Dara Baby Rani v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 226
- A.P. Municipalities Act
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Re<:ording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to SD/. M. OS MAN ALI AS SISTANT REG //TRUE COPYII Advocate M DEV, SECTION OFFICER the State of To 1 2 3
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LA(MI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO: 31416 OF 2015 Between: Dara Baby Rani, D/o late John Ratnam, aged about 49 years, Occ Teacher R/o H.No.14-12013, Srinagar Colony, Opp. Sujatha Nursing Home, Huzurnagar' Nalgonda District' ...pETrroNER AND
The State of Telangana rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Dept., Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner & Director of MunicipalAdministration, Department 640, AC Guards, MasabTank. Opp PTI Building, Masab Tank, Hyderabad-500061.
The Commissioner Kodad Municipality, Kodad, Nalgonda District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not granting Building permission to the petitioner in respect of plot No.260 admeasuring 200 Sq.yards, situated at Sy.No.939, Addankivari Plots, in Gram Panchayat layout No.340/87 in Kodad village and Mandal, though more than 5 months have gone by since the date of seeking building permission from the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, malafide and contrary to article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to grant builfling permission to the petitioner in respect of plot No.260 admeasuring 200 Sq.yards, situated at Sy.No.939, Addankivari Plots, in Gram Panchayat layout No.340/87 in Kodad village and Mandal immediately in the interest of Justice and fair play and as per the time frame fixed by the A.P. Municipalities Act and Rules or in the alternative declare that the petitioner house building permission is deemed to have been granted tty the 3rd respondent and direct the responJents to permit the petitioner to go aherad with the construction of the house as per the Building permission plan submittecl by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent. !.$. NO: '!
OF 201S(WPMP. NO:40618 OF 201s) Pelition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affida'rit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent to consider for grant of building permission to the petitioner in respect of plot No.260 admeasuring 2oo sq.yards, situated at sy. No.939, Addankivari Plots, in Gram Panchayat layout No.340/87 in Kodad village and Mandal irrmediately in the interest of Justice and fair play and as per the time frame fixetl by the A.P. Municipalities Act and Rules pending disposal of the above writ petitiorr. Counsel fc,r the Petitioner: SRI D.RAMAKRISHNA counsel fc,r the Respondent Nos.i & 2: Gp FoR McpL ADMN-URBAN DEV counsel for the Respondent No.3: sRl N.PRAVEEN KUMAR, sc FoR MpcL The Court rnade the following: ORDER .\ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY o.31416 of ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following relief: \ \ "....to issue u,rit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not granting Building permission to the petitioner in respect of plot No 260 admeasuring 200 Sq yards situated at Sy.
No.939 Addankivari Plots in Gram Panchayat layout No 34O /87 in ' Kodad village and Mandal though more than 5 months have gone by since the date of seeking building permission from the 3rd Respondent as illegal arbitrary unjust unreasonable malafide and contrary to article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to grant building permission to the petitioner in respect of plot No 260 ac{.measuring 200 Sq yards situated at Sy.No.939 Addankivari Plots in Gram Panchayat Iayout No 340/87 in Kodad village and Mandal immediately in the interest of Justice and fair play and as per the time frame fixed by the A.P.Muncipalities Act and Rules or in the alternative declare that the petitioner house building permission is deemed to have been granted by the 3rd respondent and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to go ahead with the construction of the house as per the Building permission plan submitted by the petitioner to the 3.d respondent and to pass. "
2. Sri D.Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 3/Municipalities are present. 2
3. Letrrned counsel for the petitioner submits that cause in the present 'writ petition does not survive and the same has become infructuous.
Operative part
Re<:ording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to SD/. M. OS MAN ALI AS SISTANT REG //TRUE COPYII Advocate M DEV, SECTION OFFICER the State of To 1 2 3
4. PSK. BM {'i' I I I I l I t I I t i I I I I I t ! i 1 I f f HIGH COURT DATED:1 8/09/2025 ORDEI? WP.No .31416 of 2015 I I () (J ( * 11f[8 m * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFIRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS YsQtel lh) 4\r 0,,10 \ ?
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 226; A.P. Municipalities Act; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.