✦ High Court of India · 24 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,112 words

'1 . Chakali, Pagadala Jangaiah, S/o Late Narshimha aged about 58 Years, Occ' 2. Cf;Gii @ Pagadala Narsimha, S/o Late Sathaiah aged about 52 Years, Occ' s. Cfiikiti @ Pagadala Pandu, S/o Late Sathaiah aged about 52 Years, Occ' 4. Cfuk;ii @ Pagadala Lingamaiah, Sio Late Balakrishna aged about 35Years, S. Cfri1ati @ PagaOala Mahesh, S/o Late Balakrishna aged about 24 Years, O. Cfrikati @ Pagadala Alwal, S/o Late Jangaiah aged about 48Years, Occ' 7. Cfi;k;ii @ Pagadala Mahesh, S/o Late Anjaiah aged about 48 Years, Occ' B. Cfi;6ii-@ Pagadala Narsimha, Sio Late Balaiah aged about 26 Years, Occ' 9. Cfi;i;ii @ Pagadala Murali, S/o LateRamaiah aged about 50 Years, occ' 10.C[;k;ii-@ Pagadala Dasharath, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 57 Years' 11.Ch;kali@-FigiOata Krishna, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 35 years, Occ' 12.Cfi;i;ii @ Pagadala Sriram, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 36 Years, Occ' 13.C-h;i;ii @ Pagadala Mallesh, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 49 Years, Occ' 14.Cfi;i;ii @ Pagadala Narshimha, Late Ramaiah aged about 45 Years, Occ' rs.Cfiititi @ Pagadala Parvathalu, S/o Late Jangaiah aged about 75 Years, 16.[h;kali(tFigioata venkataih, S/o lateNaraiah aged about 46 Years, occ' Occ. Agriculture. Occ. Agrjculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Aoriculture. Aoriculture. A[ are R/o Kothapalli Village, Yacharam Mandal, Rangareddy District . AND ...PETITIONERS

1. The state of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Districi Collector, Ranga Reddy District Hyderabad 3. The Tahsildar, Yacharam Mandal, R.R. District

4. Gobburi Srinivasa Rao, Sio Sri Gobburi Rama rao R/o H No 2_26g, - JillelagudaViilage. BalapurMandal, Rangareddy District 5. cobburi Muralidhar_Rao, S/o Sri Gobburi Rama rao R/o H No. 2_268, ' ^ Jillelagu{a.Vittage. Batapur Mandal, Rangareddy Distriit 6. Gobburi Sridhar Rao, s/o sri Gobburi Go'par Rao R/o Kothapaily Viilage, Yacharam Mandal Rangareddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution -of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 in granting mutation and issuing pattedar pass books cum tifle deed in favour of respondents 4 to 6 in respect of land comprising Ac 16 - 29 Gts in s.No. 373 of Kothapalli village, Yacharam Mandal, R.R. District without any notice or opportunity to the successors of protected tenants who are in possession and enjoyment of the said rand as contrary to the principles of natural justice, ilregar, arbitrary and unjust. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere or alienate the subject land of an extent of Ac 16 -29 Gts situated in S.No.373 of Kothapaili viilage, yaprar Mandar, R.R. District pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Between:

1. G.obburi Srinivasa Rao, S/o-Sri Gobburi Rama rao R/o H No.2_26g, ^ JillelagudaVillage, BalapurMandal, Ranqareddv District 2. Gobburi Muralidhar Rao, S/o Sri Gobbui'Rama rao Ryo H No. 2-268, -District _ Jillelagud,a Villag e, Ba lapur Mandal, Ranqareddv 3. Gobburi sridhar Rao, S/o Sri Gobburi Go"par RJ5 nro xotnaparty viilage, Yacharam Mandal. Rangareddy District AND ,..PETITIONERS/RR 4 TO 6 Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Occ. Agriculture. Occ. Agriculture.

1. Chakali, Pagadala Jangaiah, S/o Late Narshimha aged about SB year:s, Occ. 2. Chakali @ Pagadala Narsimha, S/o Late Sathaiah aged about 52 Years, Occ. 3. Chakali @ Pagadala Pandu, S/o Late Sathaiah aged about 52 years, Occ. 4. Chakali @ Pagadala Lingamaiah, S/o Late Balakrishna aged about 3Syears, 5. Chakali @ .Pagadala Mahesh, S/o Late BalaKrishna aged about 24 years, 6. Chakali @ Pagadala Alwal, S/o Late Jangaiah aged about 48years, Occ. 7. Chakali @ Pagadala Mahesh, S/o Late Anjaiah aged about 48 years, Occ. B. Chakali @ Pagadala Narsimha, S/o Late Balaiah aged about 26 years, Occ. 9. Chakali @ Pagadala Murali, S/o LateRamaiah aged about 50 years, Occ. l0.Chakali @.Pagadala Dasharath, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 57 years, l l.Chakali @ Pagadala Krishna, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 35 years, Occ. l2.Chakali @ Pagadala Sriram, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 36 tears, Occ. l3.Chakali @ Pagadala Mallesh, S/o Late Ramaiah aged about 49 years, Occ. l4.Chakali @ Pagadala Narshimha, Late Ramaiah aged about 45 years, Occ. l5.Chakali @ Pagadala Parvathalu, S/o Late Jangaiah aged about 75 years, 'l6.Chakali @ Pagadala Venkataih, S/o lateNaraiah aged about 46 years, Occ. Occ. Agriculture. Occ. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture. Agriculture, All are Rl/o Kothapalli Village, Yacharam Mandal, Rangareddy District ...RESPONDENTS/ WRIT PETITIONERS Secretariat, Hyderabad

17. The State of.Telangana, Represented by its Secretary Revenue Department, '18 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Hyderabad 19.The Tahsildar, Yacharam Mandal, R.R. Districi ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 0310212022 passed in W.p No 5510 of 2022, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.V.PRATAP KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l TO 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 TO 6: SRI P.SRINIVASA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER ./' To THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY ORDER: \URIT PETITION No. 5!LO of 20.22 Learned counsel for the petitioners has addressed a letter d,ated 22.04.2025 to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedies available in law.

2. Permission as sought for is accorded.

3. Accordingly, rhe present Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with rhc aforesaid liberty. No costs. As a seque I thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-K. SREE RAMA MURTHY DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI M.V PRATAP KUMAR, fdvgc-ate.lo i: il; cciio-oi ron nevEruuE, Hish court for the s. d'n"""c66 s hr F. s n r r.r rvasA REDDY, Advocate [oP uc] 4. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad. [OUT] State of Telangana, at PSK. BS ry- HIGH COURT DATED:2 410412025 ORDER WP.No.5510 of 2022 ( ) L' o tt1 E S 02 I'IAY zflfr C) * (./F sr,ATcH FO DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS A Q\,\ a d' b ._ ._-_rl

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments