DB, T. Praveena v. District Collecl

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may pleased to Writ of Mandamus. a. declare the action of ther Respondents 2 to 4, who are interfering behest the unofficial respondents in respect of unsold residential plots of the petitioners (1) plot No.1, (2) Plot No. 7, (3) Plot No. 9, (4) Plot No.28, (5) Plot No.3'l , (6) Plot No. 17, (7) Plot No. 32 and (8) consisting Plot Nos. 12, 13, 14, 15 16, 25,26 in Sy.No. 7AlA, Hajipally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and attempting to alter and change the boundaries in order to help the unofficial respondents with a malafied intention as illega!, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principle of natural justicd. b.consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 not to interfere and entertain in any kind of altering or changing the boundaries of the petitioners property unsold residential plots(1)plotNo.1,(2)PlotNo,7,(3)PlotNo.9,(4) PlotNo 28,(5)Plot No. 31, (6) Plot No. 17, (7) Plot No. 32 and (B) consisting Plot Nos. 12, 13, 14, 11, 16, 25, 26 in Sy.No. 7fuA, Hajipally Village, Farooqnagar l"4andal, Ranga Reddy District, which are the subject matter of the 0.5 No. 26 of 2O21 on the file of thP Honbie Principle Jr. Civil Judge, at Shadnagar and pass such order and orders,op merits in the interest of justice. c.And pass r I lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ip the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mzry be pleased to direqt Respondent 2 to 4 not to interfer in any manner in respect of the petitioners unsplfl residential plots (1) plot No.1, (2) Plot No. 7, (3) Plot No. 9, (.1) Plot No. 28, 1S1 nf<it No. 31, (6) Plot No. 17, (7) Plot No. 32 and (8) consisting Plot Nos. 12. 13, 14, |d, 16,25,26 in Sy.No. 7fuA, Hajipally Village, Faroognagar t\rlandal, Ranga RedOly District. lA NO: 3 OF 2021 l Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedi in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High .orn.*:r t:::":lfilii$] permit the petitioner to file the additional material documents i.e., (1) Pahaniir"4' from 2020 - 2021 , (2) 2002 (6) ALT 112 DB, T. Praveena Vs. District Collecl<ir, Hyderabad, (3) Boorla Amaranth, S/o. B. Kanthaaiah Vs. State of Telangeinu, 2021 , (1) ALT 102 in the above W.P. No 4271 ot 2021 . lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Between: 'li ::' Mudiraj Suresh Kumar (@) Donthula Suresh Kumar, S/o. Klstaiah, aged about 4&i'i" " years, Occ. Business, R:/o. Mallikarjuna Colony, Shadnagar Town and Municipalily;'1 I Fa000nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. AND ...PEflilOllEF

1. Phani Kumar Arvini, S/o. Late Sangaiah, Aged about 47 y$,flltr"- _ Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No. 13-320, Christian Colony, Shadnagar Town arird Municipality, Faroonagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana. t,: , 2. Sudeep Jadav, S/o. Vithal Rao, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 14-136, Gandhinagar Colony, Shadnagar Town and Municipt'ilifiyl FaroocinagarMandal,RangaReddyDiStrict,Telangana." lrl'

3. Gamannagari Manik Reddy, S/o. Late Venkat Reddy, Aged about52 y6!iiT,- Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No. 14103, Gandhinagar Colony, Shadnagar Town pttd Municipality, Faroocinagar [Vandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana.

4. Puram Ramakrishna Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged aOout OS yd,#i!f Occ. Business, R:/o. H.No. 15-130, Gandhinagar Colony, Shadnagar Tovrn and Municipality, Faroocinagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana;a11-.- - ...PETITIONERS 1 to 4 rgrit. in W.P.427rlffia1 , rep. by Principle Secretary, Revenue Department,

5. The State of Telangana Hyderabad, Telangana. rr,(; :i ';:], il'ti,

6. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Farooqnagar, Shadnagar, Telangana-

7. The Tahsildar, The Mandal Revenue Office, Faroodnagar Mandal, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 509216.

8. The Deputy lnspector of Survey, Shadnagr Division, 0/0. RDO, Faroocinag;ar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

9. IMaadlreddyAshok Reddy, S/o, Venkat Reddy, Aged about 43 years, 0cc. Business, Rl/o. H, No, 1 7 - 1 -3B2lK 8l 57, J. S. Reddy Sports, Balajinagar, Champapet, Hyderabad. l0.Pulipati Murali, S/o. Nagalah, Aged about 46 years, Oct. Business, Rl/o.H. 8-93, Patel Road, ShadnagarTown and Mandal, Farcocinagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana {Hl|]lt Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on 2410212021 in l.A. No 1 of 2021 in \Np no.4271 of 2021 and also dismiss this writ petition. ..,RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SUDARSHAN MALUGARI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: M/S OM LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI B. RAJASHEKAR RAJU The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.427L of 2O2l ORDER: Sri Sudarshan Malugari, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners filed a letter dated 24.01.2025 in the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2. Accordingly, permission is gralted as sought for and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, I there sha]l be no order as to costs. ?/ Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/-MOHD.ISMAIE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR t To, /ffRUE COPY//

1. One CC to Sri Sudalshan Maluqari' Advocate IOP|]Sof i iJ'i" ddii" cif"iReuen,e, Hish court for the St HvderabadlOUTl ili'-."bdto ivtli dm Law Firm, AdvocateloPucl il; dd i; 5; tRij*hekar Reddv, Advocate[oPUC] Two CD CoPies J 4 5 TJ BSK ECTION oFFlCElt f"f rngana, at HIGH COURT SK,J DATED:2710112025 ORDER WP.No.4271 of 2021 ls oE r.lAH 2025 2 * DISMISSING I'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS @t*P(