The High Court · 2025

2. Smt.Nitya Nunna, Wo Tejaswi Subhash Nunna aged about 36 years Occ.Hohe Maker R/o Plot No.72, Srinivasam, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ...Complainant Petition under Section 528 of stated in the Memorandum of Grounds pleased to quash the proceedings in accused No.2 and 3 in PRC No.559 Judicial Magishate at Hyderabad. 1 F ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant BNSS praying that in the circumstances of Criminal Petition, the High Gourt may be respect of petitioners herein who are the ot 2024 on the file of lll Additional Chief Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in PRC No.559 ot 2024 on the file of lll Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate at Hyderabad. N .2 an 3 o: oF2 5 BETWEEN: Smt. Nitva Maker (/o ilxl,rft ;Y1?Jfr li;yi*:B:',i"|",ffi e:ffi "*s::36vearsoccHome ...petitioner/Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

1. Nunna Veera Venkata l AND il#j#;t?:,i*","J|I#*?:*.,X,,Fi:1'.iffi ?i'gi^H|iUy,:y'SS"[?,:fi S:! 'H"'EiJ?|,,11I61ilfdi.'"?'Ilg3:iJililg:,-X:ryl3lil,"jii,fl,l.*[.Jffi:[: ...Respondents/petitioners in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ' fiil':,:ll3'fi{}fl'il;i,13'p?J,3:li}lfi,,iii"til,i?[?1["ts3,x,,1H:i;;"""'" ...RespondenURespondent in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 359(2) rtw 528 0f BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in tne. uemoiano* oi-c,"r"os of criminar petition, the High court mav be preased, t" p"r-ii-tl" iltnli".lJ to compound the offenses under Section 4Sr8 A tpc and 3, 4 "f Ci.p n.ii"riini on tne fite of ilt Addt. Chief Mekopotitan Mas,istrate at uyaeiaoao , p.n.blfiljidB ot 2025. Petition r'rnder section - A. 3 E Petition urrder Section 359(6) r/w 52g of BNSS praying that in the circumstances sterted in ttre Memorandrr-or 6-rl*io. of criminar petition,the High court may be pr'-'ased to record tne compromise-and consequentry quash the ffff:?,ii.*:,ilri;h?"tle or 202i o'i it''-tir" or ttt noit ciiil,ii.i,r This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of crimirar petition and upon trearing the arguments of Ms. Kanumuri Karyani, Advocate for the petitioners and sri Jitiender Rao veeramara, Additionar Public Prosecutor on beharf of Respondent ruo.r anl of sri Erichetty sai suman, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made ttre following: COMMON ORDER 1'\ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and .1631 COMMON ORDER: This criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 under Section 528 ort BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in P.R.c.No.559 of 2024 on the file of learned lll Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 4gB-A and 307 of the lndian Penal code, 1860 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingty, r.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been fited to record compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly -;r consented for compromise. That the allegation that her husband attempted to kill her, and the disputes between herself and Accused No. 1, arose out of their conjugal life, and hence the parties are willing t,) enter into a compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the Higtr Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 13.11.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secr,:tary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitterl a report dated 20.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into comprromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln 'riew of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequr:ntly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in P.R.c.lrlo.559 of 2024 on the file of learned lll Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioners;/accused Nos.2 and 3 are hereby quashed subject to the I petitioners/accused Nos.2 and 3 are paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the secretary, High court Legal services committee, High court for the state of relangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand ctosed ASSI Sd/. A. JAYASREE TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER I I To, Hyderabad (OUT) 1- The lll Additional chief Judicial Magistrate at Hyderabad 2. The station House officer, Banjara Hills police station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to [vls. Kanumuri Kalyani, Advocate tOpUC] 5. One CC to Sri Elichetty Sai suman, Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to Ms.Amera pasha, Advocate tOpuil 7. Two CD Copies ADK wAlong with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Ms. Kanumuri Kalyani, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed bV the ion,Ote Court vide order dated 28-11-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee", High court foi ine state of Telangana, and R.s 5,0.00./- ( Rupees Five thousand'only- ) to the "Tetangana High Court Advocates As^s^ociation, Hyderabad" and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 147186 of 2O2S dated 1Z-12-2025. : ':,'l' HIGH COUTTT DATED:281'|112025 COMMON OI1DER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.16:i1 ot 2025 THE SIA rg .\ (.) 2 4 JAt'l 2026 * ALLOWING TI.IE CRLP AND lA.NOs.2&3()F 2O2S IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , HYDERABAD CRL.P.No.L6Zl OF 2025 Between 1) Nunna Veera Venkata Naga Satyanarayana s/o Late NV Subba Rao, aged about 72 years occ:Retired R/o Plot No.72, St.No.6, Sagar Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 2) N. Leelavath Wo NWN Satyanai:ayana aged about 68 years occ: Housewife R/o Plot No.72, St.No.6, Sagar Society, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad AND 1) State of Telangana rep.by Sub.Inspector of Police, PS Banjara Hills, Hyderabad thru Public Prosecutor, High Court for The State of Telangana ... Petitioners 2) Smt.Nitya Nunna Wo Tejaswi Subhash Nunna aged about 36 years Occ:Home Maker R/o Plot No.72, Srinivasam, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad JOINT MEMO Respondents 1 It is submitted that Respondent No.2 herein has filed PRC No. 559 of 2024 on the file of the learrned III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners herein who are arrayed as Accused Nos.2 and 3 under the offences Sections 498 A IPC and Section 3 and 4 of DP Act. I' ' p..! N 2, Le&la.va1'L^'t-l B.C-lvrtrl/U. vlFT^ "l*, *n^rL 2 g ,, I r) 2 3 It is s;ubmitted that the matter is coming for trial and with the intervr:ntion of the elders and well-wishers, the matter was settled amicably as such the ResponrJent No.2 do not want to continue with the lis as the Respondent No.2 and her husband have decided to live tcgether. It is :;ubmitted that the rn;,:lter is settled outside the court, The Respondent No.Z/ Defacto Complainant is ready to withdraw the case against the petitioners l*erein.

4. It is l:herefore prayed that ttris Hon'ble court may be pleased to recorrJ the compromise stateinent and quash PRC No. 559 of 2024 on ttre file of the III Addil:ional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyde,-abad for the offences trnder Sections 49BA IPC and 3, 4 DP Act and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hence this Memo. Place: Hyderabad Date: 2q .40.20 / Nunna Veera Venkata Naga Satyanara'yana 'r'A'/ )rv N. Leelavath *,b c"^r&a Smt.Nitya Nftrfria lK'Vcr\;o^- COU NSELGOR PETITION ERS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2