✦ High Court of India · 06 Feb 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,042 words

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the power supply to the Petitioners property bearing plot No. 36 and 36-4 admeasuring 466.67 Sq yds each total admeasuring 933.34 Sq yds in Sy.No. 102,'10311,10312, 103/3 and '1 't1 situated at Jayabheri Enctave, phase-ll, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District as illegal, null, II 7 void, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to release the power supply without insisting for occupancy certificate. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 'l5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct Respondents 2 to 5 to release the power supply to the property bearing Plot No. 36 and 36-4 admeasuring 466.67 Sq yds each totar admeasuring 933.34 Sq yds in Sy.No. 102,1O3/1,10312,103/3 and .t11 situated at Jayabheri Enclave, Phase - ll, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VANAM SAI LOKESH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN BEDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE MRS. ]USTICE SUREPALLI NANDA' WRIT PETITION No.3496 of 2O25 ORDER: Heard Sri Vanam Sai Lokesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pteader for Energy appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos,2 to 5 and Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation appearing on behalf of respondenlNo'5' 2 The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondetns in not releasing the power supply to the Petitioner's property bearing Plot No.36 and 36-4 admeasuring 466.67 Sq' Yds each total admeasuring 933.34 Sq. yds. in Sy.No.102, 103/1, LO3/2, tO3/3 and 111 situated at Jayabheri Enclave, Phase - II, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to release I I I I J ) SN. J wP 1,196 2025 the power supply without insisting for occupancy certificate and to pass such other order...".

3. It is represented by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the subject issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated

31.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.2180 of 2025 and hence, the petitioner is entitled for the similar relief as extended to the petitioner in W.P.No.2180 of 2025 dated 31.01.2025.

4. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 5 does not dispute the said submis'sion made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the I I petitioner.

5. Bringing the said submissions of both the learned counsel on record, and for the reasons alike in the above referred order passed by this Court in W.P.No.218O of 2O25 dated 31.01.2025, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the request of the petitioner to provide electricity connection supply to the petitioner's property bearing Plot No.36 and 36-A admeasuring 466.67 Sq. Yds each total admeasuring 933.34 Sq. yds. in Sy.No.1O2, --l I 7 -) SN- J wt' 1.196 20?i tlgla, Lo3l2, LOgtS and 111 situated at Javabheri Enclave, Phase - II, Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District, upon the petitioner complying with the required terms and conditions as per rules in force, and upon the petitioner furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the Municipal Corporation concerned, within a reasonable period as prescribed by the respondent Authority' and if no such occuPancy certificate is produced bY the petitioner within such prescribed time' it is open to the to 4 to take aPProPriate - action' in However, there shalt be no order as to respondent Nos.2 accordance to law. costs. Themiscellaneousapplications,ifanypending'shallstand closed. To, /ffRUE COPY// SD ASSt ,.L. LAKSHMI BABU NT REGI STRAR ECTION O FFICER Department' secretariat' II}: "",yJHil"f, P owe r Distri b utio n co m p a nv ' l!:",:#3i'31*::?'f:?#b"::gBboi!:'""*: , :: #3is3'*?3i l?:'ft?f"?:i:T: il Powe r D i strib uti o n ' u* *1"J,s:x+:P, .Il:"?T53,[:;:'i::f; i*"#,i51l'"'t"]3if""JJl'i"*erDistributioncompanv i6"?i"{lr8i'r:i"T:3'ffi 3&"rDistribution gi:: ?"J; 3,?," 3ll3't "?B:'[ft " " '*",.ff;i'i1r"?Y5:8*::8::f; c*o sR, _:;;sil:[.j*,T;.; . :* :ff nm:t lq "#iffi Rlx,H?p5,ir,!e roo'a tio n' ro wn : :," rux rGSpDcL [opuc] 9. one cc to sRl c.MADH.,.sr,"";:::" " ;ye,m.,r"",+, .#: ffi :T ffi :J.':::R G HMc roPucl ' ' "Yr I \'uur lor the state of Telangana at loPuc] 1 1. Two cD copies BsR Yal BS \ I \ I I HIGH COURT DATED: 0610212025 ORDER WP.No.3496 of 2025 11-t {{ rE3 M \ ,) t .ai t ItA HI ED DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AT THE ADMISSION STAGE, WITHOUT COSTS C'\d,,\ $^ -,&r,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments