✦ High Court of India · 11 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 11 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
11 Feb 2025
Length
1,550 words

'l . Potharapu Srikanth, S/o Potharapu. ..Bixapthi, Aged 26 years' Occ' ' i.l"l,lr'pr5i"", il". oiluoi;p"riyvirrf5,-ulo cii'ein,ir Viilaoe, Ghanpur Mandal, irv"rlfi , tir*' ah r p a lp; |il fr ;i;ti iiTa-n g in' staie Decla-ration s No'l 87' - ili,j'ijroun;pitiy vii6;, tiao.cnerpu.Vittrse, Ghanp.ur Mandal, Jayashankar 2. D. Kavitha. Wo Late Sampath Rao, Aged about 32 Years' Occ' Unemployee' 3 Mothe Bixapathi, S/o.Late Ummaiah, Ag.ed abo^ut 62 Years' Occ -Agriculture' " ii?i, o-rurjillp?irv Viriiig-",-H7,;.Cr,erput'ritlage,.Ghanpyr Mandal' Javashankar ed about 75 Years' Occ - 4. Shaik Babumrya, S/o.Late Azam oa[h . Ag Xij,ilirrtrr",Hi,j cjunl,rir-pliry Vil6s" it-tb.61-,et"pui Village, Ghanpur-Mandal, fi#J#niilE"hr-pTrriirvo6t,i"j,'ierinsanastate.Dectiration_s.No.210.^ 5. Polasani Nageswar Raq, Sio Late l=axman .Rao Aoed about 58 Years' Occ' Aoricutture, wo ouudtJbiiy viii;ge-, Hid crr^etpu|. village, Ghanpur Mandal, i;y;$t;ri; i b; r"pir rirVp iit'iti, rttb ns i'i Stite DeclE ratio n s' No 1 58' o fr,taOikonOa Swaroopa, Wo.Late SamPah., Aged abput 48 Years' Occ' " ffil;it# ii"lo-i,-fuirp"iri VrrigulHiq'*retp"ur vittaie' Ghqnour lvlandal' 3;y;",,:ri;A ; b"h r"p;r iiruo iit,i"t, Tttb n g'n' st5te Decla ration s N o f 0 1' 7. Shaik Thaher Pasha, S/o.Babumiya, Aged 4bo^ut 30 Years' Occ . ' Hi; iludb;r;riry viriisiil-|lo Crrelptir11ittag",.Ghanpur-Mandal' Javashankar rji rpJprirv'oi.(ri"t, iEtrngrna Stdte DeclSration s No 210' B. Udutha Bixapathi, S/o. Late Mallaiah' Aged abo " il1" ilJuuii'i6'riv virlis"l-H"/d cil"ip'i'!tit"g"' GhanpurJvlandal' Javashankar 9. Makala Thirupathi, S/o Ramulu, Aged about- 42 Years Occ Agriculture' " ili o,lour,upJlrv virrr''gJ 'iid "cnbrpu-, yiilis", Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashankar b'i,;;r]p;ily bti,i"t, iBiing,nu Siiie oectiration s No 107' 10. Giddamari Rajaiah, S/o- Late Durgaiah'. Aged abgut 72 Years'' QQe' Aoriculture, R/o Dubb#iallv\i]ird", Iv" cnet6" Village' Ghanpur lt/andal' i;y;t"h;;ir ; b; r"pliirrlib-i3t,ili, r-"rb n g' n' stite Decli iation s No 57 b'i.r;il;;ily bditi"i, iEtrnsan" state' Declaration s No 224 ut 55 Years' Qcc. Ag(iculture' Agriculture' ., & € 1 1. Chennoiu Kcusalva, Wo. Late Raiaiah, Aged about 65 Years, Occ' Aqricufiire R/o Dubbhapally Village, Hlo.ChelIur Village Gra-npur -[vlandal, Jdyashankar t3lrupalpally District, Telangana State Declaratiotr S.No.29. 12. Mothe . Ramesn S/o.Raiaiah, Aged about 42 Years, O'3c. Agriculture, R/o Dub6hapally Village, Hlo.Cnel[ur Village, Ghanpur lVlandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally'Disirict, Telangana State. Declaration S.No.1 16.

13. cujja Rajesw'ar Rao, S/o. Late Narsaiah, AgeQ . gbout 98 Years, Qcg' Aoiiculturi:. R/o Dubbhapallv Villaqe, H/o.Chelpur Village. Glanpur Mandal, Jiyashankar t3lrtrpalpally District, Tetangana State Declatatrort Q.No.62 14. Ramanoiu Manemma, W/o. Late Kumaraswami. Aged about 65 Years, Occ. Aoriculture Rk,. Dubbhapally Village, H/o.Chelpur Village, Gnanpur Mandal, Jdyashankar tlhupalpally District, T=elangina,$tate. Declaration $,No.191 . 15. Panga Raju, Si/o.Late Poshaiah, AgeQ about 26 Years, Ccc Agriculturg, R/o bubbh'apally Village, H/o Chelpui Village, GhanpLrr Mandal, Jayishankar Bhupblpally District. Telangana State. Declaration S.No.149. l6.Veeramaneni Venkal Rao, S/o.Late Malhal Rao, Aged about 50 Years, Occ Aoriculture, R/o.Dubbhapally Villaqe, H/o.Chelpur Village, Gnanpur ManCa!, Jiyadhankar BhupalpallV Diitrict, Telangdna Statq. Declbration S No,236. 17 Veeramaneni Laxman Rao, S/o Late Malhal ftao, Aged ?i)oul 60 Years, Qqg, Agricqlture Rio.Dubbhapally Village, H/o Cllelpur Village, GnqnPurlylandal, Jiyashankar t3hupalpally Diitrict, T=elangana State Declaration S.No 239. lS.Potharapu Rajaiah, S/o Late Rajaiah, {ged abqut 65 Year:s, Ogq Agricullqre, R/o oubbhapdtly Villaqe, Hio Chelpur Village, Ghanpur lVlandal, Jayasharikar Bhupalfjally Disirict Telangana State Declardtion S No I BB {-' 19 Beri RalAmalltt S/o Late Poshetti, AgeC about ir: Years Clcc Agrtculture, R/o Dutibhapally Village, H/o.Chelpur Village, Ghanpur Mandql, Jayashankai Bhupqlpally Disirict, Telangana State Declaration S.No.17.

20. Mandh Narsamma, Wo.Late Bhadraiah, Aged about 65 Years. Qcc. Aoriculture, Rkr. Dubbhapally VIIlaqe, H/o.Chelpur Village Gnanpur Mandal, Jiyasfranka,. 13lrupalpally District, Ielangana State Declaratiorl S,No. 102. 21. Ratna Narsanrma Wo Late Raiaiah, Aged about 55 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Dubbhapally Viliaoe, H/o Chelpur Village, Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashan[<ar Bhupalpally Dis[rict, Telangana State Declaration S.No.200. Z2.Manda Durgaiah, S/o Late Kumuraiah, Aged about 60 Yearq, QCe Agriqulture, R/o.Dubbhapally Vill3ge, H/q.Chelpur VillagP, G'lanpur Maddat Jalyashankar t3hupalpally Diitrict, Ielangana State Declaratiot_r $- No.'102.' 23. Bandari Rajerrdar S/o Late ttiluthaiah, Aged about 40 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Dubbhipally Village, H/o.Chelpur Village. Ghanpur lrlandal, Jayashankar Bhupaipally District, Telangana State. Declaration S.No.10. ..,APPELLANTS AND

