Ramanna Goud v. The Station House officer, Gokavaram Police station
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, at
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ---------------------------------- JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA ------------------------------- JUSTICE K.C.BHANU DATED: 18-09-2008 Hsd
Judgment
Counsel for t he Pet it ioner: MR.V.RAGHUNAT H Counsel for t he Respondent s: T HE ADVOCAT E GENERAL T he Court made t he following : ORDER: (per the HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner alleging that one G.V.Raghavulu, was illegally detained by the police of Gokavaram Police Station, East Godavari District and hence, he seeks interference by this Court.
Heard both the counsel.
In pursuance of the notice, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Gokavaram Police Station, East Godavari District, filed a detailed counter-affidavit, stating that the alleged detenu was arrested on 10-09-2008 in connection with Cr.No.2 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 506 r/w 34 IPC and 25 of Arms Act and he was produced before the concerned Court. In pursuance of the judicial order, he was confined in Central Prison, Rajahmundry.
3. In view of the fact that the alleged detenu was arrested and presently, he is lodged in Central Prison, Rajahmundry, by judicial order, question of illegal detention does not arise. Hence, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. ---------------------------------- JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA ------------------------------- JUSTICE K.C.BHANU DATED: 18-09-2008 Hsd
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, at
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Arms Act, 1959.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 18 Sep 2008. The bench was D S R VARMA, K C BHANU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.