The High Court · 2025

4. Sri. E. RAMESH, S/o. Late E. KRISHNA MURTHY, / aged about 52 years, Occupation. Business, R/o- H. No. 12-3-221, Sai Nagar, Ananthapuramu, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh.

5. Smt. RAMOJU SUGUNA, Wo Late RAMA SWAMY, aged about 74 yea$. Occupation. House wife, R/o. H. No, 3-5-365/A, Gandhi Road, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

6. Sri. RAMOJU BRAHMAN, S/o Late RAMA SWAMY, aged about 40 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. H. No. 3-5-365/A, Gandhi Road, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

7. Sri. RAMOJU KRISHNA, S/o. Late RAMA SWAMY, aged about 37 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. H. No. 3-5-365/A, Gandhi Road, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

8. Smt. ANASURI ANASURYA, Wo Late VENKATAIAH, aged about 74 yeats, Occupation. Housewife, R/o H.No. 6-1-18'1 , Ashok Nagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State.

9. SRI.ANASURI TIRUPATHA CHARY, S/o Late VENKATAIAH, aged about 48years, Occupation. Housewife, R/o H.No 6-1-18'1 , Ashok Nagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District, Telangana State. 10 Smt D. DASTAGIRAMMA, Wo. Sii. O. xnfrnPPA, aged about 79 years, Occupation. House wife, R/o. Brahmanapalli Village' Tadipathri Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh.

11.Smt. N. HUSSAINAMMA, Wo. Sri. N. BABAIAH, aged about 73 years, Occupation. House wife, R/o. H No. l-88/A, Brahmanapalli Village, Tadipathri Mand'al, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh. Represented by their GPA HOIdETS 1.Sri. A.B. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY' S/O. LAIE T Ti A. BALI REDDY Ag"J iUort sS yejrs, Occupation Business, R/o rlo 28790' Near Rimalavam. Nandval. Kurnott'District, Andhra Pradesh :STi A SRIDHAR iiEDDV:s);. L;i;'S;i A BALI REDDY Aged about 51 1-'ars, occuqation. Business, R/o. MIG-2-64, Housing Board Colony. Nand i ll, Kurnool -ulstnct. AnOnriFirO".n viOe RegO GPA Searing Doc. No 1'13120 5. dt 0B-10-2015' .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary ([i rvenue Department) Secretariat Building, Hyderabad

2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, and Spt:r tal Secretary, CCLA, Hyderabad. 3 The Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Lanc Chanrira Vihar Building, M.J. Road, Nampally, HyderabatJ 4 The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dir;1 tct )eiling, 3rd Floor, 500 001 . ...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndi;r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the l- rgh court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly rne in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Responde r t in not considering the representation dt. 2B-0'1-2020 by the petitioners as being. arbitrary, illegal and in gross violation of Article 14 and 300(4) of The Constitutic r of lndia apart from being in gross violatron of Judgments passed by this Hon'ble ( ourt' |.A.NO:1 OF 2020 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the ci ( umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ma1 be pleased to direct the lst Respondent to consider the representation dt. 28-01-2020 by the Petitioners. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDD\ , ADVOCATE FOR Ms. B.HIMAVARSHINI Counsel for the Respondents : SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, A(: D FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER iJ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUCIOPAL IVRIT PETITION No.3828 OF 2O2O ORDER: This Writ Petition is hled seeking a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the l"t respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioners dated 28.01.2020 as iltegal arrd arbitrar5r and gross vioiation of Article 14 ald 300-Aof the Constitution of India.

2. Ms. B. Himavarshini, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for the petitioners, submits that petitioner Nos. 1, 3, 5 8 10, and 11 are senior citizens aged over 70 years. Along with the other petitioners, they are represented by their registered GPA holders, as per the document bearing No. 113/2015, dated 08.10.2015, registered with the District Registrar, Hyderabad. The petitioners made a representation dated

28.O1.2O2O to the 1st respondent, seeking to set aside Government I\/[emo No.26646/UC.II(3)/08-2, dated Page 2 of5

24.O9.2OO8, in respect of the land in Sy. Nos 10, 11, 14, 16, and 32 of Gutta,la Begumpet Village, Se I ilingampa,tly Mandal, Ralga Reddy District, and to conh-- n the orders issued in File No.F2 I 4420 I 07 , dated 26.O2. 2008, by the S.O. & C.A., ULC, Hyderabad, which rverr' in favour of the petitioners. She further submits thir. a detailed representation was made by the petitio:l :rs through their GPA holders to the lst respondent, clL rllenging the orders passed by the 3rd respondent. I Iowever, no action has been taken so far by the ls' respondent. Aggrieved by this inaction, the present writ petition has been hled.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, represen ting the learned Government Pleader for Rtr enue, upon instructions, submits that the 3rd resl ondent had addressed a letter to the 2nd resl)' )ndent vide proceedings No.F2l4420l2OO7, dated 02.05.2013, stating that since the applicalts had ql:stioned the Government Orders, the matter should be rlaced before Pase 3 of5 \ \ the Government for appropriate orders, and that it has been pending with the 1st respondent. He further submits that the petitioners made their representation only on 28.OL.2O2O, after a lapse of seven years from the date of the order passed by the 3.d respondent, and that they ought to have approached the competent authority instead of directly filing the present writ petition.

4. Haying-heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court is of the considered opinion that, as tJre grievance of the petitioners is admittedly pending with the 1"t respondent, it is appropriate, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, to direct the 1bt respondent to verify and examine the representation submitted by the petitioners, 1n h.icordance with the procedure established by law, and .'to-pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Page 4 of5

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition ts disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, rrL. scellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed ,/TRUE COPY// SD'-t\4 JAW AHAR REDDY ANT REGISTRAR ASSI i \ S TION OFFICER To t Telangana at Hyderabad ommissioner of Land Administration' and Sp -'cial Secretary'

1. The PrinciP al Secretary, (Revenue Department) Secretil i2 Building, State of 2. The chief c 3. The SPecial officer and ComPetent Authority Urban La r 1 Ceiling' 3rd Floor' CCLA, HYde rabad Chandra Vih ar Building' M.J Road, NamPallY, Hyderrt,A-SOOOOI 4. The Tahsilda r, SerilingampallY Mandal, Ranga ReddY [) strict 6 Two CCs to GPFORR EVENU E, High Court fortheStaeofTelangana at IMAVARSHINI, Advocate TOPUCI erabad. IOU CC to Ms. B.H Hvd One Two CD CoPies 6 7 SA BS gse- \ --:t i : I rl- IA .J 0 6 ttB l[E +{ tt: .:? i= -t. + HIGH GOURT DATED:2610812025 ORDER WP.No.3828 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 1o J 1.h {.j{-