1. -lelangana, The State of Acquisition) Departhent Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rep by its Principal Secretary fievenue (Land The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad 3 The Commissioner, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Government of Telangana Budha Bhavan, Rani Gunj, Hyderabad. 4 E 6 7 The District Collector, Jayashanker Bhupalpally District Manjoor Nagar' Bhupalpally, Telangana - 506 169. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Bhupalpally Revenue Divisional Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, T.S TelanqanaStatePowerGenerationCorporationLtd'6--3-643'Vidyuth. sE'Jin'i'rn--ii'tlrLi'Hva"trtio, i"tansbn, - 500 082 Rep bv its chairman and Managing Director. The Chief Engineer (O and [vt)' Kakatiya Thermal Power Proiect (KTPP)' Otlriri\iirrugl. cr'{npw rrili6bal' JavAshankar Bhupalpally District' i'elangana - 506 168. ...$FqPoryDENIs IA NO: oF2 25 Petition under sectlon 151 CPQ prayi4g that in the cirQumstances.stated in tne aniOI"'tiiLo in trppltt or the petiiion, f1e Hiql Court may pe ple4se( to d-irect the 3 rd Resoondent not to approve and finalize the R and R Award of the eioceeoinss or ft'9 5th respondent in XL',',i""i.'"J,.;;;i ;.; 'n. rri".niirz[bi5r;i 01.202s, pending dispo-sal of the a6ove writ appeal '"t#" Counsel for the Appellantg: lRl' ly! JANAFPHAN RAO counse! for the Respo({g'nt Nos.!&l to 5: $Rl E' RAI4ESH CHANQBA 9oUD GP FOR LAND ACOUISITION Qqunsel for thg Rqsporldent No.2: 9Rl H' RAJESH KUtl'lAR qP FqB ENFRGY Qounsq! forihe Respondent Nos.8&7: SRI P' JAQAN MoH4l! REDEY The Coqrt made the following: JU9GTIENT l {a-'l i 3{t t: THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JT'STICE RENUKA YARA WRIT APPEAL No.178 of2O25 JUDGMENT (Per ttle Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice SuioA Paut): Sri IVI. Janardhan Rao, learned counseI for the appeliants; Sri E. Ramesh Chandra Goud, learned Government Pleader for Lan cl Acquisition, for respondent Nos.l and 3 to 5; Sri H. Rajesh Kumar, learned Government Pleader lbr Energr, for respondent No.2 and Sri D. Jagan Mohan Redclrr, learned a' counsel for res;pondent Nos.6 and 7 . 2 Learnecl Single Judge has passed the following directions: \ t "e . A perusal of the impugned procet:ding shot:; that the 5th respondent had only informeC the petit.ioners that an R&R Award would be passe<l as per Chapter-Y rlw Schedule-Il of the Act, and noth,ir-rg further has been stated therein with regard to rc:spondent authorities not considering the obje:t.ions hled by the petitioner, as contenrled. Thu,s, the petitioners cannot be said to be aggrierved by the said endorsement issued, for approat:hing this C)ourt by the present Writ Petition, without even waiting for the authorities to pass an R&R Arvard, for [trem to assail the action of the respondents- authc,rities in passing the said Award as being cont.rary to Schedule-ll of the Act. '7 . Foi: the aforesaid reasons, this Court is of the ,:onsidered view that the present Writ Petition as fi1ed is premature and has to fail. 13 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Hor,r ever, liberty is granted to the petitione.rs to asseril the R&R Award as and when passed by the ;$4' {L 2 respondents-authorities, if are same. No order as to costs." aggrieved by the

3. Learned counsel for the appellants fairly admitted that the writ petition was filed based on al apprehension that the appellants' objections would not be considered by the competent authority while taking a fina,l decision 4 We find no reason to interfere in the matter on the basis of mere apprehension. Learned Single Judge has kept it open for the appellants to file appropriate proceedings, if their objections have not been decided or if they are aggrieved by the final award. i" ', No case is .made out to interfere in the matter.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. No costs Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. I //TRUE COPY// SD/-B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER To, 2 .1 4 F b Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department Telangana The PrinciPal Secretary Secretariat, HYderabad The Principal Secretary, Energy Department' Telangana Secretariat' Hyderabad. The Commissioner, Rehabrtitation and Resettlemelt Government of iliHsY";;'d;;h, ehr;un, Rani Gunj' Hvderabad The District Collector, Jayashank-er Bhqpalpally Digtrict Menjoor Nagar' Bhupalpally, Telangana - cuQ toY' The Revenue Divisiqnal officer, phupalp4lly $evenue Divipionql Jayashankar B'hupalpally Drstrict, T S The Chairman and Manag CorDoration Ltd., 6-3-643, telingana - 500 082 ino Director, Telangana $tate Rower Generation Uid;Jfi $i.iili Ki i ratabad Ffi derabad' ,r:. -"-.*.--*&x-

7. The Chief Engineer (O and.M), Kakatiya Thermat porer projt-..;t (KTpp), ChetpurViltafe Ghdnpur n,tarioat, tiyhir,a"r,aiti,L,parparrytiisiiti, ' ,' I elangana - 506 168.

8. One Ce to SFt tlit JANARDHAN RAO Advocqte IOPUCI 9 Qne QC to Stll D JAGAT! Melaru REDDY Advocate [OpUCl 10. Two CCs to 13P FOR LAND AQeUtSIT|ON , tligtr Cui rl tor the State of Telangana: [OtjT] " IVo%?fo?l" rS,!+it 12.f wo CQ popi,-.;; KKS BS. Enersv' Hish court ror the state or rpransaqq at l .? t: E HIGH COURT DATED:1110212025 \ {.y JUDGMENT WA.No.178 of 2025 ,:i{ 11"li: s74 ?,5 I,iAn 2W .c) Dr 'SD.ICt{ 1:O t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS a ./7

4. 7/r &4

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments