, H.No.5-7-93, Plot No.4-6, Prakasham Bazar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangana. ...PETITIONERS IN WP

13.[t/ohammed Yousuf Khan S/o. Rasheed Khan, aged about 64 years, Occupation: Retrred Govt. Servant, Rl/o. House No.4-136, Ram Nagar, tvliryalguda, Nalgonda. '14. Smt. Vasam Tulsamma (Surrender Naxalite) W/o. Mohammed Yousuf Khan, aged about 58 years, Occupation: TRS tVuslim Women Nalgonda, Town President, H.No.12-4-136, Ramnagar, lrlirayalaguda Road, Nalgonda Town, Nalgonda District. ...PROPOSED PETITIONERS No.13 & 14 AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, at Nalgonda, Telungcma. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda-Nalgonda town, Nalgonda District, 4. The Tahsildar, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, Telangllftrrro*raNTs Telangana. tN Wp Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petitioner for impleadment and allow as a petitioner 13 and 14 in W.P.No.7399 of 2017, and pending miscellaneous petitions therein, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Proposed Petitioners: SRI B.BUSHAN Gounsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the folloryving: ORDER ,f THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SAR\TH WRIT PETITION No.7399 of 2OL'r ORDER: Learr-red Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits 1,hat the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this mattcr, thereby, the Writ Petition has become infructuous 2 Recording the aforementioned subrrission, the Writ Petil.ion is dismissed as infrqctuous' There shall be no order as to costs.

3. As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in this writ petition shall stand closed' //rRuE COPY// i,'ii'tiRiYtESii"dR sECTloN OhtcER U;E[tffi '$?:?il3.]'"s"f,qi]lr'"'u"'"''nsanaa'[ ?ffi EEJI"3EI Hvderabad. [OUl I Two CD {)oPies To 1 2 J lt: PSK TKS tr"q HIGH COURT DATED:1 110612025 ORDER WP.No.7399 of 2017 I .r::\ '-: t {: ( ,4; il0siPm ( ' :---. -----,;" DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS I . ; I i @ Pl\A\, E\+\"{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments