✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 13 Mar 2006

Writ Appeal No. 206 of 2006 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

Writ Appeal No. 206 of 2006B PRAKASH RAO, D APPA RAO

Case at a glance

Decided
13 Mar 2006
Bench
B PRAKASH RAO, D APPA RAO

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. The A.P.State Cooperative Bank, rep.by its Managing Director, Hyderabad. And one other. ...RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.206 OF 2006 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At…

Judgment

(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 20.12.2005 in W.P.NO.24562 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: The Nalgonda District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Nalgonda District at Nalgonda rep.by its General Manager, Mr.K.Rama Krishna, S/o.K.V.N.Murthy, 46 years, R/o.Nalgonda. AND ...APPELLANT

Operative part

1.

The A.P.State Cooperative Bank, rep.by its Managing Director, Hyderabad. And one other. ...RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.APPA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO.206 OF 2006 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao) Heard both the sides. At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage. The appellant is the management against whom; the second respondent filed the Writ Petition being W.P.No.24562 of 2005 seeking a writ of mandamus assailing the action of the appellant in proceeding against the amount payable towards gratuity. The learned Single Judge, having taken into consideration the fact that the amount payable is towards gratuity and the same cannot be attached as it is exempted under Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) as well as the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (‘the Act’ for brevity), allowed the Writ Petition stating that the said amount is not liable to be attached or recovered. Hence, the appeal. Having heard the counsel on either side and on perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that there is absolutely no serious dispute in regard to the preposition of law that the said amount, which is only towards the payment of gratuity, is exempted under Section 60 CPC as well as the provisions of the Act. In view of the same, there are no merits in the appeal. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. _________________ (B.PRAKASH RAO, J) _____________ (D.APPA RAO, J) 13th March 2006 RRB

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 60; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 13 Mar 2006. The bench was B PRAKASH RAO, D APPA RAO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Appeal No. 206 of 2006). ← Search more judgments