Writ Petition No. 13695 of 2023 · The High Court · 2025

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to delete the wrong entries made in pahanies and cancel the pattadar pass book issued the Sth respondent in respect of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.6.13 gts in Sy.No. 696111 eg situated at Damarakunta village of lVarkuk fvlandal of Siddipet district duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 16-05-2023 and issue pattadar pass book to the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac. 3.6 112 gts in Sy.No. 696/ 6 11 o after mutation in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. RAMAKRISHNA Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI CH. CHAITANYA MITHRA, REPRESENTING SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU WRIT PETITION NO: 3390 OF 2025 Between: Pathi Venkatesh Yadqy, S/o: Pathi Chinna Mallaiah, aged 45 years Occ.Agriculture R/o H.No. 2-3-118, DamarOwnta village M-arkuk Mandal, Siddipet District. AND

1. The State of.Telang.ana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Siddipet District. ..PETITIONER

3. The Tahsildar, Markuk Mandal, Siddipet District 4. Sri Pathi Babuyadav, S/o: Mallaiah, FUo Damerakunta village, Marqook Mandal Siddipet district. l.T{T{-I\rtt]Ii[\rf{i Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more parlicularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not considering the online application No. 2500006093 dated 01-O2-2O25 of the petitioner for patta pass book data correction as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable and against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the online application No. 2500006093 dated o1-o2-2o25 ot the petitioner and issue patta pass book duly making correction immediately in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the online application No. 2500006093 dated 01-02-2025 of the petitioner for issuance of patta pass book duly making correction immediately in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D RAMAKRISHNA Gounsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4:-- The Court made the followi THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL W.P.Nos- 1 of 2or23 and of 2or25 COMMON ORDER: Since the issue involved in both the writ petition is similar, the same are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that w.P.No.13695 of 2023 is liled praying this court to declare the action of the respondents in not deleting the wrong entries made in the pahanies and issuing pattadar passbook to respondent No.S in respect of land admeasuring Acs.6.13 guntas instead of Ac.1.13 guntas in Sy.No.696 l6/l@ as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently, prayed to direct the respondents to delete the above wrong entries duly considering the petitioner's representation, dated L6.os.2o23 seeking for issuance of pattadar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.3.06 7z guntas in Sy.No. Sy.No.696 /d/Ie . on o6.06.2023, this court issued notice before admission to respondent No.6.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that during pendency of the w.p.No.13695 of 2023 respondent No.6 therein again came to the subject propert5r on 25.0 l.2o2s g1dr. t.i.a to interfere with the peaceful possession and \ 2 EVV, -" Wp_I3695 2023 and 3390 202i enjoyment of the petitioner, he made online application I No.250o006093, dated oL.o2.2o25 seeking for passbook data correction. Inspite of receiving the said application, the respondent authorities did not consider the said application, the petitioner was constrained to file w.P.No.3390 of 2o2s praying this court to declare the action of the District collector, siddipet District and the Tahsildar, Markuk Mandal, siddipet District, in not considering the online application No.25OO0O6O93, dated OI.O2.2O25 made by the petitioner for passbook data correction as illegal and arbitrary.

4. Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, has produced written instructions, dated 29-lO.2O2S, issued by the Tahsildar, Markuk Mandal, Siddipet District. Relying on the contents of the said written instructions, he would submit that online application No.25OOOO6093 made by the petitioner'for passbook data correction was rejected in File No.B/ Llg /2025, dated 11.02.2025.

5. Sri Ch.Chaitanya Mithra, learned counsel representing Sri Prabhakar Chikkudu, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.6 is present. 3 EVV, J Wp_I3695_2023 and 3390 2025

6. Having perused the material on record and the written instructions placed by the learned Assistant Government I Pleader for Revenue, this Court does not see any reasonable ground to keep the writ petitions pending as the grievance of the petitioner has already been addressed by the respondent authorities uide File No.B/ ll9 /2025, dated LL.O2.2025. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed. However, it is needless to mention that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said rejection order, he is at libert5r to work out his remedies as available under law.

7. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in both the Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. . JAWAHAR REDDY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, TJ LS

1. One CC to Sri D. Ramakrishna, Advocate [OPU 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State-of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUTI

3. One CC to Sri Prabhakar Chikkudu, Advocate[OPUC] 4. Two CD Cooies \w HIGH COURT DATED:29110t2 25 1 COMMON ORDER o o a t WP.Nos.1369S of 2023 and 3390 of 2 025 rHE Sr4 14: I DEc &[ 2 C) -a ref.-n sPATC DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTIONS HOUT COSTS \buc