Ivlr v. Sitharam, S/o Late vs Dinia Naik, Aged about

as to third parties with respect to Sy. No. 83/1 extent Ac ti extent 4-29, Sy.No 89/1 extent Ac 12-30 Gts, Sy.No. 11 Sy.No. 81 extent Ac 1 1-19 Gts, Sy.No.85 extent Ac 14-06 ( 8-37 Gts situated at Yenkepalle Village, [\rlominpet Mand: without putting the legal heirs of original pattadar i.e., S-r Begum, Shri Late lt/ir Bedar All and Smt Late Thainiyathur i 10 Gts, Sy.No. B3/2 rxtent Ac 4-13 Gts, ts, Sy.No. 86 extent , Vikarabad District t Late Shamsunnia ;sa Begum including petitioner on notice as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of Arti >e 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and against principle of natural ju direct the respondents herein not to mutate names of ur herein as well as any third party with respect to Sy. No. 83,'' ;tice, inconsequence official respondents extent Ac 6. '1 0 Gts, Sy.No.83/2 extent 4-29, Sy.No 89/'l extent Ac'12-30 Gts, S;' 'I 3 Gts, Sy.No. 81 extent Ac 'l 1-19 Gts, Sy.No.85 extent Ac extent 8-37 Gts situated at Yenkepalle Village, Mominpe:' District by consldering petitioners objection dated 30/09/20:2 law, as per DHARNI PORTAL. . No. '1 1 extent Ac 4- 4-06 Gts, Sy.No. 86 Mandal, Vikarabad in accordance with |.A.NO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r;ir, urp51"n.". stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tne nigfr Cou'1 rnay be pleased to direct respondents to stop all mutation proceedings with resp rr:t to land in Sy. No. B3/1 extent Ac 6.'10 Gts, Sy.No. 83/2 extent 4-29, Sy.No 8 )/1 extenl Ac 12-30 Gts, Sy.No. 1'l extent Ac 4-13 Gts, Sy.No. 81 extent Ac .-19 Gts, Sy.No.85 extent Ac 14-06 Gts, Sy.No- 86 extent 8-37 Gts situated zr Yenkepalle Village, [\i'lominpet [\/andal, Vikarabad District pending disposal of th<; nain writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI A.NARENDER YADAV Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SMT S.SRAVANTT , AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s & 6 : M/s A.VISHALA The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No.5642 of 2O22 ORDER: 1. Heard Mr.A.Narender Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant (iovernment Pleader for Revenue appearing for the ofhcial respondents. Perused the materia,l available on record.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is liled questioning the action of the officiai respondnets in not passing orders on the objection petitions dated 26.10.2025 and 30.09.2027, filed by the petitioner requesting not to accept the applications for mutation of the revenue records in the narnes of the unofficial respondents in respect of the lands admeasuring to an extent of Ac.6.10 guntas in Survey No 83/1, Ac.4.29 guntas in Sy.No.B3/2, Ac. 12.30 guntas in Sy.No.89 ll, Ac.4.13 Guntas, an extent of 4c.4.13 guntas in Sy.No.11; an extent of Ac. 11.19 guntas in 81, an extent of Ac.14.06 in Sy.No.SS arld an extent of 8.37 guntas in Sy.No.86, situated at Yenkepalle Village, Mominpet 2 SK,J wP No.5642 of 2022 Mandal. Vikarabad District (hereinafter refe:- <:d as 'subject lands') and requested to direct the responden, eLuthorities not to mutate the names of the unofhciai responc r:nts in respect of the subject lands without considering 1 he petitioner's objection petitions.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleack: for Revenue appearing for the ofhcia-l respondents would s -rbmit that the petitioner without making proper online appl< ation, filed the instant writ petition. If pctitioner makcs a f: :rsh application through ROR portal (Bhubharathi) under th,: new Act, 2025 and the Rules mad.e thereunder, the respor-r: ent- authoritie s will consider the same and pass appropriat,: orders as per existing rules and in accordance with law an<l requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.

4. In view of the submissions made on eithr r side, without going into merits of the case, this writ petitior is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to make f:- :sh application through 'ROR portal (Bhubharathi), as per r:xisting Rules under the new Act,2025. Upon such filing Or,. Lne application I i I 5K,J WP No.5542 of 2022 by the petitioner the respondent-authorities are directed to pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of application made by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if aly, shall stand clo sed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. AHM D ABDULLA STANT AN AR ISTR ECTION OFFICER nt, evenue a Hyderabad The Principal Secretary to Government, to Govern Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, State of Telan ga The District Collector, Vikarabad District, At Burgupall 501 10'1 The Revenue Divisional Officer, tvlominpet Mandal, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad District-SO'1 101 . The Mandal Revenue Officer, Yenkepalle Village, Mominpet Mandal, Vikarabad Districl5O'1 101 . Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to SRI A.NARENDER YADAV, Advocate tOpUCl One CC to IV/s A.VISHALA, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies ikarabad Distric! To

4. o 7 o SA BSR I :'- i{ o( F. 1r, I 1UlS r\'>' \\. * \ {:c -\ 'r df * HIGH COURT DATED:1511012025 ORDER WP.No.5642 o12022 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. A P r.\,b at'