E. Lakshminaravana v. The Government of A.p
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said subrnission, this writ petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to ca, for the records rerating and pertaining to the charge ,Vtemo No'28748/ser/llA2t2o12-2, dated- 'r 1-3-2013 issued by the 1st respondent and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, without any evidence, vague or in the alternative to suspend the departmentar proceedings arising out of charge Memo No. 28748lser/vA2t2o12-2, dated- i1-3-2013 issued by the 1st respondent tiil the conclusion of the criminar triar in crime No. 4s7t2o12 pending triar on the fire of Hon'ble 1"t Addl. Chief metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI K. R. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA WRIT PETITION (TRl No. 971 of 2Ol7 /
ORDER:
Operative part
On be]'ralf of Iearned counsel for the petitioner, it is represented that matter has becomc inlructuous. Recording the said subrnission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a soquel. thc rr-riscellaneous petitions, i1' any, pending shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /),l.---.'- - U\."r,o* oFFrcER
One CC to Sri K. R. Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] 2. i;o CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, at 3. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad [OUT] To, TJ BS ly HIGH COURT DATED:2710212025 ORDER WP(TR).No.971 ot 2017 /'r.' l,# lr,3 ll ,J \:s \ t $\..-oiAih t- ? I t'lAR zfiffi z * I t)t_-- S PAT DlsMrssrNc THE WRrT PETTTTON AS (TR) INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS I i I I i i I I I 6 o \1 116
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said subrnission, this writ petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.