The High Court · 2025

1. The Stale of relangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High court, Hyderabad, ...RespondenURespondent Telangarra State.

2. B. srinivas Raju, s/o Yadagiri Raju, aged 45 years, occ..Business R/o. H. No. 2-3-6471,\1188, New Prema Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. .RespondenUAccused No. 3 Petition under Section 359(6) RAff Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner for compromise in C.C. No. 36 of 2021, arisinr; from FIR No. 94 of 2017, on the file of XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad, in terms of the accompanied cr>mpromise memo and to pass such other order or orders as this Court may deenr fit and proper. I.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 - Petition under Section 359(2) RA/t/ Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Co.urt may be pleased to compound the offences for quashing the charge sheet in C.C. Nc,. 36 of 2021, arising from FIR No. 94 of 2017, on the file of XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad, in terms of the acoompanied compromise memo and to pass such other order or orders as this Ccurt may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A Anasuya, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made'the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA I.A.Nos.3&4of2025 inland CRIMINAL PETITION No.1488 of 2O25 DATE: ?.2.L2.2O25 Between: Kancharla Babu Rao AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court At Hyderabad. Petitioner/ Respondent No. 2.

2. B.Srinivas Raju Respondent/ Respondent. ' .... Respondent/Accused No.3. COMMON ORDER: lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent/Accused No.3, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

2. Vide order dated O4.L2.2O25, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court ) ) t { 2 Legal S:rvices Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

3. h;rsuant to the above said ciirection issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secreta4r, High Court Legal Services Committr:e, has identified the parties and submitted a rcport, dated

17.12.2025 and the same is placed on record

4. In view of the above, I.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 are allowed. Conseque ntly, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.3(i of 2O2L on the file of learned XIX Additional Chief Metropolir-an Magistrate, MSJ Court Complex, Secunderabad in connectio;r with Crime No.94 of 2OL7 of Chilkalguda Police Station, against the petitioner is hereby quashed subject to the petitioner paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2OO7O\, IFSC Code:SBINOO2OO7O, MICR No.5000O4O57) and Rs.S,OOO/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the s€une before the Registry. Misc ellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The XIX Additional chief Metropolitan magistrate MSJ Court Complex, Secunderatlad.

2. The Station House Officer j Chilkalguda Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, State of Telangana, High Court Buildings,

4. One CC to Sri' A Anasuya' Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to Sri.K'Venumadhav'Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies (Enclosed a coPY of Joint Memo) *', Dl/psl- . ' \&4' Note: rot-"t n*ount of Rs. 10,0001 (Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by ,noAnasuya,counselforthePetitionerasdirectedbytheHon'blecourtvide order dated 22.12.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Qainik welfare Hyderabad, and Rs' 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the tetangana' Hiuh court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed lvlemo as .proofofcomplianceUSRNo.4522of2o26dated1g.o1.2026.." ,,Director, I / I \ I i j ) \ i i I i t I i I I : : i l i i , T t t I $i AI t I T ! I t I I I t t l t I t !:i aI : : 'l i: :: I H I t t I HIGH COIJRT DATED :22,,t12t2025 THE S ( (J * 1 6 i: f:8 2026 * \ I COMMON ORDER lA. Nos. 3 6, 4 of 2O2S IN/AND CRLP.No.1ztg8 of 2O2S ALLOWING t.A. Nos. 3 & 4 of zozsand CRTMINAL PETITION ,j , i,, :,1 , ,, .. : :-l t rN rHEHrGH'co"X; IffiHffffi;t oF TELANGANA Crl.P. No. L488 of 2025 IN C.C" No. 36 of 202'l',arisiniJ from Ftlt No' 94 of 2OL7' on the file of Hon'ble xlx Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate MSI Court ComPlex, Secunderabad' Iletrareen:- i- Srir,irrus,Raju S / o.Yadagiri Raju' Age:45 Years, Occ: Business/ Rio. I{. No. 2-3-6 471 A/188, New I'rema Nagar' Amberpet, I-IYderabad' ,l- ...Petitioner/ ANi) : ",,.' 1). TIre State of Telangana, lepresented bY I')ublic Prosecutor' tsIiSh. Co-uit at I'{Yderabad' l*:r: 1 : ,}, lNo. 1, SRK Puram, . . Respo4dent/ Dg-facto ComPtuil.f# 0 e 2 .\ 1). It is submitted that, this quash petition is filed by the petitioner praying this Hon'ble Court to quash the charge sheet in C.C. No. 36 of 2021, arisiirg from FIR No. 94 of 2077, on the fiie of Hon'ble XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan lvlagish'ate MSj Court Complex, Secunderabad, in which his narne is shown as Accused No. 3 2). It is submitted that, basing on a complaint filecl by the respondent No. 2 herein the police Chilkalguda, registered a F.I.R. No. 94 of 2077, f or tl-re offences punisirablc under Sections 420, 467, 468, 4Tl, 474,701) r/w. 34 I.P.C., after cornpletion of the investigatiory the investigatiort officer tiled tire charge sheel in which the petitioner's narne is shown as r\ccused No. 3 3). tt is submitted t'hat, the allegations of the respondent No;,2 in his complaint are that, impersona-ting him with a fake identity card i. . . .. forging his signahrre a sale deecl docllment No1,2747 of 2076, datea Of- 06-20'1.6, in rr:garding with the plot of land of the respohdent No,'Z ' bearing Plot irlo. 67 in part of Sy. No.'15 (old No. 30/2), admeasuring -, i, ,

333.33 sq. Ycls or 278.69 sq. Mtrs "situated at Padmalao Nagar, Zamistanpur, :3ecur-rclerabad, adding the Municipal No. 6--1,-1g2 / 67, o o l' 3 is executed in favoul of the'petitioner' herein ancl'another named ]' Dhanalaxmi,who,SnameisshownasAccusedNo.2andothersnalnes areshownasAccusedNo's'1''4to6'assuchrequestecltotakeaction' mitted that, ther"ui'"t, the respond'ent No' 2 herein had executecl a registerecl cancellation cleed d'ocument No' 828 of 2017'dated 08-03-2017, cancelling the said legis tered sale deed' document No' 2247 j of 2076, dated 01'-06-2076' 5).Itissubmittedthat,thepetitionerl.rerlinhldfiled,awrit before this Hon'ble Court challenging petition in W.P. No' 18285 of 2A17 ' t{re said registered cancellation deecl document No.828 of 20\7, dated 08-032017- The said writ petition r'r'asi'dismissed intorrgn orders'dated "", 37-07-2025. 6). It is submitted that' the Petiti 'oner herein had filed this quaqh petition with aPrayetto quash the pt'oceedings against him, 7\.t-is submitted that' now'at'the intervention o f elders and well ' : wishers the Parties got resolved thE differences which arose between themintermsofthesaidsettlementttre.petitionel^.-=--. herein and the a 4 Acc*sed No. 2, 4 to 6 assured to the respondent No. 2 that, they sha-ll not -nterfere and shall not clairn any right over the said subject matter plc't of land and in regarding with the saicl canceliation deed document No. 828 of 2017, dateci 0g-03-2017, and also assured the respcrnclen - No. 2 that, tirey will not interfere in dnlr pur.,ner in peaceful possession ancl enjoyment of the said plot of land with the respondent No' 2 ancl irlso shown their readines;s to cooperate in all aspects before all authorihes, for getting permissioir or to deal with in any marlner by the responc ent No. 2 in regarding r^.,ith his plot of lancl, for which the r:esPondent No. 2 had accepted to coaperate for $etting the quash of the charge she.t/criminal proceedi,gs' against the petitioner and the Accused Nc's. 2, 4 to 6, accordingiy'this joint ,compromise 1S entered into. 8). That, the petitioner assures that, he shall not claim any right or interest and shall not interfere in any manner in regarding with the above stated Plot No. 6T in parr of sy. No: 15 (otd No. g0/2), aclmeasuring 333.33 sq. yds or 27g.69isq. Mtrs situated at paclmarao Nagar, Zamistanpur, secu.derabaci; while enjoyi'g the same by the respondent No. 2. 'ary P 5 9). That, the respondent No:r2_ can deal with, his above stated plot as Per his will and wish and the petitioner assures the respondent No. 2 that, he shall cooperate in all aspects with the respondent No. 2 in enjoying or dealing with in any mallner ir-r regarding with the said plot before all authorities or wherever respondent No. 2 requests. L0). That, the petitioner shall r,r,ithdraw the writ appeal filed by him i.e., in W.A. No. 1188 of 2025, if so advices by filing appropriate affidavit/petition. 11). That, the respondent,,No. 2. can get back / g"t returri , the registered sale deed docurnent No. 2?-47 of 20'1,6, dated 07-06,-2016, which is fil-ed along with charge sheet before the Hon'ble XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad, for which the petitioner and otlrer Accused No's. 2 and 4 to 6, have no objection and are ready to ::i ., cooperate for the same. 12). That, the petitioner herein along with the Accused No. 2had filed a suit in O.S. No. 679 of.2A1,6, pp the file of Hon'ble I Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabaci, against the son of the : c 6 \\-i respondent IVo. 2 ar-rd 2 others for perpetual injunction, the said suit was d,-'cr€ed in favour of the plaintiffs, through this settlement the petitioner irnd the Accused No. 2 n ho is the plainfi{t No. 1 in the said suit assurer; thc respondent No. 2 that, they do nqt claim any such right and they sl-rall not interfere irr any manner in regarding with peaceful possession ancl enjo1,11snt of the subject matter plot of land while enjoying by the respondent No. 2 as the respondent No. 2 is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the sauie. 13). l'hat, the respondent No. 2 has no objection for quashing of this criminal proceedings by allowir-rg this quash petition. 14). Tl at, the respondent No. 2 shall file an affidavit to the effect that, he has no objection for quashing of the cridnal proceedings by allowing this criminal petition. 15). Fo;: all the reasons stated above, this Hon ble Court may be pleased to qtrash the charge sheet in C.C. No. 36'o,f 202'1., arising from FIR No. 94of 2077, on the file of Flon'ble XIX Additional Chief t @*Y ? ( Metropolitan Magistrate, MSJ, Corrt Complex,, Secunderabad, and to pass such other order or orders hs this Hon'ble court may deern fit and proper in the interest of justice. Date: 29-70-2025. Place: Flyderabad. tioner. ctz ": Counsel for the Petitioner. Respondent No. 2. Counsel .1IOr t ,, ]i 4