✦ High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Feb 2025
Length
2,021 words

of B.N.S.S praying that in the circumstances stated in the rvremorandum of Grounds or cririirilr"putition, the High court may be pleased to stay ail furrher pro"""uing, in ite' 1sT ADDL .ruNroR crvrl JUDGE CUM IX ADDL METROPOLITAN TiNCiSiENTE, AT KUKATPALLY. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2 025 -S2g Petition undr:r Section 359 (6) of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the.Memoranir- "i er"r"os of crimina petition, the High court may be oreased to permit *r. p.iiii"r", to fire the compromise Petition in view of tlte compromise between tt,.-p".ti". in conne:;tion with the crime No 142 of 2024 aoainst ttre petironeis ; ;-Ti" A-4 pending on the fire ot Hon'bre 1'' ADDL J,Niof, crvrr rLiricE"iuit,',x ADDL. MElRopoLrrAN MAGISTRATE, AT ,(.UKAT'ALLy-, for it,.-.-tf"ri.. under Section 85, 352, R/w 3(5) of B.N S. 2023 end Sec 4 of D.p nct., in ih.lilr"rt of justice l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: PARAVADA KRtTt{tKA ra KRITHIK-A, D/o pARAVADA SATYANAFAYANA. Wo DANTULU R I siAt NIK-H tL, nse. 30' ieirs, b"il ?iirt" Emptoye,-., Rt o 1 _7 4 F-6, Katyani Residerncy. eehin-u 6inG;6;',i ffiil;,1r, Hyderabao. AND ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2 1 The State of Tet,anqana. Through W.p S_. IT_CORR|DOR, CYBER.ABAD Represented by its pubtic prosEcutoi, H-igh c";;,;i1;ierabad. 2 DANTULURI Sl\t NtKHtL^(A-.t), .s/o -DS.S.N Raju, Age 5ljlt?_,,fftjBr;ioi r*^ nro [j r.ro se_2 o_iii h,''XFse6 opalapatnam (Rural), visakhapatnam, .A t, 53oo2f 3'1 years, Occ. COL(]NY, NAD Prahladpuram, ...RespondenUComplainant

3. sMT DANTULURI RADHIKA (A-2), Wo D.S S.N. Raju, Agqd -abg.ut !p vears, Occ. Household, R/o H. No.58-20-33/2, APSEB COLONY; NAD burcntne.lupnleu, Gopalapatnam (Rural), Prahladpuram, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 530027. REP BY GPA HOLDER Mr. Sai Nikhil Dantuluri S/o. D.S.S.N Raju, age. 31 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No.58-20-33/2, APSEB C-OLONY, NAD [f UfCntRR.tUpALEM, Gopalapatnam (Rural), Prahladpuram, Visakhapatnama, A.P. 53OO27.

4. DANTULURI SHIVA SURYA NARAYANA RAJU, (A-3) S/o Dantuluri Appala Narshimha Raju, aged about. 60 years, Occ. Pvt empl-oyee, R/o H.No-58-20- 33/2, APSEB'COrbruy, NAD BUTCHIRAJUPALEM, Gopalapatnam (Rural), Prahladpuram, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 530027. REP BY GPA HOLDER Mr. Sai. Nikhil Dantuluri S/o- D.S.S.N Raju, age. 31 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No.58-20-33/2, APSEB COLONY NA6 dutcutRRLupALEM,- Gopalapatnam (Rural), Prahladpuram, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 530027. 5 DANTULURI SWETHA @ SWETHA SAGI (A-4)' Wo VENKATA RAMESH VARMA SAAGI @ Ramesh Varma, Aged about . 34 years, Occ . Household, R/o Flat No. 101:Olive Heights, Lawsdns Bay Colony, Visakhapatnam Urban, A P 530017. REP BY GPA HOLDER Mr. Sai Nikhil Dantuluri S/o. D.S.S.N Raju' age. 31 vears. Occ. Private Emptovee, R/o H.No.58-20-33/2, APSEB COLONY' NAD - Gopalapatnam (Rural), Prahladpuram, butcHtRRLupALEM, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 530027. . . . ResPondents/A-l to A4 Petition under Section 359(2) of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to record the petitioner to compromise for quashing thJ criminal case against Respondents/ A-1 to A-4 herein and quash the proceedings against the respondents / A-1 to A-4 in Crime No 142 ol 2024 against thl peiitioners / A-1 to A-4 pending on the file of Honble 1't ADDL' .tLruron crvtl JUDGE cuM IX ADDL. METRoPoLITAN MAGISTRATE, AT KUKATPALLY. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of crimina{ Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Khaja Arajuddin, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri Mohammed Ghouse Pasha, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER I , I i t , HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.No s.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION N o.1626 of 202s COMMO N OTIDER: This Criminal petition is filed under Section 52g of BNSS by the petitionerr;/accused Nos.1 to 4 to quash the proce,:dings against them ir- Crime No.142 of 2024 of WpS_lT C,trridor (Cyberabad) Oyberabad District 2. lt is subnritted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as rvell as the respondent No.2, that during peniiency of the present C.rminal petition, the parties have comprornised the matter and accordingry, r.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 06.02.2025, this Court directed the parties along with therir respective counsel to. appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Tr_.langana, Hyderabad, for identification anri to submit a report.

