sri lvlupprsla Venkata Krishna v. ct:ntrary to the law laicj dou

Judgment

1. 2 3 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in"i"*it, the High court may be pieased to issue a an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularty one in tlte nature of writ of Mandamus declaring tnai the order of the second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.181eirclnol9 dated 17.06..2020 acting on ...the alleged notification dated 26.0g.2013 in Fite No E5/473 3t2o13t serilingampally/Gopanpalty, saidto have been issued by the District collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in RefusalNo.Tg of 2O1g dated f it'11 2019, acting on the alleged letter bearing No.Bt322t2oo7, dated bb.og:?ii siated to have lreen issued by the T.qhs1$ar u,ri o"prty Collector, Serilingampally [\{andal,.in respect of the Plot No.279 in Survey Nos.36/44/11,situated at ciopanpa.lly village, Serilingampally .Mancat, nang, nuooy District, refusing to re'rqister the Agreement of Slle-Cum-lrrevocable GJneral power of Attorney dated ai'07'2019, bearing Pending Document No.436 of 2019 in a selective manner and ct:ntrary to the law laicj dou,n by tiris Flonble Corrrt in W.p.No.19069 of 2a14as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminitory, contrary to law, suffers trom jurisdictional - errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and also violative of A.rticlesl4 and ,300-A of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 03.07.20'19, bearing Pending Document No.436 of 2019 executed in favour of the petitioner. l/\ NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filel in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable Cieneral Power of Attorney dated 03.07.2019, bearing Pending Document No.436 ol 2019 in rer;pect of the Plot No.279 in Survey Nos.36lAN11, situated at Gopanpally Vi lage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.ESl4733l2013l Serilingampally'Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322l2O07. dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for thc Petitioner: SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, ASST. GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION WRIT PETITIOi'I NO: 3718 OF 2O21: Between: Sri Muppala Venkata Krishna, S/o Late Muppala Netaji Bose, Age about 47 years, Or:cupation: Business Rlo. 21-167, Kavalipuram Road, Velpur, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh -534222. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 ? The State: of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Departmbnt, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022. The Distr ict Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-500072. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally. 1 -6013017 61 1 34, 1 -6U3On7 fi 34, Aryaiah Nagar, G achibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana-50008'1 . ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issut: a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.181821G112019 dated 17.06.2020 acting on the alleg,ad notification dated 26.O9.2o13in File No.E5l4733l2o13l Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal Proceedings bearing No.115 of 2019 dated 19.11.2019, acting on the alleged letter bearing \1o.B,132212007. dated 08.09.20'1 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the Plot No.281 in Survey Nos.36/AA/1 l,situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 14.09.2019, bearing Pending Document No.661 of 201 9 in a selective manner and contrary to the law laid down by this Honble Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2014as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural jt:stice and also violative of Articlesl4 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum- lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 14.09.20'19, bearing Pending Etocument No.66'l of 20 1 9 executed in favour of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 14.09.20'lg, bearing Pending Document No.66l of 2019 in respect of the Plot No.2B1 in Survey Nos.36lAAl11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E514733120131 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Collector and the letter bearing No.8132212007. dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD C;ounsel for the Respondents: Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, ASST. GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION WRIT PETITION NO:4012 OF 2021: Eietween: Sri Diddi Nagaraju, S/o. DiddiVenkataiah, Aged about 27 years, Occ: Pvt employee, R/o. H. No. 1002, Near Temple, Serilingampally, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana-500032. ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 The State of Telangana, Represented by its Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, D-Block, 4th Floor, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana-500022. The District Registrar, Moosapet, Prashanth Nagar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telang ana-50007 2. The Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, 1-601301761134, 1-601301771134. Anjaiah Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana- 500081. ,..RESPONDENTS - Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issle an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the ordei of the second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.5g2lG112020 dated 17.06.2020 confirming the order of the Third Respondent in proceedings bearing No..l05 of 2019 dated 19.1 1 2019, in respect of the prot No.20'r in survey Nos.36/AA/g, situated at c;opanpally Village, serilingampally Mandal, Ranga RLddy District, acting on the aileged File \lo.E5l4733l2o 13/serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the tetter bearing No.Bt322l20o7, dated 08.09.20.1 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector, serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manneras being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory,- contraiy to law, suffers from ju'isdictional errors and violative of the principlei of natural justice and violative of Articlesl4 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and furthei direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 09.09.2019, bearing Pending Docunrent No. P577 of 20'r9 executed in favour of the petitioner. notification dated

26.09.2013 in - lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition rrnder section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filej in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated og.bg.2O1 9 bearing Fending Docurnent No.577_ ot 2o1g in respect of the plot No.201 in survey Nos.36/44/8, r;ituated at Gopanpaily Viilage, Seriringampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without reference to the Notification dated i6.og.z0t g in rite No.ESl4733120l3lseritingampalty/Gopanpaily, of the District collector and the letter bearing t'.lo.Bl322t2oo7, dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar, serilingampally lrlandal. Counsel for thr: Petitioner: SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, ASST. GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION WRIT PETITION NO: 4047 0F 2021: Eetween: Sli Sivl Nagi Reddy_ Chafla, SJo Madhava Reddy Chaila, Aged about 50 1131_, g9-"rrylion: Business, R/o Ftat No 122, Primrose T6wer, L 6i T, Uerene (;ounty, Moulana. Urdu U-niversity, Telecom Nagar, Gachibciwli, K.V. Ranga Rr:ddy, Hyderabad-S00032 ...PETITIONER AND

1. The state of relang_ana, Represented by its special chief secretarv. k, ; t i E; i,' 5^.,y?11"_ ( [e_O r s r erangana uecretanat, Hyderabad, Telang ana-500022. " S ta.m p p )_o g p a rtm ei ni, D _ g t io n a n d ! 1a I o .

2. The District Registrar, ygo:?pqt, prashanth Naqar, IDA Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy Didtrict, Tetan gina _i6oi ot z.

3. The sub-Registrar, seritingampqlty, 1-60t30t.76t134, 1-gol3onrt134, Anj Naga r, Gach ibowri, Hyderibao, Ran ga neaoy brslritt, i.iJngr;"_tiidoa 1. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hrgh'court may be pleased to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more-particularly one in ttte nature of writ of fMandamus declaring that the order of the Second Flespondent in proceedings bearing No.909/Gil2o2o dated 1610612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.g3 of 2O1g dated 1911112019, in respect of the Plot No.122 in Survey NJs.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandat, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26togt2o13 in Fiie No.E5/473 3t2}13t S;erilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter bearing No.8132212007, dated O8tOgt2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar arrd Deputy Collector, Serilingampalty Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional e,r'rors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 18t07t2019, bearing eending Document No. P480119 executed in favour of the petitioner. !4 No: 1 oF 2qZ1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lSiOltZOlg bearing Pending Document No.P480/19 in respect of the plot No.122 in Survey Nos.36/44/6, situ.a.ted at Gopanpalry Village, seriringampailyMandar, Ranga Freddy District, without reference to the Notification dlteO ZAngtZOls in Fite Itlo.E5/473312013/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, of the District Colector and the lertter bearing 11o.8,132212007, dated OBlOgt2Oll of the Tahsildar, Serilingampally [\1andal. C;ounsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V. DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. DARA HARITHA KIRAN, ASST. GP FOR STAMPS & REGISTRATION The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUI{ANTI lIIRIT PETITION Nos.3693. 37 lA- 4Ol2 tnd 4o,47 of 2o21 COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.3693 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction mcre particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Rer;pondent in proceedings bearing No.1818I I Gl I 2Ol9 dated 17.06.2020 acting on the alleged not.ification dated 26.O9.2O13 in File No.ESl4733l 2O 13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have ber:n issued by the District Collector, confirming thr: Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal No.78 of 2019 dated 19.11.2019, acting on the alleged lett-er bearing No.B I 322 I2OOT , dated O8.O9.2O 1 I stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the Plot No.279 in Survey Nos.36 lAAlLL, sit,rated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Ma ndal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to regis,ter the: Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Po'ver of Attorney dated O3.O7.2019, bearing Perrding Document No.436 of 2019 in a selective m€.nner and contrary to the lau, laid down by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. L9069 of 2014 as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, su.:fers from jurisdictional errors and violative of thr: principles of natural justice and also violative of Arl.icles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India an,l further direct the respctndents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Curm-lrrevocable 2 JAK,J W.P.No.3693 2021 & Batch General Power of Attorney dated O3.OT.2OI}, bearing Pending Document No.436 of 20lg executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders...,, 2 w.P.No.371B of 2021 is fired seeking the foilowing relief: "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.Lglg2lGl / 2019 dated 17.06.2020 acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/a733l 2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal Proceedings bearing No.1 15 of 2OLg dated 19.11.2OL9, act_ing on the alleged letter bearing No.B /32212OO7 , dated 08.09.201 1 stated ro have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the plot No.281 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 1 l, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General power of Attorney dated t4.O9.2O19, bearing pending Document No.66l of 2O19 in a selective manner and contrary to the law laid down by this Hon,ble Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2014 as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and also viola.tive of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General power J JAK,J W.P.No.3693 2021 & Batch of Attorney dated 14.09.2019, bearing Pending Document No.66 | of 2019 executed in favour of the per-itioner and pass such other order or orders..."

3. W.t'.No.4012 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction m()re particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mzrndamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.582/G1/ 2O2O dated 17.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.105 of 2Ol9 dated 19.11.2019, in respect of the Plot Nc .201 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2013 in File No.E5/4733120131 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been isr;ued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B I 32212OO7 , dated 08.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective m;a,nner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors arLd violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the C<lnstitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed deLted 09.08.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P577 of 2Ol9 executed in favour of the pr:titioner and pass such other order or orders..."

4. W.P.No.4047 of 2021 is filed seeking the following relief: n 4 JAK.J W.P.No.3693 2021 & Batch "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.909/G1/ 2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in proceedings bearing No.93 of 2019 dated 19.11.2OL9, in respect oi th. plot No.l22 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2Ot3 in File wo.eS7+233/2013/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District coilector and the retter bearing No.Bl 322/2OOZ, dated 0g.09.201 1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selectirre manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles L4 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated t8.O'7.2OL9, bearing pending Document No.P480/ 19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass such other order or ord.ers...,,

5. Heard Mr. M.V.Durga prasad, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Dara Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for stamps and Registration appearing for respondents in all these writ petitions.

6. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the subject matter in this batch of writ petitions is identical to the subject matter in w.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch, that by common order dated o6,w.2o25, this court allowed the 5 JAK,J W.P.No.3693 2021 & Batch !t writ petitions. Hence, similar orders be passed in this batch of writ petitions.

7. For reasons alike, as stated in the common order, dated 06.10.2025, in W.P.No.4475 of 2O2l & batch and in terms thereof, the Writ Petitions are allowed "qud' the writ petitioners, "qttd'the prayers. No order as to costs. Mir;cellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/-M. JAWAHAR REDDY STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Ihe special chief secret-ary,. Revenue_(Registration and Stamps) Department, The State of r-elangana D-Bldck, 4th Flooi, reririgZn, ^ Sgcrglariat, Hyderabad, Telangina -SOO022 2. The Dist'ict Registrar, ft/oosap6t, prashanth Naoar, IDA Kukatoallv ^ H.yde1apryt, Ranga leddy District, Telangana _SbOOli.' '--"-'r-"' ' 3 rhe sub"RussJlq,f, . Nrgrl,S;ac!ibggri,.Hydelaba<i, Ranga Reddy Distribt, reijnqana-loooat. 4. One CC to SRI M.V. DURGA ?BASAp, Advcicate tOiiuCt 5. Two ccs; to Gp FoR REVENUE, High court for thb State'of relangana. 6. Two CD Copies fle{lno,ampq.lv, 1-6ghot76!134, 1-60t30t77t134, Anjaiah (r'tlong with a copy of common oider dated 06.10.2025 in wp No.4475 of 2021& batch) BN BS Pan4.- HIGH COI.JRT DATED:0'711012025 ) COMMON ORDER WP.No.3693, 3718, 4012 & 4,047 of 2Ct21 .l b o L) 2 1 rE8 2026 ( (i ALLOWING ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS @r^c. ro\:-\>4' THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUI{ANTI WRIT PETITION Nos.447 5- 4480. 4494. 4502. 4542. 5,072. 3681. 3998. 5080. 5091. 511 8 5145, 5399. 5415. 542().5429. 5435. 5436. s926, 6234, 6238, 5441, 5446, 671L, 6772, 6779, 6781 8331 and 88OO of 2O2l COMMON ORDER: W.P.No.4475 of 2O2I is filed with the following prayer: '... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.576/G1/2O2O dated 16/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.BS of 2019 dated L9lLl/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.65 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109/2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2o13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lO/O7/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P455/19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4480 of 2O2l is filed with the following 2 prayer: 2 w.P.No.aa7i of 2021"'ff;i "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18193/ Gl /2OLg dated 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.99 of 2o19 dated l9/ll/2ol9, in respect of the plot No.303 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2Ot3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2OI3 / Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter rearing No.B/32212OOT, dated O8lOg/2Ott stated to .eave been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector, iierilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers Iiom jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of ,atural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of fiale-cum-Irrevocable General power of Attorney dated 2,5/OT I2O19, bearing pending Document No.p5O4/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass...', w-P.No.4494 of 2o2r is filed with the following 3 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction rrore particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus d:claring that the order of the second Respondent in p:oceedings bearing No.5g6/G L /2O2O dated Ir5/06/2O2O confirming thg Order of the Third R:spondent in Proceedings bearing No.199 of 2OL9 dated 2L/1L/2O19, in respect of the plot No.42 in Survey N,rs.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, st:rilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated. 26/09/2or3 in r.ite No.E5/4733 /2o13lSerilin garrrpe/lly /Gopanpally, said to hu.ve been issued by the District coflector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OOT, dated OSlOg/2OtL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r colrector, 3 w.P.No.447 5 of 2021"'*f;il Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 16lOg l2ol9,bearing Pending Document No. P667/2olg executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4502 of 2O2l is filed with the following 4 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order oi the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1837/G I /2019 dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal Proceedings bearing No.104 of 2Ol9 dated L9 /LL /2019, in respect of the Plot No.181 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109 /2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2O1 3/ Serilin gampally I Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8lO9/20ll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated O9/O8/2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P576 of 2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.4542 of 2O2l is filed with the following 5 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 4 . JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18186/Gl /2019 dated 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.97 of 2019 dated L9/LL/2O19, in respect of the Plot No.186 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on tlre alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File N o. E5 / a7 X / 20 I 3 / Serilin gampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter b:aring No.B/32212007, dated O8/O9/2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, is a selective manner as being iI egal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of nltural jtrstice mod violative'of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the re:spondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2.;lO7 /2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P500 of 2t)L9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.5O72 of 2O2l is filed with the following 6 prayer ". .to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus dt:claring that the order of tJ:e Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18185 lGl /2O2O dated 1'; /06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Rt:spondent in Proceedings bearing No.100 of 2Ol9 dated Lg/lll2olg in respect of the Plot No.161 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 2610912013 in File No. E:; / 4733 /20 13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to heLve been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9l2OLt stated to he,ve been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5l Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being ilft:gal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers frc,m jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of 5 JAK;J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 IOT 12019, bearing Pending Document No.P526/ 19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.3681 of 2O2l is filed with the following 7 prayer: File "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18183/G I /2OL9 dated 1710612020 acting on the alleged notification dated 26.O9.2OL3 in No.E5/473s/2OL3 Serilingampatly/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Refusal No.76 of 2019 dated 19 / LI l2ol9, acting on the alleged letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OBlO9l2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in respect of the Plot No.287 in Survey Nos.36/AAl8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, refusing to register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 03/O7 /2019, bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2019 in a selective manner and contrary to the law laid down by this Honourable Court in W.P:No.19O69 of 2014 as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated 03lO7l2O19 bearing Pending Document No.433 of 2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.3998 of 2O2l is filed with the following 8 prayer 6 w.P.No.4475 0f 2o2r"ffJi "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18I89lGL /2019 dated 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.82 of 2019 dated I9/IL/2O19 in respect of the Plot No.73 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09l2Ol3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2ol3/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O9/O9l2OlL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discrimind.tory, contrary to law suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-Cum-lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated O4IOT /2019, bearing Pending Document No.P442 of 2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." IM.P.No.SO8O of 2021 is filed with the following 9 prayer': "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Responderrt in proceedings bearing No.581/GIl2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.102 of 2Ol9 dated l9/ll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.128 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2013 in File No. E5/47 33 I 20 1 3/ Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2OLL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r Collector, 7 W.P.No.4475 of 202 1.'*[ i Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and viorative of the principles of natural justice and viorative of Articles 14 and 3oo-A of the constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated 07 /08l2OLg, bearing pending Document No.p565/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass...,, w-P.No.5091 of 2o2L is filed with the following 10 prayer "...to issue a an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.ST2/Gl l2O2O dated L6/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.7s of 2or9 dated 19.11.2OI9, in respect of the plot No.133 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2oL3 in File No.E5 / 4733 / 20L3 /serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OOT, dated Og.09.20i1 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy coflector, serilingampally Mandal, in a serective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, cohtrary to law,,suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principres of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 27 /O6/2OL9, bearing pending Document No.p4 16/ Lg executed in favour of the petitioners and pass...,, w. P- No. 5 1 18 of 2o2r is filed with the foflowing

11. prayer: '...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 8 \ I w.P.No.4475 of 2021"'ff;l declaring that the order the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9O5/GL /2O2O dated 16l06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.84 of 2OL9 dated l9/Lll2ol9, in respect of the Plot No.140 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6,situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2OI3 in File No.E5/a7$ I 2Ol3 I Serilingampalty/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9l2OIl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5l to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 06/07 /2019, bearing Pending Document No.P446/ 79 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

12. !r/.P.No.5145 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.571/G I /2O2O dated 16l06l2O2O confirming the Order of the- Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.74 of 2Ol9 dated l9l1tl2}I9, in respect of the Plot No.131 in Survey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26l09l2Ol3 in File No.E5/4733 / 2o13/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OSlOgl2OlL stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being lllegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contraqr to law, suffers irom jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of 9 JAK,J. W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated 27 /06/2019, bearing pending Document No.p415/19 executed in favour of the petitioners and pass...,,

13. w.P.No.5399 of 2o2t is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18201/ Gt l2olg 17.06.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.13o of 2ot9 dated 2L.lL.2Ol9, in respect of the plot No.l11 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2OIS in File No. E5/47 33 / 20 13 / Serilingam pally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OOZ, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy collector, Seriiingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and. further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe, Deed dated 25.10.2O19, bearing pending Document No.pZS6 /2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

14. W.P.No.5415 of 2O2t is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18190lcll2}l9 dated 77.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third t0 1 W.P.No.4475 of 202r.'fi Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.110 of 2019 dated 19.11.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.28 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2OL3 in File No. E5/ 47 33 I 20 1 3 / Serilin gampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 11.09.2019, bearing Pending Document No.P646/2O19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.542O of 2O2l is filed with the following 15 pra\rer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.580/GL /2020 dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No. 10 L of 20 l9 dated i9. 1 1 .2019, in respect of the Plot No.305 in Survey Nos.36/AA/8, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mqndal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification File No.E5/4733 / 2013 /serilingampally I Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2007, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective m€rnner as being illegal, arbitrar5r, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated

26.09.2013 1l JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

27.O7.2019, bearing pending Document No.pS2Z /2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass...,, L6. w.P.No.5429 of 2021 is filed with the following prayer: ".-.to issue a an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.1g35/G I /2020 dated 1,6/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in proceedings bearing r32 of 2olg dated 2llll/2o19, in respect of the plot No.110 in Surwey Nos.36/AA/6, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/og/2or3 in File No.E5/4733 / 20 I 3/ Serilin gampaJly /Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OSlOg/2OLt stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deput5r collector, serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrar5r to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3oo-A of the constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the sale Deed dated 28/1012019, bearing pending Document No. p763/2OLg executed in favour of the petitioner and pass...,, { 1,7 - w.P.No.5435 of 2o2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue as an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18200/ Gt /2}lg 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.117 of 2Ol9 dated L9/IL/2O19, in respect of the plot No.257 in Survey 36lAAl 17, situated at Gopanpally Village, 12 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch I, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/0912013 in FiIe No.E5/4733 / 2013 lserilingampatly/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OBIO|/2}ll stated to been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy. Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated L6/0912019, bearing Pending Document No. P665/2O19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

18. tM.P.No.5436 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer': "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18 199 IGL / 2OI9 dated 17.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.116 of 2O19 dated 1,9.1L.2O19, in respect of the Plot No.26B in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 / 2O13/Seritingampally/Gopanpally,'said. to have been issued by the District Collector and the.letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated L6.O9.2OL9, bearing Pending Document No.P664 /2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." l3 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch 19 . W. P. No. 592 6 of 2O2l is fiIed with the following prayer: '... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.18177 /GL 12019 dated 1710612020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.73 of 2019 dated l9/1Ll2OI9, in respect of the Plot No.80 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09 /2013 in File No.E5/47 33 I 2ol3/Serilin gampal|y /Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/09/2OLI stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2l / 061 2019, bearing Pending Document No.P384/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..."

20. W.P.No.6234 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.574 /GL l2O2O dated 16/06l2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.81 of 2OL9 dated 19/LL/2OI9, in respect of the Plot No.77 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 261O912013 in File L4 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch ),lo.E5/4733 / 2013 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to rave been issued by the District Collector and the letter rearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2OLl stated to .rave been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, lSerilingampally Mandal, in a selective m€rnner as being ;llegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers :iom jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of :ratural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of t-he Constitution of India and further direct the :-espondents to receive and register the Agreement of iiale-Cum-Irrevocable General Power of Attorney dated t)4/07 /2O 19, bearing Pending Document No. P44l /2019 r:xecuted in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

21. \1r.P.No.6238 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "... to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction tnore particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus rleclaring that the order of the Second Respondent in lrroceedings bearing No. 18187/ Gl l2Ol9 dated '.:.7 /06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Ilespondent in Proceedings bearing No.11l of 20 19 dated '9/lll2o19, in respect of the PIot No.188 in Survey I,los.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Ilerilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File t{o.ES / 4733 /2013 lSerilingampally./Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter trearing No. B/322/2OO7, dated OB/O912011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, fierilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being iflegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of rratural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 1 L / 09 I 2019, bearing Pending Document No.P647 / 2Ot9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..." 15 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

22. W.P.No.5441 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 1836/G | /2O2O dated 16/06/2O2O conf,rrming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.113 of 20 19 dated L9/LL/2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.58 in Survey No.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2013 in File No.E5/4733 I 2013 /Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated O8/O9/2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 2L /08/2019, bearing Pending Document No.P659/2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." W.P.No.5446 of 2O2l is filed with the following 23 prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.587/Gl / 2O2O dated 16.06.2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.12O of 2019 dated 21.1L.2O 19, in respect of the Plot No.38 in Survey Nos.36/AA/7, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification "File

26.09.2013 t6 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/4733 I 2013 lserilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.Bl322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 23.09.2019, bearing Pending Document No. P689/2O19 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..."

24. W.P.No.6771 of 2O2t is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No. 18178/ G\ /2019 dated 17 /06/2020 confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.87 of 20 19 dated l9lll/2o19, in respect of the Plot No.182 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09/2013 in File No.E5/47 33 / 20 73 I Serilingampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District-Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated OS|O9l2oll stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Agreement of Sale cum lrrevocable General Power of Attorney dated ILlOT /2019, bearing Pending Document No. P459/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." t7 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

25. W.P.No.6772 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.592lGl / 2O2O dated L6.O6.2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.152 of 2Ol9 dated 09.12.2OL9, in respect of the Plot No.362 in Survey Nos.36/AA/11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No.E5/4733 /2013 / Serilingampal\y/ Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.L3/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 06.1 1 .2019, bearing Pending Document No.P777 l2Ol9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass ..."

26. W.P.No.6779 of 2O2l is filed with the following prayer "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.593/G 1/2O2O dated 76/06/2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing No.154 of 20 19 dated 09/7212019, in respect of the Plot No.98 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26/09 /2013 in File 18 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch No.E5/47 33 I 2Ol3 I Serilingampally / Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated OSlOgl2OLl stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampatly Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the Sale Deed dated lglll/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P787 /2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." tM.P.No.6781 of 2021 is fi1ed with the following 27 prayel': "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of ttre Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.9352/G 1/2019 dated L7106/2O2O confirming tJ:e Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.40 of 2019 dated 20/O5/2019, in respect of the PIot No.82 in Survey Nos.36/AA/ 14, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26109/2013 in File No. E5/47 33 I 20 13 I Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/32212OO7, dated O8lO9l2O11 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Seritingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers from jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 20l05/2019, bearing Pending Document No. P3O1/2OL9 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..." t9 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

28. W.P.No.8331 of 2027 is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order of the Second Respondent in proceedings bearing No.14009/GI /2OI9 dated O8/O7 /2O2O confirming the Order of the Third Respondent in Proceedings bearing Refusal No.34 of 2019 dated 02/OS|2O19, in respect of the Plot No.51 in Survey Nos.36/AA/11, situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, acting on the alleged notification dated 26.09.2013 in File No. E,5/4733/2013/Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the District Collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2OO7, dated 08.09.2011 stated to have been issued by the Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Serilingampally Mandal, in a selective manner as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary to law, suffers froin jurisdictional errors and violative of the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to receive and register the SaIe Deed dated 02/ OS|2O19, bearing Pending Document No.P262 /2019 executed in favour of the petitioner and pass..."

29. W.P.No.8800 of 2O2L is filed with the following prayer: "...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to register the Sale Deed pending document No.878 of 2O2O submitted by the petitioner for registration with regard to the PIot bearing No.3 Part admeasuring244.44 sq yards in Shilpa Poineer Block-I in Sy.Nos.37 of Gachibowli village, Serilingampally Mandat, RR District vide refusal order No.217 of 2O2O dt.I7 lL2l2O2O as highly illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the 3'a 20 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch respondent to receive, register and release the Sale Deed ['ending Document No.878 of 2O2O submitted by the Jretitioner for registration with regard to the Plot bearing t,lo.3 Part admeasuring244.44 sq yards in Shilpa Poineer Illock-I, in Sy.Nos.37 of Gachibowli village, Iieritingampally Mandal, RR District without reference to the proceedings of the District Collector dt.26.O9-2013 and pass ..."

30. H,eard Mr. B.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for petitioners and Ms. Dara Haritha Kiran learned Assistant Goverrrment Pleader for Revenue for respondents.

31. ',l'he subject matter in all the writ Petitions pertains to Plol.s in various Sub-divisions of Survey No.36 situated at Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. For reference, facts in W.P-No-368L of 2O2L are being considered (Serial No.7 in the batch of writ petitions).

32. It is the grievance of petitioner that respondents are refusing to receive and register the Agreement of Sale-cum- Irrevcrcable General Power of Attorney dated O3.O7.2019 bearing document No.433 of 2019 in respect of Plot No.287 in Sy.No.36/AAl8 (Sub Division No.8 of Sy.No.36) situated at C'opanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is submitted that the document has been 2t JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch kept pending on the file of sub Registrar on the ground. that a notification dated 26.09.2OL3 in File No.E5/4733 I 2ol3lserilingampally/Gopanpally issued. by District collector and the letter bearing No.B/322/2ooT dated 08.09.2011 of the Tahsildar. It is further submitted that Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally, refused the registration of document that the scheduled property is prohibited as per the list furnished by Tahsildar, classified as Poramboke.

33. Attention is invited to Ex.P3 a letter addressed to the Sub-Registrar by Tahsildar.

34. tt is submitted that order of refusal of Sub-Registrar was carried by way of an appeal before the District Registrar and the District Registrar vide pro"..dings dated L7.06-2020 (Ex.Pl) refused registration of the deed on the premise that property in sy.No.36/AA/8 was included in the prohibited property list vide notification in File No.E5/4733/2O13lSerilingampally/Gopanpally, dated

26.09.2013, issued by District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and as such the propert5r could not be registered. 22 w.P.No.4475 of 2o2r&Jffii

35.Itissubmittedthatnotificationrelieduponbythe Registrarinhisord.erdatedlT.06.2o2Oisinparimateriato th,e notification which was the subject matter of challenge beforethisCourtandthatthisCourtinW.P.No.lg069of 2CtL4 by its order dated 25.08.2014 had directed the sub- Rt:gistrar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance strbject to the condition that Sub-Registrar was at liberty to refusetoregisterthedeedsbydulyassigningreasons. placing reliance upon the judgment of the learned single Jrrdge, it is contended that the said notification annexed at Pa.geNo.26beinginparimateriatothatofthenotification under challenge in the W'P'No' 19069 of 2Ol4 ' the notification dated. 26.09.2013 has to receive the same fate'

36. Learned counsel invited the attention of this court to the document annexed. to the counter affidavit filed and submitted that the list communicated by the District collector to commissioner & Inspector General vide letter llo.E I 1447812024, dated 07 .o4.2O25, is a subsequent list e.nd the same cannot be relied upon, as the order of the Ilegistrar and the Sub-Registrar are based on different 23 _ JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch notification (earlier dated) and letter of Tahsildar. It is submitted that by letter dated or.o4.2o25, properties are added to and a revised tist of immovable properties is issued and the said survey number finds place in the said list. It is further submitted that reliance placed on a list dated o7.o4.2o25 is misconceived and is not valid in the eye of law as the rejection orders of both the sub-Registrar and that of Registrar are based on different lists and the letter dated 07.o4.2o25 cannot have a retrospective effect.

