Mr. Aleti Anirudh Babu, Nizamabad District & Anr. v. Mr. Aleti Raja Venkata Jaya Simha Reddy, Nizamabad District & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
...Petitioners(Plaintiffs) AND
Aleti Raja Venkata Jaya Simha Reddy, s/o Rama Linga Reddy aged 45 years Ryo. 11-1-49. Old Housing Board Colony, Kanteshwar of Nizamabad District-
Arepalli Lalitha, W/o Ganesh, aged 33 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. 1-162' Varshakonda lbrahimpatnam, Jagtial District. ...Respondents(Defendants) l.A. No. 1 oF 2026 Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 ot CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the respondent No.1 herein from alienating the petition schedule property, pending disposal of the C.R.P., in the interests of justice SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY The properties below mentioned are situated at Varshakonda village of Jagtial District with boundaries (A) Sy number. 17811211, (0-35) gts North side- Aleti raja venkata vikram reddy East side- Aleti raja venkata govardhan reddy South side- Manginipelli mahipal West side- Road (B)Sy number. 3491512 (O'34) and 34916312 (0-28) gts Comtr tct North side- ALETI.SRINIVAS REDDY East side- PODDUTURI CHITRA RANI South side- ALETI RAJAVENKATA JAYA VIKRAM REDDY West side- PODDUTURI DEVENDER REDDY (C) Sy number 35ol2l2l1 (0-34 gts) NoTth. ALETI RAJA VENKATA JAYA VIKRAM REDDY East. BAPELLI GANGANNA South. GAJJA RANADHEER West. DOMAKONDA GANESH (D)Sy number. 63410012 (1.27gts) North. ROAD East ALET| VINAYA SRI South. BAI PADMA West. ALETI RAJA VENKATA JAYA VARDHAN REDDY (E) Sy number 689/2 (1-02 gts) NoTth. ALETI RAJA VENKATA JAYA VIKRAM REDDY East. ROAD South- ALETI RAJA VENKATA JAYA VARDHAN West. UPPULETI RAJANNA (F) Sy number 360/2 (0-33 gts) North ALET| VINAYA SRI East. ALETI RAJA VENKATA JAYA VARDHAN South. KALESHWARAM NARENDER West. PALLAVENI NARSIAH Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri N Hari Prasad Counsel for the ResPondents: --- The Court made the following: ORDER - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE RENUKA YARA CTYIL REVISIO N PETITION No. 354 of 2026 O6th FEBRUARY,2026 Between: Mr. Aleti Anirudh Babu, Nizamabad District and another AND . . . Petitioners Mr. Aleti Raja Venkata Jaya Simha Reddy, Nizamabad District and another. ORDER: .. Respondents Heard Sri. N. Hari prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice to the respondents IS dispensed with Perused the record
2. This Civil Revision petitior-r is hled challenging the objections raised by the learned Senior Civil Judge at Metpally returning the praint in o.S. (sR) No. 2039 ot 2025 which is filed seeking partition and separate possession or the schedule property. The praint in o.s. (sR) No. 2039 0t 2025 upon its submission on 01.12.2025 rvas returned on 03.12.2025 with objections.
The petitioners have complied with the said objections and resubmitted thc plaint on 02.O2.2026 and on the same day, RY.J t RP-354,2026 \ - 2 fresh objection was raised about the maintainabilirr of partitron suit when the father and grandfather of the plaintilt ; werc alive 4. The merits of the case of the party can bc 1o: <ed into onl1l by a Court and may no[ be looked into by thc Il gistry at the tirne of scrutiny Such course is not permissible as per the order o[ this Court in C R'P No' 265 of 2025 dateil 16 (rl 2021 '
In the result' the Civil Revision Petition is; Ilowed setting aside the return order endorsement dated 02 02 l 026 passed in O.S. (SR) No 2039 ol 2025 and the learned Se I or Civil Judge at Metpally' is drrected to register the O'S (fl l) No 23O9 of 2025 lfotherwise in order' The Registry is direct rd to return the original plaint copy to the learned counsel atr pearing for the petitioners to enable him to present the san-it before the Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscelianeous petitions' if any' pendin i in this petition' shall shnd closed I/TRUE COPYI' lll;,til'#AXt?JIAXI: SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 *:T; :j 3il1 ill'f-ilHi':1}' oo'*"'" toPu 3. Two CD CoPtes ( I /+ ADK i *t HIGH COURT DATED: 0610212026 ORDER CRP.No.354 of 2026 .tE {;IA il() ( o , rilt 702i; * t1- 't)A1c * ALLOWING THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS 0 6 IL
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.