Sadu Narasimha Reddy v. 1. The State of Telangana

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the respondents to issue notice to the petitioner in the land acquisition proceedings of Pharma City Project for the land situated in Sy.No.91/EE/3 in Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belonging to the petitioner in the interests of justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to pay compensation to any party for the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No. 91lEEl3, situated at Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.SURESH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION W.P.NO:3455 OF 2025 Between: Saddipalli Narasimha Reddy, S/o. S.Bal Reddy, Hindu, aged about 38 years, Occ; Service, No. 2-3-64514110, Prem Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (LA and JA), Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Pdncipal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. Telangana State lndustrial Corporation (TSllC), Rep. by its V.C. and M.D., Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad.

4. The Commissioner, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Govt. of Telangana, Buddha Bhavan, Hyderabad.

5. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

6. The Additional Collector and Administrator, R and R Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

7. The Land Acquisition Officer cum RDO, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Andukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 9. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the respondents to issue notice to the petitioner in the land acquisition proceedings of Pharma City Project for the land situated in Sy.No. 91/AA in Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belonging to the petitioner in the interests of justice. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to pay compensation to any party for the land of. the petitioner situated in Sy.No. 91/AA situated at Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI P.SURESH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION W.P.NO: 3462OF 2025 Between: Paisa Mahesh Goud, S/o. Pentaiah, Hindu, aged about 62 years, Occ ; Business, F/o. B-12611, Mytripuram Colony, (Karmanghat)' Hyderabad. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,.Revenue Department (LA and JA), Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. Telangana State lndustrial Corporation (TSllC), Rep. by its V.C. and M'D Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad. '

4. The Commissioner, Rehabilitation and Resettlernent, Govt. of Telangana, Buddha Bhavan, Hyderabad.

5. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

6. The Additional Collector and Administrator, R and R Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

7. The Land Acquisition Officer, cum RDO, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Andukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 9. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the respondents to issue notice to the petitioner in the land acquisition proceedings of Pharma City Project for the land situated in Sy.No. 91/AA in Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belonging to the petitioner in the interests of justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to pay compensation to any party for the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.No. 9'1/AA, situated at Punjaguda Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the interests of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI P.SURESH Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court at the stage of admission made the following COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SRI ruSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.3388.3455 an d3462 of2025 COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions are filed seeking to issue direction to the respondents to issue notice to the petitioners in the land acquisition proceedings of Pharma City Project for the land situated in Sy.Nos-9 l/6a 13,91/er in Punjaguda Village' Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (herein after referred to as'subject property') belonging to the petitioners'

2. Since the issue raised in these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by way of this common

3. Heard Sri P.Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioners and leamed Govemment Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.l and 9.

4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties' the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission' 2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petltioners have purchased the lands to an extent of Ac.0.36 gts. in Sy.Nos.g 1/6al3, Acs.0. I 5 and I .00 grs. in Sy.No.9 l/es, through registered sale deeds dated 04. lO.2023 from the original owners by paying valuable sale consideration and since then they have been in possession and enjoyment of the subject property. He further submits that the respondent authorities witl.rout issuing notice and without following the due procedure as contemplated under law, are trying to take possession of the subject property for the purpose of establishing pharmacity. .fherefore. Petitioners have submitted representations before respondent No'9 on 28.0r-2025, requesting him to issue norice to them, before initiating land acquisition proceedings. Inspite of the same, respondent N.9 has not taken any steps to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners and the action of respondents No.9 is gross violation of principies of natural J ustlce

6. per contra, Iearned Government pleader for Land on the instructions furnished bv Acquisition) *basing J respondent No.9, submits that the respondent authorities initiated proceedings exercising the powers conferred under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2Ol3 (herein after called as 'Act 30 of 2Ol3') and issued notification under Section I l(1) ofthe Act 30 of 2013 and thereafter, passed award on 3O.04'2022, aft'er following due procedure as contemplated under the Act 30 of I \ 20 13, He further submits that the petitioners purchased the t I subject property, subsequent to initiation of land acquisition proceedings under the provisions of the Act and passing of the award. Hence, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are not maintainable under law.

7. Having considered the rival submissions made by the respective parties and after perusal of the material available on record, it reveals that petitioners are claiming rights over the subject property, pursuant to registered sale deeds dated

04.10.2023, whereas respondent No.9 had initiated land acquisition proceedings on 2O -06.2018 and passed award on

30.04.2022. Hence, this Court is of the considered view that 4 the petitioners are not entitled fbr the relief sought in the writ petitions. However, liberty is grantecl to petitioners to avail the remedies as available under law. 8 Accordingly, the writ peritions are dismissed. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL S ANT REGISTRAR A ECTION OFFICER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (LA and JA), Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, State of Telangana at Hyderabad'

2. The Principal Secretary, lndustries and Commerce , Secretariat, State of I Telangana at Hyderabad.

3. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana State lndustrial Corporation (TSllC), Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad.

4. The Commissioner, Rehabilitation and Resettlement, Govt of Telangana' Buddha Bhavan, HYderabad.

5. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex' Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

6. The Ad6itional bollector and Administrator, R and R Ranga Reddy District, Collectorate Complex, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

7. The Land Acquisiiion Officer, cum RDO, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

8. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Andukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' g.TheRevenueDivisionalofficer,KandukurMandal,RangaReddyDistrict. '10.Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTI 1 1.One CC to SRI P.SURESH' Advocate IOPUCI 12. Two CD Copies sAaso'u HIGH COURT DATED:0610212025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.3388, 3455 AND 3462 of2025 J o o o a, * g rtE. S I.l 2 X ,tutt M { /\rCHEO )+ o,: i(, f DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. \ , 'l