✦ High Court of India · 02 May 2025

Two CD Copies v. HIGH COURT

Case Details High Court of India · 02 May 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 May 2025
Length
1,070 words

: SRI AJAY KUMAR MAOISETW Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following : JUOGMENT HON'BLE SRI WSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY M.A.C.M.A.No.L7O of 2o24 JUDGMENT: It is representcd that the matter has been r::lerred to lhc Lok Adalat and after due deliberations, the I-ok lic.alat passed art award on 08.O3.2025 as per the terms agreed rrpon by r,he parties. The r;riginal arvard dated 08.03.2025 is fil,:cL before this Court and lhc same is taken on record.

2. Accorclrngly, this appeal is disposed of in r,r:rms of the avvard dated ()8.O3.2025 by the Lok Adalat. Pencling misccllaneous applications, if any, shall stand closcd. To, //TRUE COPY// t\ SD/. MOHD ISMAIL, EEPUTY REGISTRAR. .I SECTION OFFICER 1 The Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims TribrYal-r:um-principat District Judge at Hanumakonda. One CC to Sri Ajay Kumar Madisetty, Advocate [OPUC Two CD Copies 2 3 SVS (Enclosed a copv of'auard passed b; Lok Adalat) s" HIGH COURT DATED:0210512025 I JUDGMENT MACMA.No.170 ot 2024 2 7 t'i.T ?'i25 DISPOSING OF THE MACMA WITH OUT COSTS q A BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section l9 of lhe Legol SewIces Aulhorilies Acl, '1987 (CenlrolAct)J Date:08-03-2025 Present:1. Hon'bte Sri Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the Stare of Tel.ngana) Chairman SAR

2. Sri Md.Nazeeruddin Khan, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.No. 1 7O of 2024 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST tslfsl'* '-l -{m .T t 5 * MVOP No.389 of 2022 OLD M.V.O.P. No. 255/2020 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Vehictes Accidents Tribunal -Cum -prinFipat District Judge, HanumakoMa) !';c State ot1 Between: - Md. lmam Pasha, S/o.Sameena atlas Babu Miya, Age: 28 years, Occ: Driver, R/o.H.No.3-02l1, Apparajpatti Vitlage, Guduru Mandat, Mahabubabad District, Presentty residing at Hunter Road, HanamkoMa, Warangat City and District. AND ...Appettant/ Petitioner

1. Vem Nagi Reddy, S/o. Venkata Narsimha Reddy, Aged: Major, Occ: Owner -cum-driver of the crime vehicte, R/o.Vitta 128, Praneeth Pranav APR Antitlia, Bachupalty, Hyderabad, Native of Teegataveni Vittage, Gudur MaMa[, Mahabubabad District.

2. tharati Axa General lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch manager, Branch Office at H. No.6-3-666l 8/6, Third Floor, Gokul Towers, Panjagutta, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/Respondents CounseI For Appettant/Ctaimant Sri P.Sanjeeva Reddy, Advocate. Counsel for Respondent No.2/ lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company Sri Mohammed AMu( Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legal Ctaims This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counse[ for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: EEET AWARD U h, thirty-five thousan and interest @ 7.5yo per Rs.27,35,O92/ -(Rupees Twenty-seven tal nlnety-two onty) with proportionate cos annum from the date of petition titt the d e of deposit. This is an appeat filed by the petitioner Iaimanf aggneved by the Award passed in MVOp No.389 of ZOZ2by tt Chairman, Motor Vehictes Accidents Trib unat-cum-principat District - Cge, Hanumakonda. Sri Mohammed Abdul Shabbeer , Senior Maraler - Legat Claims for the Respondent No.Z_lnsurance Company has appeared before the Lok Adatat and the Appettant/ Petitioner/Cla inrant has appeared and identified before the District Legal SeMces Authority, Hanumakonda During the pendency of this Appeat, the Pelit ioner/Appettant and the Respondent No. 2_lnsurance Compa ny have (trtered into a settlement and in pursuance of the same, the Appe[[anl ./r]etitioner has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.J4 ,17,608/- (F ulrees Thirty_four takhs seventeen thousand six hund red and eight ont)/) towards futt and ftnal settlement in addition to the amount atrr:ady deposited and the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the same. Accordin gty, compromise is recorded and the case is settt€d before the Lok Ada lat. In view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Compa ny has agreed to pay the above said amount withi n a period of one (1) month from the date of receipt of copy of this Awarcl after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. ln the eveDt of defautt or delay in making such deposit, the Claimant/Appettar t is entitted to ctaim lnterest as awarded by the Tribunat from the ca:e of defautt. 1 \ Co mpensation Awarded the Tribunat Com pensation AwardeZ (Setttement Reachedr in the Lok Adatat. S o 6 * HIGH COURT LOK AN.AI AT {,tt * rr1 srareol Apportlonment of c nsation if Additiona tDi recti on(s):

1. The Appettant/Ctaimant 2 rhe amounr il;;;"il[:TJT:",:::::."J::[ff ,] credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the petitioner/C(ai d ii this case. arry. shat[ be given me n: is permitted to withdraw the entire amount. ln token of consent for thr have signed this award ,, and 11rv6r(' the parties a1d their counsel In terms ofthe compromlse arrived at between the parties, this case sta-rds disposed of. ",,. ;r::;:i:ttlement & u IDENTIFICATION REPORT CASE NO: rtf ,Nutl{ fzo lzo"+ , 14yuo(* 3bf zon- oldfuyu ,l*- Appeltant (s) Respondent (s) 'qo'-?.na.D po.{t(,g oto ka u/, oTn,J 9rr1a,ny"1)g 1^4";yl@Ja,,r'atq 4-nq 3-az// t-le U4 4-ar^t q"a'/ or4JuL DA / ( 6 GENERAL INSURA cosT cooE E OE :1265 0 1t2(,27 *** o = 2 ) I Counsel fo Appeltant (s) CounseI for the Respondent (s) q\) lrr${uqd.,-)-SY ia,.{p"r""' -) K^t" Q^r^n pc.g1"5 sde.,fi^h)€\ SEP L) HIGH COUR LOK ADALA- T T 4 * *L,L )7 SL:i: o:1 Pv ?-4 -rU" K"od AOU&{vg"{,h^eJ CHAIR/\,tAN/SEcRETARY DLSA c knaN tr8 I I j I l OV F v

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments