High Court · 2025

1- It/Iukku Kanaka Durga Prasad S/o, Late Rama Rao, Aged 45 years, Occ. ' i*.h"r, Rl/o. Pedana, Krishna District' 2. Mukku Laksmi Kantamma', W/o Rama Rao'. Aged about' 70 years' Occ' House hold, presentlv rJiiilrui'ii i'iii'l zZt^o' tt'tain Road' Matam Veedi' pedana, pedana Xrirnn"]'Xnir,l, piui"trtszre66, Rep. bv rr.er Qei n9t-o-9r namelv shii padamata sbiil"'jiiv"".r,-S/o. Venkateswarao. Aqed 35 years' occ. Teacher' nyo.e-rsri,-Xrini'nitii nttni*"'' Krishna Districf' AP-521369' 3. Mukku Vara Prasad S/o' tVlukku Rama Rao' Aged about 50 years' Occ' " 3ig';;T ol.igner' presentlv residing at Britian 4. Mukku Sunitha w/o. lVlukku vara Prasad, Aged about' 44 years' occ house ' *iie, pt"sently residing at Britian Petitioner No.3 and 4 herein Rep by their GP^A holrler namelv Shri Padamata Satvanaravana, slo' ven'#e1""[itit''' ng"d- ls Jears' Occ' teacher' R/o' 3- ;;0i A';h;';;;; nrt', *'iu, ?'iinna oistrict' AP-52 1 36e' I nd ia ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana,.R"P Py-il: P-Y9li" Prosecutor' High Court for the " Stite of Telangana at Hyderabad lelangana' ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

2. Smt. Mukku Tulasi Durga,' W/o Kan.akg Durga Prasad' occ Housewife Aged ' ;i H[:-H.r'io.i-s-zzoiz, ndikmet' Hvderabad' ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P'C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the tMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C'C No 386 of 2018 (old c.c.No.31i,1011 before the Xilr ACJIr/ court at Nampaily) on the fire of XV Addl chief Met'opoiitan Magistrate court at Nampary (in pursuant to FIR No. 401 of 2O1O da,ed ,3.07.2O1O in WpS, CCS, Hyderabad fited u/s 498_4, 406, 506 r/w 34 of tp()) (As per court order dt.27t2t2| in l.A.No. 4l2S main prayer is arnended) l.A. NO: 2 AN D 3 0F 2025 Between: Smt. Mukk r Trrtasi Duroa Wo Kanaka Durga prasad, Occ: Housewife, Aged 42 years. F .No,1_e_27072, AdikmA Hy;";tA. '""' AND ...pETtTtONER/RESpONDENT No. 2 1 2 J 4 '- ' 's'| I ru ' \uv l\/ukku Kar aka Duroa prasad S/o. Late Rama Rao, Aged .15 years, Occ. Teacher. R o. pr:dan"a, Krishna Disirict. Mukku Lak;mi Kantamma..Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about. 7.0 years, Occ. ::e1i{"i!'il?:il[ili:,lii1?il*i.,;alu;yfl :;r??.i#filxs,:,J namety Shr padamata Satyanariyani, S/;. v;;i;i.j"wa.ao z\ged 35 years. occ. Teach;r. R/o.3_150, nitamui. nrtirarn'rr;, i+i:;;, District, Ap Mukku Varir p.asad S/o Mukku Rama Rao, Aged about. F0 years, Occ. Signat Desir ner, presenfly resioing ,Itiiiiij"""' ^r"" Mukku Suni ha Wo. lVlukku Vara prasad, Aged about. 44 year.s, Occ. house wite, prescn:ly residing at Britian Rgljl,_"*'. N,.3 and 4 herein Rep. by their GpA hotder namety ljhri padamata #; J; til T i8.lYTfi3 f t : h ii"; #[i ffi :xfl B;,f y"l{B:,ri*u,,fu lt 5 The State o Telanoana R"p pV_ its public prosecutor, High Court for the state of Tetarsara it Hyderabrd i;i;.s;il: I rvosuu'[ ..,RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT I.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Petition under S ection 320 (6) br aNlSs praying that in the circumstances stated in the AfficJavit arong with permission, the High court may be preased to permit the parties tr compound the offences in C.C.No.31 of 2O11,rn the file of XlIl Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Nampally, (FlR No.401 of 2010 dated 13.07.2010 in WPS, CCS, Hyderabad)' and allow the Criminal petition' r.A.'No: 3 0F 2025 PetitionunderSection32o(2)ofBNSSprayingthatin.thecircumstances stated in the petition to compromise affidavit and along with Joint memo' the High Court may be pleased to record the terms of compromise between..the partieshereininC.C.No.3,lol20llonthefileofXlltAddl.ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad in FIR No'401 of 2010 dated 13'07'2010 WPS, CCS, Hyderabad and allow the Criminal Petition' ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheliilemorandumof GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriS.Lakshmi Kanth, Advocate for the Petitioner, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 1 and of Smt. R Madhavi Latha, Advocate for the Respondent Respondent No No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER -I HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINA L PETITION No.164 3 ot 2025 COMMO N ORDER: l-his Oriminal petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petit oners/accused Nos.1 to 4 to quash the proceedings against t,tent in C.C.No.31 of 2011 on the file of Xlll .,\dditional Chief Jurlicial lVlagistrate Court at Nampally, registered for the offences punrshable under Sections 4ggA, 406, 506 rlw 34 of IPC. 2 lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitionen as; well as the respondent No.2, that durrng pendency of the pre sen i Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter anri accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to rer;ord the compromise between them and to compound the offencr:s 3 Vrde order dated 0g.02.2025, this Court directed thr> parties along witl I their respective counsel to appear befr>re the Secretary,. High Court Legal Services Committee, High C:ourt for the state of -erangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a re :ort. \ t I ) 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court' the parties have appeared and the Secretary' High Court Legal ServicesCommittee,hasidentifiedthepartiesandsubmitteda report, dated 13.02.2025 and the same is placed on record' 5 ConsequentlY, this Criminal Petition ln view of the above, lA Nos'2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos"1 to 4 in C.C.No.31 ol 2011 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Judicial tt/lagistrate Court at Nampally' are hereby quashed' It/liscellaneousapplications'ifanypending'shallstand closed. sat- n. SREEN AS SIS NASA REDDY T REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally' Hyderabad 2. The Station House Officer' Women Police Station' CCS' Hyderabad City a 4. One CC to Sri S Lakshmi Kanth Advocate [OPUCI 5. One CC to Smt' R' Madhavi Latha' Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CD CoPies Prosecutor' Hish court for the State of Telangana at lY3*"r"r,t"ilfjlr"rf'0"" I l I l i i I I I : I To, (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) o \T{ HIGH COURT DATED: 03l0it2121 i lir. s,i o\i ) A U\ 291,,:,1 ru5 .t" * 6r t' COMMON C}RDER l.A. NO: 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/A,ND CRLP.No. ft)43 ot ZO2S ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION 91 1I; MEMORANDUMOf,' n MISC PE ' HIGH COURT FOR THE SfITS OF TE .lii ATnVOnnanan ,:': r'i_ I.A.No. of2025 Crl.P. No. of2025 Between: l1;cr--- $ura-ilg ' Smt. Mukku Tulasi Durga, W/o' Kanaka Durga Prasad, Aged 42 y ears,H'No' 1 -9-27012, Adikmet''rottuoul:.r"titioner/Respondent No.2 And 1 2 3 4 5 t4 i l I Mukku Kanaka Durga Prasad, S/o' Late Rama Rao, Aged 45 years' Occ: Teacher, R/o. Pedana, Krishna District' Mukkd Laksmi Kantamma, Wo. Rama Rao, Aged about: 70 years' O.., fl"*. fr"ld, presently resicling at H'No'1-2J2-10' Main Road' Matam Veedi, P.edana, Pedana Krlshna, Andhra Pradesh-521366' Rep by her GPA holder namely Slui Padamata Satyanarayana' i7ol. v.or.ut.trrarao, Aged 35 years, occ Teacher, R/o' #3-150' A-rthamur, Arthamuru, Krishna District, AP' MukkuVaraPrasad,S/o.MukkuRamaRao,Agedabout:50years' Occ: Signal Designer, presently residing at Britian Mukku Sunitha, Wo. Mukku Vara Prasad, Aged about: 44 years' Occ: house wife, presently reskling at Britian Petitioner No.3 & 4 herein Rep' by their GPA holder namely Shri Padamata Satyanarayana, S/o Venkateswarao, Aged 3 5 years' Oc", Tea"he., nlo. +:-fSO, Arthamur, Arthamuru' Ikishna District' AP' " 'Respondents/Petitioners The State of Telangana through Public Prosecutor, High-Court for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad. ...Respondent/ResPondent r,,, *194; %13* .i;3i i.& l i I 1 2 .JOINTMEMO It s srrbrnitted the petitioner herein is the Complainant in the Cll. l.Nc. of 2025, is the wife of Respondent No.1 / petitioner No.l her<in i.,:.. Mukku Kanaka Durga prasad (A-1 in C.C No.31 of 2011). Aggrier t:d by the above Criminal proceedings, the Respondent No.l to 4/ Accused No.1 to 4 therein had preferred the Crl.p No. of 2025 on tl re F [e of this Hon,ble Court, which is pending cons: deration. It is sr"rtr,ritted that the dispute between the partir;s r,vere settled amicabl.r out of Court at the intervention of thc elcl,:rs. as such an Agre emrlt of Memorandulr of Understanding u a s entered into betr,v:en lhc parlies on 62.02.2025. In terms of the said MOU the Resptndent No.1 herein and family members have settled and pay the perm rnent arimony to the petitioner herein. Since rhc disputes between the p rrtir::r are settled, the petitioner deposed aflrdavit er pressing her no objec,ior to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.3i t20j7 on the file of XIII \ddl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally. Hyderabad in pursumce to FII{ No.401 of 2010 dated l3.Oi.2)ll) \\?S, CCS, Hyde abzLd The petitioner,{Respondent No.2 ,hdiein ard Respondent No. t o 4 r petitioners have no claims against each other. t4,tr1'^;? n tulo-touw .r-;:':4.-ra.Y: j,'r!'1,:;*'ila- /. It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in C'C'No'2 l/2011 on the file ol xlII Addl. chief Metropotitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad in FIR No.401 of 2010 dated 13'07'2010 WPS, CCS' Hyderabad and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Respondents 1 (V. U^"t"O [Ll-(q. hrq- 2 ? 3 v ffr'Yl/a{r DLWa' PetitiSner / ResPondent No 2 Couniel for Petitioner / espondent No 2 4 P" S"l6"ua7"* Counsel : aal* "r-;-C"$&ti ''"'