High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Nlicle 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondents more particurarry the Respondent No.5 in interfering with the petitioner's House construction on plot No' 422 South part admeasuring 100 Sq yards in Sy No. 5/er situated at lnamguda village, Abduilapurmet Mandar, Rangareddy District in spite of obtaining DEEr\4ED PERMISSION Vide Apptication No 1j1 is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonabre and contrary to the raw and vioration of Articre 14, 19,21 g6 300-4 of constitution of rndia apart from vioration of principres of naturar justice and consequently direci the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner,s House construction on Prot No. 422 sourh part admeasuring 100 Sq. yards in Sy No. 5/e9 situated at rnamguda vilage, Abduflapurmet Mandar, Rangareddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents'not to interfere with the Petitloner's House Construction on Plot No. 422 South Part admeasurrng lOO Sq Yards in Sy No. 5.eJ s;tuated at lnamguda village, Abdullapurrnet [\,4andal, Rangareddy Distrct pending d]sposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s JALAPALLI MADHAVI REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.l TO 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI P.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM DEV PANCHAYAT W.P.NO: 3306 OF 2025 Between: S.Sai Kumar, S/o Anjaiah, Age. 38 years Occ. Business F/o. H.No.1-20, Laskerg_uda village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy Distict, Telangana State - 501512. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Ihe Slrte of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary panchayat Raj and - Rural Development Dept Secretariat Hyderabad 2. The Collector - Rangareddy(P-Wing), Rangareddy District. 3. The P_istrict P-anchayat Officer - Rahgareddy, Rarigareddy District. 4. The Mandal Panchayat Officer - Abdullapurinet, A6dullapurmet l\landal, 5. The Gram Panchayat- Laskerguda, Rep by its Panchayat Secretary lnamguda village, Abdullapurmet l\,4andal, Rangareddy bistrict Rangareddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Adricle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAIMUS declaring the action of the Respondents nrore particulars the Respondent No. 5 in interfering with the Petitioner's House construction on Plot No.462 admebsuring 200 Sq Yards in Sy No. S/es situated at lnamguda village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District in spite of obtaining DEEMED PERMlssloN Vide Application No. 110 is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the raw and vioration of Articre 14, 19, 21 s6 300-4 of constitution of tndia apart from vioration of principres of naturar justice and *nruor"niirto,r.., the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner,s House construction on prot No.462 admeasuring 200 Sq yards in Sy No. S/eg situated at lnamguda village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner,s House construction on prot No: 462 admeasurrng 200 sq Yards in sy No: 5/e9 situated at rnamguda viflage, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counset for the petitioner: M/s. JALAPALLI MADHAVI REDOy counser for the Respondent Nos.1 ro a, cp idE in-*aHava, RAJ & RURAL Counset for the Respondent No.s: SRt p.KISBEXE RAo, sc FoR GRAM PANCHAYAT W,P.NO 3321 0F 2 025 Between: S. Sai Kumar, S/o Aniaiah 5?r.,:"jrrt1i #,a _ASe gq .years Occ. Business Rl/o. H.No. 1-20. o y Distict, re ra n ga nd "#;;;l se, R 6a u li pui."i r,r', "i,'i AND ...PETIT|ONER ;ffi gffili",,5;1ftiritrf,ii#ffi ffi ffi ";"
5. The Gram pahchavat - Laskerguda, Rep by its panchayat Secretarv rnamsuda vilase, AbdulaprirA M;;;I,"Aantiloiv oistricr l l Petition under. Articte 226of the Consritution of lndia crrcumstances stated rn the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularry one in the nature of WRIT OF A,4ANDAIMUS declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly ":"T::j:]::T: the Respondent No.5 in interfering with the Petitioner's House Construction on Plot No. 466 admeasuring 200 Sq Yards in Sy No. 5/e9 situated at Inamguda village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District in spite of obtainlng DEEIMED PERMISSION Vide Application No. 1 12 is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the law and violation of Article 14, 19,21 Bs 300-A of Constitution of India apart from violation of principles of natural juslice and consequenfly direct the respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner's House construction on plot No. 466 admeasuring 200 Sq Yards in Sy No. S/eg situated at lnamguda village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District. lA NO: I OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct the respondents not to intedere with the pelitioner's House construction on ptot No: 466 admeasuring 200 sq Yards in Sy No: 5/ca situated at lnamguda vrllage. Abdullapurmet [,4andal, Rangareddy District, pending disposal of the !vrit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s JALApALL| MADHAVI REDDy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI p.KISHORE RAO, SC FOR GRAM DEV PANCHAYAT W.P.NO: 3489 OF 2025 Between: S Sai Kumar,..S/o Anjaiah., Age. 38- years Occ. Business R/o. H.No. 1_20, Lasterg_uda_ v_itlage, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy Distict, Telangari State - 501 512. AND ...PET|T|ONER '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its principal Secretary panchayat Raj and Rural Development Dept Secretariat HvdilrabAd 2. The Collector, Rangareddy RanqareddV District. 3. The D.istrict P_anchayat Officer, Rangar6ddy Rangareddy District. 4. The Mandal .flglc.hgVat Officer, Abd-ullapurinet A6dultapurmet Mandat, 5. The Gram Panchayat, Laskerguda Rep by its panchayat Secretary lnamguda Ka ng a reo d y ru rstnct. village, Abdullapurmet Mandai, Rangaied-dy District. ,..RESPONDENTS Petrtion under Nlicre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarty one in the nature of wRlr oF MANDAN/us decraring the action of the Respondents more particurars the Rc'spondent No. 5 in interfering with the petirioner's House construclion on Plot No. 422 admeasuting .l0O Sq yards in Sy No: 5/e9 situated at lnamguda virrage, Abdu,apurmet r\,4andar, Rangareddy District in spite of obtaining DEEMED PER^/lSSlON Vide Application No. 1 1O is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the law and vioration of Articre 14, 1g, 21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia apart from vioration of principres of naturar justice and consequenfly direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner,s House construction on prot No 422 admeasuring 100 Sq yards in sy No. 5/e, situated at rnamguda vilage, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased lo direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners House construction on prot No' 422 admeasuring 100 sy yards in Sy No. 5/e9 situated at rnamguda virage, Abdullapurmet Mandar, Rangareddy District, pending disposar of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: M/s JALApALLI MADHAVI REDDy counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 To 4: Gp FoR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL Counset for the Respondent No.5: ,*, ,.^,r35XE RAo, sc FoR GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the foltowing: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI w.P.NOS. 3280 3306 3321 & 34a9 0F 2025 COMMON ORDER: In all thcsc r,i rit peli[iorts, the ltcl.iliotltlr ls r:h:rllr i',riirl! lllt' action oI lhc rcsl'rotttittt.rts ltartictllarL]' thc rcsporldcrlt No..' lll interfcring ,'r'itlr lltc colrstrucLiolls bcing nl:rde ir\ thc l)cLltloll( l' after oblaininq dcc'mcd pernttssions lor r:onstrur::lion vtrlrl Application Nos.11 l, 110, L 12 & 110 in W.P Nos.3280, 3306, 332 1 & 3489 ol' 2025 re spcctiveiy, in rcspect oi Sun'c1 No.5/eJ, situated at Inamguda Vitlage, Abdullapurmet Manclal, Rarrga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary and to pass such other order or orders in the interest ofjustice.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the peti[ioner has made applications for building permission in the prescribed proforma along with all .the relevant documents and sincc tl-re applicarrons have not been reverled or rejectecl within tl'rc prescribed time, the petitioner has dccme-d lhaL thc permission lras bt'i:tt gri,rnLcd at'rcl has aiso colnrctlcctl lllr: constrlrctior.r rtnd in thc tncanlimc. [hc rcsPorldcnt No.5 rt rLs inter[ering ,',"i1h titt t otrstTL.tt'litllt and Lll.:rt'[orc, Lllc 1)r('s(]ll t \\ r'rl petr tion s havc becn lilctl. !- \ '* --"! .>
3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.S has hled a counter.afhdavit stating that the legal riotices dated 10.Og.2024 in respect of the subject properties have been received and therefore, the applications of the petitioner has becn reverted \\, tlh "reuefted due to lauyer notlce issued to Gram panchagat sltc,t tcrl ollic:er ()rr flrrs tt)c are eppt.o(tcl.LrrLg slanclincl counseI lbr ler1rtI o1t rttLott' .i iitL:, i\ AIrt,r' licar.ing l)otlt tlt(, lrrLr.tics, rlris Clourt llncls tlia,L ilo (.r)nlntcnl lr.r ti.te t.r.sportricnt No.5 tlrat thc llctiLiortcr"s applicaLions arc not accompanicd b1, ail the relevant clocLtnrcrrrs and tlrc onlv rcason for stopping thc constr.uction or interfering with the construction appears to be the Iegal notice issued by the counsel on behalf of some other parties. This Court finds that on the basis of such legal notice, the respondents could not have reverted the applications but ought to have issue-d a notice/notices to the petitioner herein, called for his cxplanation and thereafter [aken a decision thereon. Thcrcfort:, rhe rcvcrted orders datcd 14.Og.2O24 are set aside ..cl ritr. r.r'sp.r.rdr:rrt No.5 is directccl to issr.lc proper .otices to tlrc rr.tilirrrr.r-. crrll lor tI.rc expr.ratio, .,cr co.srrrer his c.rpltrnirlLor.r. il. artr,, and therealtcr, takc a decrsion in lrccor'(IIrrIi c r.r itlt lttrr. Il is alsct nrLrlc c:lr:lrr. LIilrt as lctrrg ars J deemed irurldinq 1>r::'rr-rrssiorr Ir:ls r.rol ltcert rt 1r:cri'cl ix lht. respondenl. autl-roritics, thcv shall not intcrir:rc u,ith thc construction of the pcritioncr's properties
5. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of There shall be no ordcr as [o costs.
6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- T. TIRUMALA DEVI GISTRAR Dui-: rlseclolr OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural D lopment Dept Secretanat Hyderabad, State of Telangana The Collector - Rangareddy, Rangareddy District. The District Panchayat Officer - Rangareddy, Rangareddy District. The Mandal Panchayat Officer - Abdullapurmet, Abdullapurn"et Mandal, Rangareddy District. The Panchayat Secretary, lnamguda village. Gram Panchayat - Laskerguda Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga reddy District. One CC to SRI JALAPALLI MADHAVI REDDY, Advocate tOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] ONE CC tO SRI P.KISHORE RAO. SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH [OPUC] Two CD Copies To 2 4 A 6 7 8 I PSK. GJP 6 HIGH COURT DATED:1610412025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.3280, 3306,3321 & 3489 of 2025 1t, E SIar( o o 2 I lpn zozl I lfsrr...',gC f ( 2 (' ,/ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTONS WITHOUT COSTS a e,q' W\"