High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3709 OF 202s Between: Pampana Satyanarayana, S/o. Late Pampana Appala Swamy Aged about 70 yeari, Occ. Retired Employee, Rl/o. H.No. 15/2111/lMlG-347, Balaji Nagar, A.P.H.B. Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad- 500072 ...pETtTlONER AND State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad The ir,4etropolitan Commissioner, Hyderabad lr,4etropolitan Development Authority (HIVDA) Swarna Jayanti Complex, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500038 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Office of Collector and District lvlagistrate, Ranga Reddy District Kongara Kalan village, lbrahimpatnam, Kongara Kalan, Telangana- 501 510 It4/s. Gateway Prime Spaces lndia Pvt. Ltd, Plot No. 9, First Floor, Sagar Society, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034 Represented by its Director lr,4r. Vijay Aditya Reddy Oggu, S/o. Sudha Prabhakar Reddy State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary lrrigation and Command Area Development Secretariat Building, rrd"tullflaTTONDENTS 2 3 4 5 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or an order or a direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus. a) Declaring the actions of the official Respondents in not issuing NOC and final layout permivapproval to the layout HPR GATEWAY developed by the Respondent No. 5 in land admeasuring Ac. 66-10.44 Gts situated in Survey Nos. 9/P, 19/P, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40,47,48,49, 50' 51 , 52' 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 75, 76, 77 tP, 78, 79, 81 lP, 821P, 83, 841P, 104, 105/P, 106, 1071P, 108, 1091P, 1101P, 111lP,112, 113, 114,115, '1 '16, 117|P,118/P and 121lP, situated at Sardarnagar village, under Tukkuguda Municipality, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as being wholly arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, and consequently, b) Direct the Respordent no.2 to issue final layout permiUapproval for the layout HPR GATEWAY rleveloped by the Respondent No. 4 in land admeasuring Ac. 66- 10.44 Gts situatecl in Survey Nos. 9/P, 19/P, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40, 47,48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53,54, 55 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 75, 76,771P,78,79,31lP.82/P,83, 841P,104,105/P, 106, 107/P, 108, 109/P, 110/P, 111tP,112, 113,'14, 115,116, 117lP,118/P and '121lP, situated at Sardarnagar village, under Tukkuguda Municipality, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, c) Direct the lrrigation department (Respondent No.5) to issue No Objection Certificate to the layout HPR GATEWAY developed by the Respondent No. 4 in land admt:asuring Ac.66-10.44 Gts situated in Survey Nos. 9/P, 19/P, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 17, 48, 49, 50, 51. 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 6s 70 71,72,75,76,77|P,78,79, 81lP,821P,83, B4lP, 104, 105/P, 106, 107tF 108, 109/P, ',1 101P, 111lP, 112, 113, 114. 115, 116, 117|P, 1 1BlP and 121lP. situated at Sardarnagar village, under Tukkuguda Municipality, Maheshwaram Mandal. Ranga Reddy District- lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition undt:r Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nc. 2 to take steps for issuance of final layout permit approval for the layout "HPR GATEWAY" developed by Respondent No. 5 in Iand admeasuring Ac. 66-10.44 Gts situated in Survey Nos. 9 P. 19/P, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39,40,47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, l;4, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72,75,76,77|P.7t..79,81lP,821P,83,841P,104,105/P, 106, 107/P, 108, 109/P, 11OlP, 111|P, 112 113, 114, 115, 116, 117lP, 118/P and 121lP, situated at Sardarnagar village, under Tukkuguda Municipality, Maheshwaram Mandal. Ranga Reddy Distri:t. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED OMER FAROOQ Counsel for the Re:;pondent No.'l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Rer;pondent No.2: M/s. D.MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR lRRl & CAD Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -- The Court made the following: ORDER I { I I l!{oN'BLE SRI JUSTTCE KIAr(SHN{AN lWrit Petition No.3709 of 2025 / Order: \,{1. \,[,rhammed Omer Farooq, learned counsei for the PeUtloner. Ms. D.r\{aclhavi, learncd Standing Counscl appears for respondent \1o.2. Learnc<l couflsel for thc Petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberry to file a fresh writ pe titt()11. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect on the lrtrndle. Grantir:s Liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. )io costs As a sc<1ucl, interlocutory applications, pending if any, stand closed. ,TRUE COPY' SD/. L LAKSHMI BABU I\NT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER nt Secretariat
1. The PrinciP al Secretary Municipal Administration D Buildings, H yderabad, State of Telangana 2. The MetroPo I tan Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan DeveloPment Authority (Hl/DA) Swarna JaYanti Complex , Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, erabad - 500038 Srinivasa Na-qar, A 3. The District Collect tKo Magistrate, Ranga Kongara Kala n, Te langana- 501 510 District Office of Collector and District ngara Kalan village, lbrahimpatnam, meerpet, HYd or, Ranga Re Reddy Distric Secretartat Building, HYd erabad, State of Telangana
4. The PrinciP al Secretary lrrigation and Command Area DeveloPment OPUC] 5. One CC to SItl NIOHAI/M ourt for the State O. lwo CCs to CIP FOR MCP ED OMER FAROOQ, Advocate L ADMN & URBAN DEV' High of Telang ana at Hyderaba d. tourl o tvlis D.MADHAV to C;P FOR REVENUE, High Court PUC] 7. One CC t the State of Telangana, at B. Two CCs s ift;"ce;t" t;ptoa lRRl & cAD' High court for: the State of Telangana' at 10.Two CD CoPies I, SC FO R HMDA Io Hyderabad. [OUT] Hvderabad. [OUT] t C PSK a In ?+ \ To HIGH COURT DATED:1010212025 ORDER WP.No.3709 of 2025 t r'1 { (,) 2 0 r,,, , SFAT,_:.' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS {) t,\r >) \ * I I t