4. Pursuant t) the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committeer, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 17 02 ?.025 and the same is placed on record. 2 \ \l -F --.,'rE

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 areallowed. Consequenfly, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 in Crime No 142 of 2024 of WpS_tT Corridor (Cyberabad), Cyberabad District, are hereby quashed. - Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/- N. SRIHARI SSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The 1't Additional Junior Civil Judge cum lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, at KukatpallY.

2. The Station House Officer, WPS-IT, Corridor (Cyberabad) Police Station, Cyberabad District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Khaja Arajuddin, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Mohammed Ghouse Pasha, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) kam/gh ti, r il ; HIGH COUFIT DATED:24\O2\2O2S i i i l t:-- 's o. 21i,n 2s?s ,):' i:: .J tt,+ *-:, COMMON ORTDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 rn/and CRLP.No.1626 ot ZO2S F[,JT,I[=^'#,fLt'"cRrMrNAL e6L (l I I I I I I I i r I I l IN THE HIGH COURT OF JTTIII.ATI ttlE .+ ...-- _ FoR iffii;f.r3P+:flfliifil rYDERABAD . I.A NO: of 2025 In CRL,P.NO of 2025 Between:- I pAr["uLURr sAr NTKHTL S/o. D.S.S.N Raju, tA_u:,, yegrs,' oic: private Emproyee, 1*,.:, R/o. R7q H.No. sB-20 -33 / 2, ld,.:.*" Cglplliab'atriam (Rural), prahtadpuram, Visitirlrpatnam , A.,p. SSOOZI. NAD BurcHrRArupALEM, RA DHrKA (A-2) f;,['r'.f !.1,:LURr lfffrXfl!:;: Years' occ: Househord, ln5,?-cgloNyr rveo eLrrcHrRArupALEM. ;'33iiT,i,l?H, ji1: H;q,T:;;; ;;"'' - --" REP BY GPA HOTDER !t1. sai rgikhit oantului iiJi:rjrflf;12,"g., 3 1 vears, occ : private Em proyee, * fl ::,1 _cgl:oNyj_ rvi-d surcHrRAr upA LEM. " i,!5i,T,l'*fr 5ll?t3i?ililp *. ;; :?iliii,Yt-,^'#lrs,::[,H,]lffl^"^RAru(A-3) iiiqfH:.!01[1, rffs;m,:,film:, R/o H No 58.20.33/2, r,:!ilT;.ti,H, jiill'l:i'#.p,,u,, --' rep ev cpA ri6i;E;"""' tr. Sai Nikhil Dantuluri Contd,...pl2 I I il2u age: 31 years, Occ: private Employee, !/": .P:S.!_.{ -Raju, R/o H.No.58-20-33/2, APSEB COLONY, NAD BUTCHIRA]UPALEM, Gopalapatnam (tlural), prahladpuram, Visakhapatnam, A.p. 530027. DANTULURI SWETHA @ SWETHA SAGI (A.4) Wo VENKATA tu\MESH VARMA SAAGI @ Ramesh Varma, Aged about : 34'lears, Occ : Household, R/o Flat No. 101, Olive Heights, Lawsons Bay Colony, Visakhapatnam Urban, A.p. 530017. REP BY GPA HOLDER Mr. Sai Nikhil .Dantuluri P/":.?:S.!-.{neg'u, age: 31 years, Occ: private Emptoyee, R/o H.No.58-20-33/2, APSEB COLONY, I\,IAD BUTCHIRA]UPALEM, Gopalapatnam (Rural), prahladpuram, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 530027. .....Petitioners/AccuseC No. 1 to 4. AND

1. The State of Telargana, Through W. P.S. n'-CORRIDO& CYBERABAD. Represented by iB; Public prosecutor, High Court at Hydr-,rabad

2.PARAVADA KRII'HIKA @ KRITHIKA D/o PARAVADA SA:TYANARAYANA, W/o DANTULURI SI\I NIKHIL, Age: 30 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o 7-74, F-6, Kalyani Residency, Behind Ginger Court, I\{adhapur, Hyderabad. .....Respondent / Complainant ... RespondenflDefacto-Complainant C.ontd...P/3 ,/' a ll3 I F T P M t. It is submitted that' this quash uash the Crime No' t42of 2024 ag he file of Hontle 1$ ADDL' luNIoR VIAGISTRATE' AT KUKATPALLY iN Wh No.1 to 4, First Petitioner Swamy Sri Venkateshwara and respon KalYana Ma father spent more than 30 Lakhs' in acco marriage was an arranged marriage and fami$ members of both the Parties' BY T P Honble couft to 'o'A-4 Pending on petiuon is filed PraYing ainst the Petitioners / A-1 t CNIL ]UDGE CUM IX ADDL' METROPOLTIAN ich Petitioners names are shown as accused dent No.2 were married on 04/05-07-2018 athering and her ndapam with 1000 PeoPle rdance with Hindu Rights and Customs' The pertormed in the presence of elders and g '

2. Whereas the marriage' disputes arose bet\^'Jeen the petitioner No'1 / A-1 and No' 2 herein und no* both of them decided to take mutual divorce and Respondent entered into a MOU' 2243 dated: ZO-Og'?.O44jhe ''t bearing F'I'R' No' 142 of ' 3.) The respondent No'2 has'filed a criminal --1'']"'*""]"r'Or^rn,O'e said FIR is registered for the offences punishable und section' 85' 352' ruw 3(5) of BNS-2023 & Sec 4 of DP Act'' and during the pending ihe parties decided to take mutual divorce netoib ttre as the disputes that arose between the :"-t"T:[ffiJ":'":,;#'that petitioners and the respondent No' 2 is resolved' respondent *o'' oo"tnt*totooTo of the above case both . 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I L I I l i I I I I I L I I i I I I I I I I I I I t // + 11 ottuuoings as such the present quash petition is fik continue the crimina, parfies praying *o ,l pe'fu'ners, A.1'o;HilH:,:,:,:ili;:'';"fl;":i:1,[ Hon'ble In ADDL. JUNTOR Cryrr JUDGE cuM rxADD[. METROPoL It is subrnifted ,,'**ooo*oN ATK,I(ATPALL\'' ^,;^^:,:* MAGI'TRA view ofthe ro"* rr* 'n be pbaged to quash ,nulu' pendins on the ftle .r'.:"" ,onr,rrnonu'" MFTR,,.LITAN orders as this Hon,bre ,ro*" which the respondent ro.r'n Date;3-02-2025. No' 742 or zozc;:bmissions ts ADDL ""''t'"t Ar KuKATpAtL;.': this Hon'ble court mav the petitionerr; / A-1 to A-4 t"" JUDGE ctr'M rx ADDL' to pass such other order or '-ar in the intere$ of iustice' for 'u'deern ft t'o o*,0 I has no objection' Place; Hyderabad. D'g^' rttchl L- Petitioner No.t/A-l D 3a, Piuh.'L- D 6a-;,..,rich,.'L Petitioner No.3 /A_3 (Rep. oy c.p.a.) i^.jllT,:t[lii^" D S"-, vitch.'(---- Petitioner Ntt.4 /A_4 (Rep. by G p.A.). ndent No.2/ Defacto cornplainant Counsel petitioners. Coun r Respondent No.2 !i I I l I i .i I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments