1. The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar v. '1 . The Labourt Court-lll, Hyderabad

Judgment

2. The Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad D.Krishnaiah, S/o. D.Dharmaiah, aged about 41 years, C/o. M.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate, 4-7 -1 O40, lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad. (Rl is not necessary party) ..,PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 'lst respondent in lD.No.B9 of 2003 and issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in lD.No.B9 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 published on 16.5.2006 holding the same as illegal, unjust contrary to law perverse and without jurisd iction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22617 OF 20061 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 suspend the operation of the Award passed in lD.No.g9 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 on the file of the Labour court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.89/2003 on the file of the Labour court.lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Hon'ble court dated zol12l2o19 made in w.p.No.1B013/2006, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: Gp FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: cp FOR LaeOUn Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRl M.VlJAy KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETITION NO :17962 0F 2006 Between: The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. il1.',J:?:xF3ll;:,1irH5,"i:fl A3;Si1,;rtlfl ?lx;'&l*n,Andhrapradesh, ...PETITIONERS 1 2 AND '1 . The Labourt Court-lll, Hyderabad 2. B. Shankara Chary, S/o. B.Rama Chary, aged about 40 vears. C/o. M. Vijayakumar, Advocate, 4-7 -1 O4O, tsamiyi'Oaz"ai,-UvO"rrtuil, vqr s' \ ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to call foi the records from the 1't respondent in lD.No.90 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, particurarry one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1"t respondent in l.D No.90 of 2003 dt'9-3-2006 pubrished on 16.05.2006, hording the same as iilegar, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22533 OF ?OOG 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award passed in lD No.90 of 2003 dt:9-3-2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll: Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.90/2003 on the file of the Labour Court lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court daled 2011212019 made in W P No 1796212006, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 17423 OF 2006 Between:

1. The District Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Andhra Pradesh,, Andhra Pradesh, 4th Floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. AND

1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. 2. B. Sunil Singh, S/o. Pratap Singh, aged about 40 years, C/o. M. Vijaya kumar, Advocate, 4-7 -1 040, lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad. Rl is not nec'essary party ...PETITIONERS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1't respondent in lD.No.B4 of 2003 and issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ ...RESPONDENTS of certiorari and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in lD.No.g4 of 2003 dated 09.03.2006 pubtished on'16.05.2006, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(w PMP. NO:21836 oF 2006) Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award passed in lD No. 84t20o3, dt. 9-3-2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. tA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9.3.2006 made in l.D.No.B4l2003 on the file of the Labour court.lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Hon'ble court dated 2011212019 made in w.p.No.1742312006 pending disposat of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: Gp FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 18 007 0F 2006 Between:

1. The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Director of rreasuries and Accounts, Andhra pradesh,, Andhra pradesh, 4th Floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, ebids, HyderabiO. " - - ---' AND 1

2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. K.Thirupathi Reddy, S/o.Chandra Re{dy, aged about 40 years, Cio. M.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate,' 4-l -1 0 40, lsamiya Bdzar; HyJerabad. R1 is not necessary party ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS 5 Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD No.85 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No.g5 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 published on 16.5.2O06, holding the same as iilegal, unjust, contrary to Law, perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22608 0F 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award passed in lD No.85 of 2003 dt. 9.3.2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.85/2003 on the file of the Labour Court.lll, Hyderqbad, pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 2011212019 made in W.P.No.1800712006, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNTNG Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 18230 0F 2006 Between: '1 . The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts,, Andhra Pradesh, Andhra pradesh, 4th Floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. AND 1 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS 6

2. Abdul Kaliq Taj, aged about 40 years, C/o. M. Vijaya Kumar, Advocate, 4-7- 1040, lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad. (R1 is not necessary party) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD No. 83 of 2003 and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No. 83 of 2003 dated 9-3-2006 published on 16-5-2006, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to Law, perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22903 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award passed in lD No. 83 of 2003 dated 9-3-2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.83/2003 on the file of the Labour Court lll, Hyderabad, pursUant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 201'12/2O19 made in W.P.No.18230/2006, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. ) Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 18241 oF 2006 Between: 1 . The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Director of rreasuries and Acco_unts, Andhra pradesh, Andhra pradesh, 4th Floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. AND

2. The Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. Narsimulu, s/o_late Narayana, aged about 46 years, C/o M.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate 4-7-1040, lsamiya Ba2ar, Hyderabad. Rl is not necessary party. ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of ihe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD No.g7 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, pa(icularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No.g7 of 2003 dated 9-3-2006 published on 16-5-2006, holding the same as iilegat, unjust, contrary to law perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22917 OF 2006) Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award passed in lD No.g7 of 2003 dt.9-3-2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under sectiJn 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enfo-rcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.g7l2003 on the file of the Labour court lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 2O11212O19 made in W p No 18241t20O6, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. ;-*.*n,t;**is i'.:*.r-1 8 Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 18245 OF 2006 Between:

1. The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar. 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts,, Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, 4th floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. AND 1 2 The Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. Abdul Wahed Taj, S/o. Md. lsmail Taj, aged about 37 years, C/o.M.Vijaya Kumar, advocale, 4-7-1040, lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad. (Rl is not necessary party) ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD No.91 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the Award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No.91 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 published on 16.5.2006, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to Law, perverse and without jurisdiction.- l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 22922OF 2006) Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award passed in lD No.91 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.9'l/2003 on 9 the file of the Labour Court lll, Hyderabad' pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 20t1212O19 made in W P No 18245t2006' pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel for the Respondent No'1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No'2: SRI M'VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETIT ION NO: 183 16 0F 2006 Between:

1. The District Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar' 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts' Andhra Pradesh' Andhra Pradesh' ' .iiiiri.jf iXFcr-i euildins, rilak Road, Abids' Hvd' ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad' Naoender Rao, S/o. Shanker, aged- about.41 .years' C/o Adiocate, 4-7 -1 O4o, lsamiya Bazar, HyoeraDao' M. Vijaya Kumar, R1 is not necessary Party ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD'No'86 of 2003 and issue an appropriate.Writ, Order or direction' particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No 86 of 2003 dt. 9.3.2006 published on 16'5 2006, holding the same as illegal' unjust' contrary to Law, perverse and without lurisdiction' l.A. NO:1 oF 2006 PMP. N 0223013 oF 2006 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated intheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition'theHighCourtmaybepleasedto suspend the operation of the award passed in l'D'No'86/2003' Dt' 9'03'2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad' i 1l 10 lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed, in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in l.D.No.86/2003 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 2ot12l2o1g made in W P No 18316/2006, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 18708 OF 2006 Between:

1. The Dist. Treasury Officer, [\rlahabubnagar. 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, 4th Floor, APGLI Building, Tilak Road, Abids, Hyderabad. AND 1 2 The Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad. Md.Jamal, S/o Md.Janimiya, aged about 41 Advocate, 4-7 -1 04O, lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad years, C/o M.Vijaya Kumar, R1 is not necessary party. .,PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD No.88 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in lD No.gg of 2003 dated 9-3-2006 published on 16-5-2006, holding the same as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction. / l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006{WPMP. NO: 23523 0F 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the award passed in lD No-88 of 2003 dt.9-3-2006 on the file of the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad.

1.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 9063 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondentsMrit Petitioners to pay the minimum wages as fixed in G.O.Rt.No.2501 Finance (SMPC) Department dated 13.07.2006. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in LD.No.88i2003 on the file of the Labour Court.lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 2011212019 made in W.P.No.18708/2006, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 18719 OF 2006 Between:

1. The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mababubnagar. 2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, 4th floor, APGLI Building, Tilak road, Abids, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS AND '1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad 12 ,/, ,/

2. D.Satyanarayana, S/o.D.Narsimulu aged about 37 years, C/o. M.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate, 4-7-1O4O lsamiya Bazar, Hyderabad. (Rl is not necessary party) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st respondent in lD-No.82 of 2003 and issue an appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and quash the award passed by the 1st respondent in lD.No.B2 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 published on 16.5.2006 holding the same as illegal, unjust contrary to law perverse and without jurisdiction. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 23539 OF 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Award passed in lD.No.82 of 2003 dated 9.3.2006 on the file of the Labour court-lll, Hyderabad. lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the enforcement of Award dated 9/3/2006 made in I D No 8212003 on the file of the Labour Court lll, Hyderabad, pursuant to the order passed by this Honble Court dated 2011212019 made in W P No 1871912006, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING Counsel forthe- Respondent No.l: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI Dr. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDTIA WRIT PETITION Nos. 18O 13 17962 17423 1aoo7 18230. I 8241. 1a245. 18316, 18708 & 18719 of20o,6 COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions are liled seeking following relief: ".........to issue an appropriate writ, direction or an order more particularly one in the nature of "Writ of Certiorari" calling for the records relating to the orders dated 09.03.2006 passed in I.D.Nos.82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 and 91 of 2003 on the hle of l,abour Court-lll, Hyderabad........" 2 These writ petitions are flled by the District Treasury Oflicer, Mahabubnagar against the award of the Industrial Tribunal dated O9.03.20O6 passed in I.D.Nos.82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87,88, 89, 9O artd 9l of 2OO3.

3. Respondents herein were appointed as Section Writers in District Treasury Office, Mahabubnagar on 03.O5.1985 and worked as such till 31.07.1987 and again appointed on

05.08.1987 and worked up to 14.O3.1988 and were dismissed and thereupon approached A.P- Administrative Tribunal in R.P.No.8633 of 89 and batch ald the said petitions were allowed. For implementation of the said orders, respondents frled W.P.No.4I24 of 7990 before this Hon'ble Court and in all the matters interim order was granted on 25.07.1990 and $ {. 1 ..1 2 finally disposed of writ petition by order dated 2g.O7.2OOO for ordering to comply with the order of Administrative Tribunal. Respondents herein sought for regtiarization of their post as cashier by filing W.P.No. 1O937 of l98Z and when the petition came for frnal hearing, it was represented by the Government that they have been regularized and accordingly this Hontrle Court passed orders on lT.l7.l98T by making interim order as hnal order but tlle rea.l facts is that the respondents herein were not regularized and they are out of emplo5,.rnent from

15.03.1988. However, respondents herein worked for more than 24O days of service and their services were terminated. After termination of respondents from service, petitioners herein engaged 17 workmen and their services were regularized. Respondents got issued legal notices ald they were received by the petitioners herein but there was no reply. Therefore, respondents herein filed petitions before the Industria-l Tribunal to set aside the termination orders as illegal since in violation of provisions of I.D. Act arrd to reinstate them with all benefits.

4. In a counter frled by the petitioners herein it is averred that the District Treasury Officer was permitted to engage persons on remuneration basis. Initially, 27 individuals have applied voluntarily and are entrusted with the work. After I NGO's strike was called off seven persons were asked not to attend the office frorn 29.12.79A6 arld remaining 2O persons were appointed as section writers and were terminated and they were in service for a period of seven months. For second time all tJle above ten persons were reappointed on

08.08.1987 ald worked up to 14.03.1988 and they were terminated from 14.03.1988. When they filed W.P.No.10937 of 1987 for regularization of service, as per interim order in that matter, respondents were re-engaged on sane terms w.e.f., 05.08.1987 and the said interim order was merged in the frnal order on 27.71.1987 in W.P.No. 1O937 of 1987. Government transferred the respondents herein from Social Welfare Pensioners Scheme to the Revenue Department ald issued notification through emplo5rment exchange, accordingly, 17 candidates were selected and their services were regularized as per rules issued by Government vide G-O.Ms.No.193 dated 14.03.1990. It is informed to the Hon'ble High court that there is ban on recruitment of a1l posts ald the case of the respondents herein in W.P.No.10937 of 1987 will be considered after the ban is lifted. It was contended that District Treasury Ofhce will not come under the dehnition of industry. \ t 4

5. Respondents herein were examined as W.W.1 in all the matters and got marked Exs.W.l to W.14. M.W.l is examined on behalf of the petitioners herein and Exs.M.1 to M. 17 were marked.

6. The Industrial Tribunal considering the oral and documentaqr evidence of both sides set aside the retrenchment order dated 14.03.1988 with a direction to reinstate the respondents herein as section writers with continuity of service with wages at Rs.375/ per month but without back wages and attendant benefrts and also directed to implement the same within one month and aggrieved by the order passed by the Tribunal, these writ petitions are ltled by the District Treasury Officer ald the Director of Treasuries ald Accounts. 7 . It seems that along with the batch of writ petitions hled by the District Treasury Offrce, the respondents herein also frled another batch of writ petitions questioning non-gralting of back wages to them but the said writ petitions hled for non-granting of back wages were dismissed conhrming the orders of the Tribunal and also in a common order dated

20.12.2019 in a batch of writ petitions passed by this Court it was held as follows: .:' 5 "In view of the submissions, this Court is of the considered view that when the awards passed by the Labour Court are confrrmed by this Court in W.P.No.8092 of 2008 and batch dated 25.10.2018, the same analog/ has to be applied in respect of the present writ petitions also. Therefore, there are no merits in t}re writ petitions and the sarne a.re liable to dismissed. Accordingly, the writ peLitions are dismissed confirming the awards dated 09.03.2006 passed by the Labour Court in I.D.Nos.82, 83, 84, 85, a6, a7, AA' 49, 9O and 91 of 2OO3 in the following writ petitions:

51.No. I.D.No. Writ Petitiotr No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10. 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 W.P.No.18719 of 2006 W.P. No.18230 of 2006 W.P.No.17423 of 2OO6 W.P.No. raOOZ of ZOO6 W.P.No. 18316 of 2006 W-P.No.18241of20O6 W.P.Wo. TAZOA ot ZOO6 W.P.No. 18O 13 of 2O06 W.P.No.17962 of 2006 W.P.No.18245 of 2006 Icarned counsel for the respondents contended that 8. already- this Court conflrmed order of the I'D Tribunal ald thus there are no merits in the present writ petitions arrd also \ I { / 6 contended that against the said orders, writ appeal was preferred but later department withdrawn the same with a liberty to hle review application before the Single Judge and the review application filed before the Single Judge was allowed.

9. Admittedly, the depa-rtment as well as respondents herein before the I.D Tribunal preferred two batches of cases against the orders of the Industrial Tribunal. The respondents before ttre I.D Tribunal sought for back wages but it was not considered and the order of the Tribunal regarding the reinstatement with attendant benehts was conhrmed as such this Court opines that there is no need to go into the merits of tJ e case and to pass another order against the order of the contemporar5r Bench ald also of the considered view that the orders passed by the contemporary Bench holds good.

10. In the result, all the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// S D/- A.SRINIV A\SISTANT ASA REDDY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER h To,

3. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-lll, Hyderab The Dist. Treasury Officer, Mahabubnagar' The Director of Treasuries and Accounts,. Andhra Pradesh' Andhra Pradesh' .iinir"iii AFeit ouiidinss, Tilak road, Abids, Hvderabad' c6l)* :,:"'::i' j,' ..r1i18.L.,..,;,',. 7 \

4. One CC to SRI M.V|JAYA KUMAR GOUD, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to SRI Dr. CHALLA SRTNIVASA REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 6 Iwo CCs to Gp FOR t Telangana at nyoeraurilffiE & PLANNING, High court for the state of ' Iyj"[f:o'o GP FoR LABouR, Hish court for the state of reransana at BSR b t4 HIGH COURT DATED: 1710312025 I \ oR THE S l4 o (-) 2l ,tuu y5, ( ( I COMMON ORDER WP. Nos. 1 80 1 3, 17 962, 17 423, 18007, 18230, 18241, 18245,18316, 18708 & 18719 0F 2006 DISPOSING OF ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUT COSTS @ crt' 8*--- <(6\ar