'X,J3J":::h[1?.,:RtliStxt:,',13-1",?SL\u*'f v. HYderabad

1 . The State of Telangana' Rep by its Public Prosecutor' High Court'

2.Smt.VillaHarini,W/o.VillaVeeraNag^endraKumarAgedabout3T-years' occ. Housewit", nyl rii rtriizoa' ind floor' Block-B' Ramky lowers' OaLfrioowti, HYderabad- 500 032' ...RESPONDENTS PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofcriminalPetition;theHighcourtmay be pleased to call for the records in proceedings in C C'NO 947 of 2020' on the file of the X-Addl. Jildicial Magistrate of First Class' Ranga Reddy District At' Kukatpally for the offence Under Sec'498 (A) IPC Sec' 4 and 6 of D'P'Act and quash the same. t.A. NO: 20F 2025 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighcourtmay HIGH COURT JS, J DATED: OStOil2O2S ,) !, 5 -;>+ .s( .r& {\. '\$$ .:iil e \,..i, '-a.:rr"' :l (. c COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 3 AND 4 OF IN/AND CRLP.No.1581 of ZO2S l I I I l ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION o \I Nl Q.r'46 \ ZJ HIGHCOURTFoRTm STATE oF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD I. A. NO.. Behveen: .i CRL.P.NO , oF 202s IN 1581 0F 2o2s 1 2 ) Villa Veera Nagendra Kumar S/o. Reddy Naidu. .'*,"", 42 years. Occ: Br.ir...,---, 3p.g :9911 rVo. H.No.2-9_052, Thota St eet, Vanaq, puduchery State neaaV Naidu S/o. Venkat Rao |ilta, 79 years, Occ: Agricutture, fg.t _ug9rr tVo. H.No.2_9-052, Thora Srr?.i V-r.. puduchery Smt.,Vjlla Saryavarhi Wo. Reddy Naidu fg.1 .rp9r, 70 ycars, O.c: Housc,u;G, , hYo. H.No.2_9_052, Thora S,.".i, Vr'r-r_, puduchery Srate. Stare I 2 I AND . . .Petitioners The State of Telansana. Rep by irs public piosec utor, High Court, Hyderabad Smt.,Villa Harini Wo. Villa Veera Nagendra Kumar fp"r.?*.r,, 3] I.*r, occ: Housewirb, rv_o IJat No.20J.2nd lloor, Block_B, Kamky'l owers. Gachibowli. Hyderabad_ j00 0.32. ilMa^^f INTMEMO OFCOMPR JO OMISE . . .Respondt:nts May it please your honour: I submit that the 2nd respondent rodgeel a compiaint befbre the p.s.Madhapur crime No'67g of 2018 for rhe offence I-rlSec.498-A, 324, 506lpc and a""l,o ", D P'Act on 05'0g'20r g and rhereaftcr final reporr filed on 13.02.2020. The case is pending vide C.C.No. 947 of 2C20, on rhe file of the X_Addl. .ludicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District At: Kukatpally fb. ,h" Under Sec.498 (A) IpC Sec. 4 & 6 of D.p.Acr. ";;; .,) 2 That subsequent to the initiation of the above case there were negotiations among Petitioners hcrein and Respondent No. 2 herein and the matter is settled out ofthe coufi. 3 4 The Respondent No.2 hereby given her consent and no objection for quashing of C.C.No. 941 of 202(), or the file olthe X-Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Redd1, District At: Kukatpally for the offence Under Sec.498 (A) IPCSec.4&6ofD.P.Act. 'Ihat, the pctitioner No. 1 and Respondent No.2 herein agrccd and understood that to dissolvc thc marriagc by filing mutual divorce performed on 01't September,2007. 5 That the petitioner No.1 and Respondcnt No.2 herein underlake not to interfere with each other's peaceful life hercinafter. 6 That the petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 herein undertake to not to file any criminal or civil cases against the cther parry in future. 7 8 That the Respondent No.2 agreed to withdraw the Transfer Petition (Civil) No.1985/2024 which is pending betb; e the Hon'ble Supreme Courl of India That the Respondent No.2 agreed to withdraw the criminal case lodged in the police Station, Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District against the petitioners vide CC NO. g47 12020 pending before the Hon'ble X Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at: Kukatpally by filing compromise petition before the I{on'ble High Court ofTelangana, at : Hyderabad. \N 9

12. 13

14. -3-. 'That the Respondent No.2 agreed to withdraw the DVC No.r5/2019 on rhe fire of Hon'bte X Metropolitan Magistrate Cour1. Ranga Reddy Dishict at Kukatpally filed against petitioners herein. That the Respondent No.2 agreed to.withdraw all the cases Liled:against the petitioners in the High Court of ,Telangana, Hyderribad. that, the petitioner No l herein agreed to withdraw aH rhe cases, ir pending fired against the $.espondent No.2 in the Hon,ble High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad That both the petitioner No. r and Respondent No.2 herein agreed to abide to the ternis' and conditions containe.d in the Memorandum of Understandins dt' 23-01-2025 in case of breach/vio,ration o. *iir,,ya.iiu"rite disob"dience Jf either the settlement deals or its terms and conditions, ,r. ;; terms, shall be liable for contempt proceedings. ;;";;;;;,;; That both the petitioner No.r and Respondent No.z srrati not withdraw their consent for obtaining the divorce by mutual consent and both the parties itnendered their rights to withdraw their consent for obtaining,the divorcc by mufual consent That in view of the above amicable decision between the Respondent No. 2 and Petitioners/Accused intended to compromise the above case. ;. ti That the Respondent No. 2 /Complainant had no objection to compound in C.C.No. 947 of 2020, on the file of the X-Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District At: Kukatpally for the offence Under Sec.49g (A) IPCSec.4&6ofD.P.Act. \\ J 4- Hence, it is prayed that this l{on'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise in C.C.No. 947 of 2020, on thO file of the X-Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District At: Kukatpally for the offence Under Sec.498 (A) IPC Sec. 4 & 6 ol D.P.Act betri'een the petitioners/Accused and the Respondent No.2 ,/De-facto complainant in the above criminal Petition and'quash the same to pass necessary order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances oIthe casc. Petitioners/Accused v.yrwy_@ l. Villa Vccra Nagcndra Kumar ? JLf' t-''.!"'

2. Villa Reddy Naidu Respondent No.2 s\Fs Smt. Villa Harini

3. Smt. Villa Satyav Aq,'-,O Counsel for the Petitioners P.Ramesh Babu Advocate (L,s:\..qx--- Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 Ch. Sudha Rani Advocatc i I i I ; I I I I I i I i i I I :,