37. Placing reliance on the Hon'ble Apex court judgment in Commissioner of Police, Bombag a. Gordhq.nd,q.s Bhonjit, it is contended that orders once made, the purport of the order and content cannot be improvised. and has to be read and understood on the contents qf the ord.er itself. It is further contended that any improvement made by way of counter affidavit or submissions cannot be added to change the purport of the order.

38. Basing on the law laid down by the Honble Apex court, it is contended that notification dated 26.09.2013 of tnn tgsz sc t6 24 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch - \- the offrce of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, fell for consideration before this Court and learned Single Judge of this c,rurt by ord.er dated 25.o8.2O14 in w.P.No.19069 of 2Ol4 <lirected the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of conveyance without reference to the Notification dated 26.09.2013.

39. It is submitted that as the subject matter i.e., plots in various subdivided survey number(s) of sy.No.36 are parcels of land in this batch of writ petitions which pertain to the notification, this Court may consider the order of learned. Single Jud.ge, unless different set of facts are borne out of record.

40. l.t is submitted by learned counsel that as the facts are similar in nature, same order as in W.P.No.19069 of 2OI4 5e passed. 4t. ,3n the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents submitted that on the basis of a communication received, Tahsildar addressed a letter to Sub-Flegistrar, letter dated September, 2O11, that certain 25 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch properties ln Serilingampally Manda1 and the subject property of the writ petitioner was reflected as Government land(s) in the Khasra Pahani, hence prohibited from being registered. It is further submitted that District Registrar on appeal confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notification dated 26.09.2013 issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. That the properties in Sy.No.36/AA one in the prohibited list.

42. It is submitted that District Registrar has not erred in rejecting the documents and as such refusal to receive and register the documents presented by the petitioners in the writ petitions are in accordance with Iaw.

43. Learned counsel relied on the judgment of the Honble Apex Court in Mohinder Singh @ll and another a. The Chief Election Commissioner, Neut Delhi qnd others2, invited the attention of this Court to Paragraph No.8 of the judgment, wherein the observations of Honble Justice Bose in Commissioner of Police, Bonbag a. Gordhand.o.s Bltsnji (L supra) were extracted, on the basis 2 luzs; l scc 4o5 26 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch of the contents, it was contended that notilication of the office ,rf Collector have to be construed on the basis of language used therein.

44. It is submitted that pursuant to Section 22-A of tl:e Registration Act, 1908 (for short 'the Act) varlous notific;rtions were issued across the State by the offices of District Collectors. That one such notification issued by the office ,cf District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, is dated

26.09.2013.It is further submitted that on the information and d:rta collected/gathered at the ground level, properties in various survey numbers have been included in the notification and the notification came to be issued on

26.09.2OL3. It is also submitted that Collector is emporirered to issue notification under Section 22-A of t!l,e Act

45. I t is submitted that upon the exercise of powers under Section 22-A of the Act, lands are included or listed under any of the Sub-Sections of Section 22-A(1)(a-e) of the Act. I1 is further submitted that lands in which the State Gov'ernment has "avowed" or "accrued" interest can also be 27 _ JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch included/listed in the notification under section 22-A of the Act, that the notifications are issued to protect the properties from being claimed as private properties, etc,. It is submitted that the order of the learned single Judge in w.P.No.19069 of 2014 is pertains to set of lands situated in Hafeezpet and the order may not be extended to other areas, as the order is very specific to particular parcels of land. It is further contended that on or.o4.2o25, the said. parcels of land in various subdivided survey numbers of sy.No.36 in Gopanpally village have been notified. It is also contended that the respondents be given liberty to proceed in accordance with law as the said plots in survey numbers have been included in the notification dated oz.o4.2o2s of the oflice of District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

46. Heard learned counsels, perused the'record, considered the submissions.

47. In all these writ petitions, petitioners are purchasers of various plots in the main Survey No.36 of Gopanpatly Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is the specific case of all the petitioners that they presented 28 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2O2l & batch _ sale deeds, development agreements, gift deeds and agre,:ment of sales before the Sub-Registrar, Serilingampally on various dates for registration. That Sub- Regi,strar without assigning any reasons refused regis,tration. It is observed from the record that Sub- Registrar placed reliance on a communication of the office of l'ahsildar (Deputy Collector Cadre), Serilingampally Mandal, dated Ni1.09.201 1, Lr.No.B/ 322 /2017 (Page No.23, P3) and refused registration.

48. On appeal District Registrar confirmed the order of the Sub-Registrar on the basis of notification dated

26.09.2013 issued by the office of District Collector, Ranga Redcty District. That the properties are in prohibited list.

49. It was contended that the Sub-Registrar and the District Registrar on appeal could not have refused registration of documents. It was further contended that the notification dated 26.09.2013 was only a draft notification and the same cannot be relied by the office of District Registrar. 29 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

50. It is pertinent to extract the relevant portion of the notification communicated to the office of Sub-Registrar. The same is as follows: THE RANGA REDDY DISTRICT GAZETTE EXTRA ORDINARY PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY Ranga Reddy District Serilingampally Mandal Rajendranagar Division R.R. No. 86 File No. ES I 47 33 I 2O1 3 / Serilingampally/ Gopanpally Dated: 26-O9-2OL3 Appendix NOTIFICATION In exercise of the powers conferred under G.O.Ms. No. 863 Rev. (Reg.1) Dept., dated: 20-6-200T and CCLA's circular Instructions No. 8L138512012, dated: 29-5-2OI3. The following lands are notified under Section 22-A (Il (a) for the purpose of section 22A(Ll, Notice is hereby given inviting objections and suggestions on the above proposal from all persons who are likely to be affected thereby for being taken into considering by the Government. All objections and suggestions should be in writing in English or in Telugu and should be addressed to the Collector (by designation) of Ranga Reddy District within whose jurisdiction the area lies, so as to reach the oflice of the Collector, Ranga Reddy District on or before the expiry of thirty days from the date of publication of this notification in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette.

51. On a perusal of the notification dated 26.09.2013 communicated which contains the list of prohibited properties, can at best be a notification calling for objections to arrive at a final list of prohibited properties. The notification cannot be termed as a final notification of prohibited properties upon which documents can be refused for registration. The notification relied on by the 30 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch District Registrar cannot be said to be in tune with the law laid dou,n by the Full Bench

52. A similar notification issued on 26.09.2013 fell for conside::ation before this Court in W.P.No.19069 of 2014, with the following prayer: "... to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly on,: in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Ranga Reddy District, Gazette Notification R.R.No.86, 26.09.2013, da'-ed Proc. No. E 5 / 47 33 I 2O 1 3 / Serilingampally / Hafeezpet dt.26.O9.2013 by the 2nd respondent in so far as it rel,a.tes to lands in Sy.No.78 and 80 of Hafeezpet village Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District as illegal, arbitrary anrl contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act an,1 consequently set aside the same and grant such ottLer order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit anrl proper in the circumstances of the case." issued

53. A learned Single Judge of this Court by order dated

25.O8.2O 14 held as follows: Orrler "It is the case of the petitioners I to 3 that they are the owners of the land admeasuring Acs.50,00 guntas in Survey No.78 of Hafeezpet Village. The claim of the 4th petitioner is that he is the owner and he is in pos,session of another extent of land admeasuring Acs,.115.00 guntas in Survey No.80 of Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The petitioners intend to seII the above extents of land and wh,:n they approached the Sub-Registrar, Moosapet, Hyrlerabad-4th respondent, they were informed about the District Gazette notification issued by the District Collector, Ranga Reddy dated 26.09.1913 in which the obj,-.ctions were called from the alfected persons against the proposal to notiff the lands in Survey Nos.77, 78,79 anc. 80 of Hafeezpet Village of Balanagar and 31 - JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch Serlingampally Mandals, Ranga Reddy District covered under C.S.No.14 of 1958 under Section 22-A of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 (for short'the ActJ.

2. I*arned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the said notification is without power or jurisdiction. A notification can be issued concerning the properties which are mentioned in Section 22(A)(1)(e) of the Act by the State Government and the District Collector has no power to noti$r any properties covered by Section 22(AX1)(e) of the Act as the registration of Government lands by way of deeds of conveyance were prohibited. Learned senior counsel placed reliance on earlier orders issued by the Government in memo No.28908/JAL/2OO4-7, dated 05.11.2OO4 and memo No.59734/JA.ll2OO5, dated 18.05.2009, which inter alia disclosed that these lands are treated as private lands and directions were isSued for mutation in terms of the orders in C.S.No.14 of 1958.

3. Learned senior counsel further submits that attempts made by the State Government in this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court have failed and therefore, the above orders are issued. Learned senior counsel therefore submits that the present notification issued by the District Collector treating it as sarkari is contrary to the orders of the Government and the District Collector does not have competence and power to overrule the orders of the Government and noti$ the subject land as sarkari land.

4. The matter underwent .few adjournments at the instance of the learned Advocate General. When the matter is called, the Advocate General produced a memo filed by the 2nd respondent, wherein reference was made to the order of status quo passed by the Supreme Court in SL,A (C) No(s).17362-17363/2O14 and also orders passed by the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District in Case No.D5/5472/2OL4, dated 06.08.2014, suspending the mutation granted in respect of M/s.Savera construction.

5. Learned Advocate General submitted that in view of the order o f status quo granted by the Supreme Court and further orders passed by the Joint Collector suspending ttre mutation orders passed in favour of M/s.Savera construction, no further action can be taken. 32 _ JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch

6. Learned Advocate General submits that the lands in Strrvey Nos.77, 78, 79 and 8O of Hafeezpet Village are G<,ver-nment lands and that the Government is taking appropriate stePs in this regard.

7. As regards the rival contentions on various issues concerning status of land and Government right to assert its title that cannot be gone into in this case' g. The only issue for consideration in this writ petition is whether the notification issued by the District collector arnounts to prohibition of registration of lands mentioned therlin concerning Survey Nos'77 to 8O of H;efeezpet Village in purported exercise of power under Sr:ction 22(A)(1)(e) of the Act. g. Learned Advocate General submits that the notification in question is not issued under the above sedd provision and that it is erroneously mentioned- and ttiat ihe power is vested to issue a notification only in ttre State Government under Section 22( )(21of the Act' Frrrther the State Government is entitled to call for the 16:port from the District collector and the notification isiued on 26.09.2013 is for the purpose of compiling the ir:rformation and submitting a report to the State Government to enable it to issue a notification under S,:ction 22( l(21 of the Act.

11. In other words, learned Advocate General fairly srrbmits that there is no notification issued as on today under Section 22t l?l of the Act. It is further submitted that only after receipt of report from the District Collector and after examining the-same by the State Government, appropriate action as warranted by law rrore particularly under Section 22(Al(21 of the ' {'ct u'ould be taken. 1 1. In view of the submission of learned Advocate C,eoe r21, it is made clear that notification dated 26.09.2013 is not a notification under Section 22(Al(2) of the Act and since, as on today, there is no such notification issued under Section 22(Al(21 of the Act, there is no restraint on the registering authority to r,:ceive and process the deeds of conveyance concerning tlre lands in Survey Nos.79 to 8O of Hafeezpet Village.

12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to receive and process the deeds of a 33 w.P.No.4475 of 2021.'*[i conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26.09.2013 in accordance with the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. However, it is open to the registering authorit5i to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if he has any other objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that mere registration of deed of conveyance does not confer title to the propert5r and it is made clear that this order does not preclude the Government to take appropriate steps as warranted by law and to assert its title. No costs."

54. This court has taken note of the order of the learned Single Judge and the submissions made by learned Advocate General in the matter in W.P.No.19069 of 2014.

55. The notification that fell for consideration in W.P.No.19069 of 20 14 and the notification in these writ petitions is pari materia, it is apparent that the notifications issued are on the same day by the office of the District collector. Having perused the order of the learned Single Judge, this Court is of the view that the contention, that, order in W.P.No.19O69 of 2014, is applicable to the facts of the case is tenable and valid.

56. Be that as it ffiey, the learned Single Judge at Paragraph No.12 held as follows: 34 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch *12. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar to re-ceive and process the de:eds of conveyance without reference to the District Gazette notification dated 26'09'2013 in accordance wlth the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Sl.amp Act, 1899. H-owever, it is open to the registering authority to refuse to register the deeds presented before him, if ire has any othir objection, by duly assigning in suppori of such decision and communicate r€:aSooS ttre decision to itre petitioners' It is made clear that mere rrgistration of deedof conveyance does not confer title to ttrE p.op"rt5r and it is made clear that this order does nct prectuai tfre Government to take appropriate s-teps *L.rrrrted by law and to assert its title' No costs'" ",,

57. This court is not inclined to take a different view from v/hat has been held in the order of learned Single Judge at Paragraph No.12, the same view is endorsed by this Court.

58. lr FuIl Bench of this Court in Viniamuri Raiagopala Charg, q.nd others a. Principal Secretary, Reaenue Depantment, Hgderq.bqd. and otherss, dealt with respect to the entire gamut of section 22-A of the Act. Further a Division Bench of this court in a batch of writ petitions, consictered the validity of Section 22-A of the Act as incorp,olatedintheRegistrationAct,lgO8videA'R' Amen,cment Act No.19 0f 2007 with effect from 20.06-2007. 3 2Ol5 SCC OnLine Hyd 4o7 35 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch The validity of section 22-A of the Act was upheld by the Division Bench in rnuecta Technologies priaate Limited. and Others a. Goaernntent of Andhrq. prad.esh, Hgderabad qnd others+. A combined read.ing of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this court and the Division bench and various orders in writ petitions, it is evident that any refusal for registering a property by an office of sub- Registrar can be only in accordance with the Act and as per the law laid down by the Full Bench. The notification issued in not in accordance with law.

59. In Vinjamuri Rajagopala Chary and. others a. Principal Secretdr!, Reaenue Departmen4 llgd.erq.bad qnd others (3 supra), the Full Bench summarised the conclusions at Paragraph No.158 (in the forr4 of points from I to XV), the relevant points in the present context are as follows: "158. We, thus, summarize our conclusions and issue directions as follows : - (i) The authorities mentioned in the guidelines, which are obliged to prepare lists of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d), to be sent to the registering authorities under the provisions of Registration Act, 02023 SCC Online TS 4565 36 t - JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021& batch s.:rall clearly indicate the relevant clause under which ere,ch propert5l is classified. (ii) lnsofar as clause (a) is concerned, the cr)rrcern€d District Collectors shall also indicate the s:atute under which a transaction and its registration is prohibited. Further in respect of the properties covered under clause (b), they shall clearly indicate which of the Governments own the propert5l. (iii) Insofar as paragraphs (3) and (41 in the Guidelines, covering properties under clause (c) and (d) are concerned, the authorities contemplated therein shall also forward to the registering authorities, along ',r'ith lists, the extracts of registers/gazette if the property is covered by either endowment or wakf, and declarations/orders made under the provisions of Ceiling Acts if the propert5r is covered under clause (d). (iv) ..-... v) No notification, contemplated by sub-section (:l) of Section 22A, is necessary with respect to the properties falling under clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (:.) of Section 22-4. (vi) ..... (vii) The registering authorities would be justified ilr refusing registration of documents in respect of the properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A provided the authorities contemplated under the guidelines, ds aforementioned, have ccmmunicated the lists of properties prohibited under these clauses. (viii) The concerned authorities, which are obliged t<> furnish the lists of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A, and the ccncerned Registering Oflicers shall follow. the guidelines scrupulously. (ix) It is open to the parties to a document, if the rr:levant property/land finds place in the list of properties covered by clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 22-A, to apply for its deletion from the list or nrodification thereol to the concerned authorities as provided for in the guidelines- The concerned authorities are obliged to consider the request in proper perspective and pass appropriate order within six weeks from the date of receipt of the application and make its copy available to the concerned party. *:{.....xv." 37 W.P.No.4475 of 2021"'#;i

60.Itissubmittedbylearned'counselforofficial respondentsthatbyletterdatedo7.o4.2o2',officeof DistrictCollectorCommunicatedalistofprohibited properties to the office of Sub-Registrar(s) (through the office of IG) and authorities be granted liberty to initiate stepsoractinthelightofthenewlistdatedo7.o4.2o25. Needless to state that authorities are empowered und.er law and are not precluded to act within the frame work of Iaw. 6l.Itissubmittedthatpursuanttointerimdirections documents presented were received'' registered and released in the batch of writ petitions' In view of the submissions made, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are necessary as far as registration of documents is concerne d. "q7ta" the petitioners in the batch of writ Petitions

62. Having consid'ered the entire factual matrix of the case, the order of the learned' Single Judge' the law laid downbytheFultBench,theDivisionBenchofthisCourt andtheAct,thisCourtisoftheopinionthattheorderof respondent No-2 bearing No' 18183/G L l2Ol9 dated <. 38 JAK,J W.P.No.4475 of 2021 & batch L7 /06/2020 acting on the alleged notification dated

26.O9.2013 File No.E5/4733/2013 Serilingampally/Gopanpally, said to have been issued by the Dj.strict Collector, confirming the Order of the Third Respo:rdent in Refusal No.76 of 2O19 dated 19lll/2019, acting on the alleged letter bearingNo.B/322/2007, dated O8/O9/2011, are set aside.

63. Ile that as it may, Authorities are not precluded from taking steps as warranted by law, 1n respect of the prohitrited properties communicated uide letter dated

07.04.2025, by office of District Collector to the office(s) of Sub-Registrar(s) (through the office of IG).

64. lior reasons aforesaid, Writ Petitions are allowed " qua" tbe writ petitioners, "qud' the prayers. No costs. .Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petitic,n shall stand closed. Date: ()6. 10.2025 plp/vp,t ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J