1. Alla Vishnu Vardhan Reddy v. 1. The State of Telangana

2. Sri Chandraniouli kalyan Chakravarthy, S/o. Krishna Mohan, Age- 49 years Occ- Private Employee, Ri/o. Flat No. 301, Vamshi plaza,3-S4I3O1 , Friends Colony, Uppal, Hyderabad, T.G. ...RespondenUDefacto-Complainant Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No. 11621 of 2024 on the file of the court of the XIV Addt. chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad relangana state which arose out of crime No'.18412o24 of panjagutta Police statioh, Hyderabad Police commissionerate in the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioners in C.C.No.'1 162112024 on the file of the court of the XIV Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narhpally, Hyderabad Telangana state. which arose out of Crime No 78412024 of Panjagutta Police station, Hyderabad Police Commissionerate Pending disposal of the quash petition before this Honorable court, in the interest of Justice. l.A. Nos:2&3of 2025 Between: Sri Chandramouli kalyan Chakravarthy, S/o. Krishna Mohan, Age- 49 years Occ- Private Employee, Rl/o. Flat No. 301 , Vamshi Plaza,3-541301 , Friends Colony, Uppal, Hyderabad, T.G. ... Petitioner/Defacto-Complai nant AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High court, Hyderabad ... Res pondenUCom plainant 2 Alla Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, S/o..glla Srinivas Reddy, Age 28 years, Occ- private Employee, R|/o.3230 16'n Ave West, Seattle, WA, USA,98119 Permanent Address H.No.2-95, Plot No. 456, Pragathi Nagar,Bct6 Kukatpally, Hyderabad, T.G. Rep by it's GPA Holder L. Santha Kumari (Mother) W/o. Srinivas Reddy as per Court order dated 03-03-2025, vide I.A.Nd.4 of 2O2S in Crlp.No.'1650 of 2025 K. Srilaya, W.{o Alla Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, Age 26 years, Occ- House wife, Ryo. 3230 16'' Ave West, Seattle, WA, USA,.981 19 Permanent Address H.No. !-!5, Plot No- 456, Pragathi Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, T.G. Rep by it's GPA Holder.Kolli Sanjeeva Reddy (father) S/o. Rami Reddy, as per Court order dated 03-03-2025, vide l.A.No.4 of 2025 in Crlp.No 1650 of 2025 3 ...RespondenUAccused Petition under Section 359 Fl/w 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant permission to file compound petition to compound the offence with the respo nd ents/accused who are the Petitioners in the above Crl.P. No 12025 on the file of this Hon'ble court which filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 1162112024 on the file of the court of the XIV Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narnpally, Hyderabad Telangana state which arose out of Crime No 78412024 of Panjagutta Police station, Hyderabad Police Cornmissionerate, and pass other order or orders, which may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstance of the case /

1.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under section 482 ot cr.p c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Fetition,the High court may be pleased ro record compromise and permit the petitiorier/ Defacto- complainant to compound the offence with the accused who is the petitioner in crl.P.No. 12025 on the fite-of this Hon'ble High court, which filed to quash the proceedings in c.c. No. 1162112024 on the file of the.court of the XIV Addl. chief Judicial ft/agi?!rate, Nampaily, Hyderabad reiangana state which arose.out of crime No 78412024 of panjagutta porice station, Hyderabad potice Com m'issionerate and pass This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Dr challa srinivasa Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and the Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Muthyala Venkatesh Guna, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 0F 2025 ln/And CRIMINAL P ETITION No. '1650 0F 2025 COMMON OR DER This Criminal petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashment of the proceedings in c.c. No. 11621 ot2024, on the fire of the XIV Additionat Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampafly, Hyderabad, against the petitioners.

2. The petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 in the calendar case registered for the offences punishabre under sections 118(2),221 ,224 read with Section 49 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNS, 2023') and section 1 g7 of the Motor vehicres Act. .l 988

3. Heard Dr.Challa Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-state and Mr.Muthyara Venkatesh Guna, rearned counser for the respondent No.2tdeiacto complainant

4. Pending this petition, the parties have entered into the compromise and, accordingly, responde nr No.zl de-facfo complainant filed r.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 with the prayer to permit them to enter into compromise 2 ,\7',I{./ I l.|ro..2,tnd ) ol 202) tt/ und L.rl.l'..ro.l 6)0 al 2025 and by recording the settlement to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.1 1621 oI 2024.

5. This Court vide ordet dated 03 03.2025 referred the parties to the High Court Legal Services Committee for identification and to verify the voluntariness in arriving the settlement. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has submitted report dated 07.032025 stating that the parties are identified by their respective counsel and also on verification of Aadhar Cards/ldentity Cards and the enquiries reveal that the parties have willful and without coercion entered into settlemenUcompromise 6 I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel and perused the materials on record.

7. Having considered the allegations, the nature of charged offences and taking into account the amicable settlement between the parties and to restore peace between the parties, in the light of the dictums in Gian Singh v. Stafe of Punjab and anotherl and Anil Mishra v. State of tJ.P.2; State of Madhya Fradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and ofherss, this Court is- of the considered view that quashment of the impugned | 2012 (10) SCC 303 , 2024 INSC 189 I zo19 (5) scc 688 2 ,\'ni,/ L,1.Nor2 and ) o/ 202i in/and Crl.l'.No. t650 ol 2025 proceedings in view of the setflement by exercising jurisdiction under Section 482.Cr.pClS2B of BNSS,2023, would be in the interest of justice

8. Accordingry, rA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are afiowed. consequenfly, all the proceedings in C.C.No..l 1621 of 2024, pending on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judiciat tVtagistrate, Nampaily, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2. 9 ln the above terms, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY// Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER \ The XIV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nam ally, Hyderabad. The Station House Officer, Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] One CC to Sri Dr Challa Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Muthyala Venkatesh Guna, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 1 2 3 4 5 6 (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) --l HIGH COURT DATED:1 110312025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.1650 of 2025 I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 202i ARE ALLOWED, DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION r-i ! I BE Sr4 rg q 'J c (.) e 0 2 rAY 20?5 I O6 S r^T(:rrF9- a ry- =.,/ C /, rN rHE HrGH couRffo* tl=r:lrfE BETWEEN: 22 oF rEH|N2G#NA Ar HYDERABAD

1. Alla Vishnu Vardhan Reddy' S/o' Alla Srinivas Reddy' ' tx ll*t'Tf; [J:"'ti:If,5:'fi,?, u']."J'.?., Permanent Address r''*J'1=-ti' ir"irlr"' +so' Pragathi Nasar'Bct6 Kukatpally' Hyderabad' T'G';ntnu ReP bY it's GPA Holder rrruri (Mother) w/o. srinivas Reddy ,/

7. K. Srilaya, W/o Alla Vishnu Vardhan Reddy' '' ns"'i6'v;..s,,o*' I:'il#'j?,", *0, usA, e'lle n7o. 3230 16th Ave Wes Permanent Address H'N;'"2'G' ptot t'to' 456' Pragathi Nagar' n$t'r"ll :'X ilSirX? J;fi l' nj eeva Reddv (rather) s/o' Ra mi oLolJ*,o *.*, / And

1. The State of Telangana'. - Rep by its Public Prosecutor' High court, HYderaoao' ....RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT I I I I I I i I 1 I I i I i i i .l qri chandramouli kalyan Chakravafthy' S/o' Krishna Mohan' '' io", qs y"urs; occ: Private Employe€' - - ' - .,^ j-54l3ot' Friends Colony' t o7., Flat No. 301, vut'"nipL)5' Hvo.ruoad, T'G'; 'r.iifui, ...... RES'.NDENT /DEFACI.-..MPLAINANT JOINT M EMO

1. The Petitioner heiein filed quash petition to Quash the proceedings in C'C'No' lL6ZU2O24on the file of the court of the XIV Addl' Chief Judicial Magistrate' Nampally, Hyderabad Telangana state which arose out of Crime No78412024 of Panjagutta Police station' Hyderabad Police Commissionerate' The Petitioners and the 2nd respondent have compromise out of court and the defacto complainant who is the 2nd respondent in the petition also filed affidavit and petition to compound the offences' hence this memo' \ ,_\i, ,Pt 23 2' It is therefore prayed that this Hon'bre court may be pleased to receive this joint memo and compound the offence and pass such other order or orders in the circumstances of the case. L.sa^.tL 1s Petitioner /Accused- .s*$^l^\*oU Petitione-r/ Accused K 2nd 2 responden efacto-compla inant HYDERABAD DATE: 04-02-2025 COUNSEL FOR THE P ONER t^O.-L,-lcrg COUNSEL FOR THE RES PONDENT