Sri v. The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or a direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents herein, more particularly Respondent No. 2 herein, in not disposing of the Petitibners representations dated 02.01 .2025 and 28.03.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and un just and consequently direct the said Respondents to dispose of the said application in accordance with I law in the interest of jlstice as otherwise the petitioners will suffer itreparable loss and injury. lA NO: 'f OF 2025 Petition under liection 151 cPC praying that in the circumstz nces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be plr:ased to direct the 5th Respondent h -.iein to receive any transactions over the said Layout LP No. ooOlT2lLOiPlglHMD,\12022, dated 05.09.2022 and in accordance vrith law lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstt'nces stated in the affidavit filed in suprport of the petition, the High court may be pl,-'ased to direct the 2nd Respondent irerein to consider the application of the Pelitioners herein dated 28.03.2 022 zrtd 02.01 .2025 by cancelling the said lz:yout LP No' }oolT2lLOlPlglHl.liDl,t2022, dated 05.09.2022 and in accordance w ith law Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED Counsel forthe Reslxrndent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent no.2&3: Smt. D.MADHAVI SC FOR l-iMDA Counsel for the Respondent No.4,5&8: Ms' T. SWETCHA AGP FOR REVENUE Cpunsel for the Respondent NO.6: SRI P. KISHAN RAO SC FOR I/lC Counsel for the Resltondent No.7: -- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.3131 OF 2o25 ORAL ORDER: Heard, Mr.Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No.1, Smt.D.Madhavi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Ms.T.Swetcha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.4, 5 and 8 and Mr.P.Kishan Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6.

2. The petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.0. 1 1 gts , in :, Sy.No.167143/1/1 and Ac. 1.18 gts., in Sy.No.167le;1, situated at Subhanpur Village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed copies of latest pattadar passbooks, 1-B Namuna (ROR), etc' Respondent No.7 submitted two applications dated O2.O7.2O21 and 27.L2.2O21 to respondent No.2 seeking approval for layout. Respondent No.2 has issued draft layout'--, 2 The afores aid property belongs to the petitioner, t -rereflore, he has subnritted representations dated 28.03 2022 and O2.Ol.2O2!; to respondent No.2 with a request to take action against respondent No.7. Despite receiving and acknowled;3ing the said representations, respondent No.2 did not act uJron the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondenl No.2, the petitioner fiied the present w it petition.

3. Smt.I).Madhavi, learned Standing Co unsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, on instructions, would I ubmit that respondent No.2 wiil consider the aforesaid repr,:sentations and take action against respondent No.7, strictly in accordance with the Hyderabad Metropolitan D :velopment Authority .A<:t, 2008 by putting the petitioner and respondent No.7 on nol ice and affording them an opportunitv c f hearing.

4. Irr the light of the said submission, notice to :espondent No.7 is dis;pensed with. This Writ Petition is c isposed of directing rorspondent No.2 to consider the reprr:sentations dated 28.0!,.2022 and 02.O7.2025 submitted by thr: petitioner and take action against respondent No.7, strictly in accordarce 'with the procedure laid down under the HMDA % Act, 2OO8 by putting the petitioner and respondent No'7 on notice and affording them al opportunity of hearing' Respondent No.2 shall complete the said exercise within eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order' In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions' if any' p I i ending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed' SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 The Secretary, tr,4unicipal Administration' Hyderabad ' TheCommissioner,HyderabadMetropolitanDevelopmentAuthority, Hyderabad. Reddy District

3.TheDistrictcollector,KongaraKalanVillage,lbrahimpatnamMandal'Ranga 4. The District Registrar, Sony Complex' Moosapet' Ranga Reddy District' 5. The Sub-Registrar, Maheshwaram SRO' Ranga Reddy District' 6. The Commissioner/Executive Authority' Subhanpur Villaqe' Gram Ranga Reddv District' Panchayath/Nagur.upun""h';,yZfiiii'tiiiip't'iv

7. The Tahsildar, Maheshwaram Mandal' Ranga Reddy District' 8.K.MaheshwaraReddy,S/o.K.RamaswamyReddyAoedabout45,occ. Reat Estate, ruo. prax"S"t-igiit. Briiii;s, da".ioo'*ti,"trvderabad' Telangana State

9. One CC to SRI MOHAMIMED ABDUL RASHEED Advocate IOPUCI 10.One CC to Smt. D MADHAVI SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] 11. One CC to SRI P. KISHAN RAO SC FOR MC [OPUC] 12. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV 'High 13.Two CCs to GP for Revenue' High Court for the State of Telangana at Telangana. [OUT] Court for the State of HYderabad. [OUT]

14.Two CD CoPies KKS GJP ,// t L*7* - - -3.1*-t HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 I ORDER WP.No.3131 of 2025 5 i4r€ 1 a-Jla iJ t'-' 22 i\Pn 26 ',3 '1, * \, DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,/g 1.2 /D,/+ /2.1